Karl Marx Inequalities Under Capitalism

Superior Essays
Karl Marx is the founder of the Marxist movement, an ideology that is directly opposed to capitalism. Marx believed that capitalism is all about economics, people are only interested in maximising profits for their own personal gain and competing against similar businesses. Marx argues that in capitalism, the only goal is money. He states that capitalism is all about economics and that if a capitalist does not only focus on the potential amount of money that he could make, then it is likely that his business will fail. One of the ways capitalists maximise their profits is to keep the wages of their employees low and large outgoings to an absolute minimum. Marx states that due to this aspiration for higher profits, capitalism exploits the working …show more content…
Discussed in the communist manifesto Marx states that “The oppressed are allowed once every few years to decide which particular representatives of the oppressing class are to represent and repress them.” The Bourgeoisie are the dominant class in society both politically and economically. As they have ownership and control of the factories and other such mean of production they are the firm and politically dominant class. Most of the political leaders in a capitalist country are drawn from the Bourgeoisie this ensures that they laws are passed that would allow them to remain in power over the proletarians. Marx states that this is a flaw within the capitalist system itself as the bourgeoisie have been able to use their power to not only oppress the proletarians but have been able to spread their impact into areas of politics. This enables them to ensure that they remain firmly in charge and able to continue to oppress the working class for a potentially infinite amount of …show more content…
Capitalists do not need to do and work themselves they use their workers to earn them money by producing their products. As the capitalist owns the factories and other means of production, they know and control the finances of the business, additionally they own all the products that are made by their business even though the products are made by their proletarian workforce. The products that the workers make strengthen the capitalist’s business, the capitalist is further strengthened when the proletarians buy the products from the capitalist’s business. This starts a vicious cycle that always ends up in the capitalist favour as he is strengthened not only by the products that his workers make but also by the proletariats. Karl Marx comments on this alienation are displayed through his manuscripts, Marx states “In the sphere of the political economy the realisation of labour appears as a loss of reality for the worker, objectification as loss of and bondage to the object and appropriation as estrangement and alienation” (Marx, 1959).

In conclusion Marx argues that there are many inequalities within capitalism, which have been explored through the essay. In my opinion I agree with Marx his views on the use of religion as a tool to oppress the masses I have found that it is very much in line with my own personal views. I also find myself sympathising with Marx`s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Marx thought it only a matter of time before the working class as a whole rose up and over threw the rich. That the line would eventually be pushed too far, that the workers would reach the end of what they were willing to endure. Bourgeois and proletarians, or the rich and the poor were in a constant struggle for control and that the proletarians would eventually rise up and take control of what was rightfully theirs. That the workers could and would take being ground into the dirt for the gain of others for only so long. Once the proletarians had taken control, the means of production would be distributed among publically owned corporations.…

    • 2117 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Communist Manifesto states that she struggle between the working class and the bourgeoisie always results in a revolution and eventual “ruin of the contending classes” (1). Marx clearly states that the…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Like the classical economists, he focused on the dynamic evolution of capitalism as a system, and the turbulent relationships between different classes. ”(Stanford p.54) During the Mid-nineteenth century, Marx opposed capitalism, believing “payment of profit on private investments did not reflect any particular economic function” (Stanford p.54). Marx is saying that the workers aren’t getting paid for the amount of work they put in. Capitalists were exploiting these workers and rather than sharing the wealth/profits, they were paying the workers a diminished amount (Labor Theory of Value).…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The goal of the capitalist is to achieve the largest profit margin as possible. The workers can usually never own anything except their labor, which is their means of making money. Marx lived during the industrial revolution, which saw the advent of tremendous wealth due to the large number of factories being built during this time. Living and working conditions were sub par for the working class during these times. People worked really long and laborious hours for generally a small amount of money, which in turn made the factory owners abundantly wealthy.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx stated that proletariat was oppressed and under the exploitation of the bourgeoisie. The workers would create products that the capitalist would sell for more than it was actually worth. There was profit from this system, but the proletariat did not benefit from it. According to Marx, this system would lead the society to self destruct. He believed the the continuation of exploitation would cause the proletariat to hate the bourgeoisie.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marx Wage Labour Analysis

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The capitalist who goes on to buy labour power and pays for its value then go on to own that specific labour process. “Wages are the sum of money paid by the capitalist for a particular labour time or for a particular output of labour” (Marx, 1847). Marx portrays a labourer and a capitalist as two completely different people and rightfully so as a labourer is the person that puts in all the hard work and time to manufacture the specific products for the capitalist who is the one that sits back and receives all the money from the products that have been manufactured by his or hers labourers. The capitalist buys their own labour with their money. They then go on to sell their labour.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Today in our modern society you can see examples of this statement. The never-ending tables and graphs you see depicting the wealthy, ruling class’ grasp on society and the filling of their pockets. Marx saw this and identified that the ruling class was using its growing power to control elements of society. (Durkin & Carrothers,2015) Also, he saw the differences in the two classes of capitalism the “bourgeoisie” and the “proletariat”.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Although Marx’s critique was drafted in 1867, the values of his critique still has importance in this modern world and society and remains extremely relevant in the twenty-first century. Karl Marx’s in-depth discussion of commodities allows for great insight into the history of capitalism. Through Marx’s critique, the the truth what capitalism is discovered. Capitalism is not just an system revolving around money, it is an intricate system that essentially is a special form of manual labor and the exchange of personal goods. Marx’s critique of capitalism gives us the tools to intelligently apply the ins and outs of capitalism to everyday life.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx criticizes capitalism in a multitude of his essays, including the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. His critique of capitalism varies from the exploitation of workers to the instability of the capitalist system, but fundamentally his issue with capitalism is the dehumanization of laborers. Marx argues that under capitalism, laborers are dehumanized because they are alienated, or disconnected from fundamental human properties, in four aspects – products of labor, labor, species-being, and human-human relations. The basis of Marx’s theory of alienation is the laborer’s estrangement from his labor, which arises from alienation from the laborer’s object of production. According to Marx in the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, “the object which labour produces – labour’s product – confronts it as something alien, as a power independent of the producer” (71).…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Merriam-Webster defines capitalism as “an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market”. Karl Marx was a socialist, born in Prussia in 1818. He is considered by many to be the father of modern day communism. Marx and his followers were very critical of capitalism for three main reasons. This essay will distinguish and evaluate the three Marxist critiques of capitalism.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most fundamental and important of these conflicts is that between the Bourgeoisie (those who own and control the means of production in society) and the Proletariat (those who simply sell their labor power in the market place of Capitalism)”. (Theories, 2009) One of the reasons that the philosophy of Karl Marx and Marxism is so misunderstood is the connection that society makes to…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx evaluated the capitalistic system through economic and social discourse. He evaluated the effects of the transition from a socially stratified society in feudalism to the capitalistic result that was the current trend in society. I will discuss how the minimum wage debate is viewed through a Marxist perspective Although the means of production was undergoing enormous leaps forward through the industrial revolution, the movement out of feudalism ceased to improve for those who lacked capital or property ownership.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Their system of administration combined both their own as well as Roman elements. The new social order saw the dominance of the military commander, who became the monarch & a new nobility, drawn from warriors and an educated, Romanised elite. Peasants, who constituted their armies, became impoverished due to continual warfare. This led to their enserfment to feudal lords. There existed 2 kinds of groupings in feudal Europe- serfs and lords in villages and craftsmen & journeymen or apprenti who were part of the guild organization in towns.…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays