The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx And Friedrich Engels

Improved Essays
“WORKING MEN OF ALL COUNTRIES, UNITE.” This is a quote from the Communist Manifesto, written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. This quote embodies the very essence of what Marxism was intended to do; unite the proletarians against the bourgeoisie. Marx, and others like himself, championed for the rights of the proletariat, better known as the working class. The Communist Manifesto is the collection of ideas shared by Marx and Engels, detailing social and political life during the nineteenth century. Their book also alluded to how the dismemberment of capitalism would lead to the penultimate reign of a socialist society, which would then transform into communism. Communism would be the last leg of the journey, from which the life of …show more content…
It pits the wealthy against the lower class of society. This conflict is not the product of greed, or the lack of compassion for the poor, but it is the product of capitalism in Marx 's view. Marx contends that a capitalist society can only lead to social inequality by reason of, it is designed to promote individualism . The proletariat sells their labor to the bourgeoisie, or the capitalist, for money, but the capitalist owns the machines, the building, the product, and everything else associated with making the product. The goal of the capitalist is to achieve the largest profit margin as possible. The workers can usually never own anything except their labor, which is their means of making money. Marx lived during the industrial revolution, which saw the advent of tremendous wealth due to the large number of factories being built during this time. Living and working conditions were sub par for the working class during these times. People worked really long and laborious hours for generally a small amount of money, which in turn made the factory owners abundantly wealthy. This was unacceptable to Marx. He asserted that the capitalists were only concerned with their profits, therefore no form of social reformation would improve the social inequalities endured by the proletariat. With this being the case, Marx believed that eventually the workers in the factories would realize that they were being exploited, and they would come …show more content…
Capitalism would first give way to socialism. One of the main or central ideas of socialism is a public right of possession, of the businesses and industries within a country. This would allow the resources produced by the businesses or industries to be used with the interest of the public in mind. Under socialism, workers would receive wages that are satisfactory in accordance to the amount of work they did. Since the factories would no longer be owned by the capitalist, but instead owned by the state, this would rid profit-making as its number one priority. Industrial production would now be used to meet the needs of the people, instead of just being another means for a select few, to accumulate more wealth. The need for a ruling class would no longer exists. Socialism would then transition into communism. Under this new communal regime, all of the important needs of a society would be finally met. The idea of the state, as the majority of the people know it, would be an afterthought, being there would not be any conflicting issues between the classes now, since everyone would be

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Marx said that capitalism would make the rich richer and the poor poorer. Von Mises disagrees with almost everything Marx had to say and he would emerge as a defender of the capitalist system. Mises saw how capitalism affected society…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    More specifically, how much the government receives. In communism, their essentially no private ownership of any kind, as the people work for each other and the good if the community as a whole, rather then work to benefit themselves as individuals. It also wishes to throw away the class system as a whole and not define the poor from the rich, and just keep them at equal levels. Not quite as severe, socialism is less lenient on closing the gap between the rich and the poor, but rather keep the two on fair playing fields and sharing the wealth of the people with everyone. As opposed to taking away private ownership from individuals, socialism believes more in assisting the lower-classes to keep them equal to the higher-class (I.e.…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Globalization, a social transformation that provides cheapest labor and resources for capitalists in order to minimize their costs, seemed emerging as a good strategy for capitalists. However, it may cause "underconsumption" because low wages on labor undermine the desire of buying from people. Hence, the market will be destablized and the capitalists may not make enough profits. Eventually, this cycle will remain inefficient. Since the capitalism is the dominant idea in the world, Karl Marx remained his idea and argument on capitalism in his work, called…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism was known as a conflict theory because of the society struggles between the rich and the poor. He believed there to be a way to construct an equal society, and getting the best out of everyone. The opposite of of the system Marx was aiming for was capitalism. Capitalism is the society we live in today, where corporations are owned by the owners. Therefore, capitalism treats people unequally.…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Karl Marx Vs Adam Smith

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Adam Smith advocates that division of labour and specialisation is the finest way to produce goods as firms can become extremely efficient and produce numerous more goods in a day as the production is divided into various parts. Karl Marx disagrees with this method as he states this will cause a state of alienation. Due to the face workers are only working on a portion of the good rather than producing the whole good itself, they are alienated from the product and do not feel a sense of accomplishment or satisfaction when working. Which will cause a reduction in labour morale. Both of these two economist provide us with theories that are both extremely useful and important to modern day economics.…

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As such it is always better to have a socialist state than having a capitalist state. Considering all the facts written earlier I fully endorse a socialist way of life where so much of relief could be expected by the poor and middle class people. Even the price of goods in a socialist governed country is reasonable, but not so in a capitalist state where the sole aim is to make profit. One could easily judge the difference in the two economies. To avoid friction and unrest in the country let us all do our best to protect a socialist form of government.…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Luxemberg believes in the ability to make gradual social reforms is the way to work towards socialism is a viable and legitimate alternative to revolution if it is done correctly. “The trade union struggle for hours and wages and the political struggle for reforms will lead to a progressively more extensive control over the conditions of production,” and “as the rights of the capitalist proprietor will be diminished through legislation, he will be reduced in time to the role of a simple administrator.” “The capitalist will see his property lose more and more value to himself” till finally “the direction and administration of exploitation will be taken from him entirely” and “collective exploitation” instituted.” Those who control the labor should not be the only…

    • 1089 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This book outlined their ideas of the Communist revolution and planned out that the only way they could succeed is by a revolution. After reading this book, he analyzed it in his pamphlet “Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism”.2 Based on the writings of Marx and Engels, Lenin created the vanguard party as a means to bring upon the revolution talked about in the Communist Manifesto. According to Karl Marx, because the proletariats weren’t political people they needed a separate group to lead them through the changes needed to bring Communism. After creating the proletariats the vanguard party would usher in the revolution to take down capitalism. After the revolution succeeded they would give the ruling power to the proletariats who would rule over themselves.34 Following Karl Marx’s works, Lenin feared that the capitalists would take over the world and industry would exploit the working class to increase their profits and the wealthy countries would take advantage of the poorer countries.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Further, borrowing from the Master-Slave dialectic, Lukács argues that the proletariat has more power to end reification while the bourgeoise might even intensify it. This contradiction of the capitalist society is essential to its decline. This decline while not really a transformative revolution but over time will allow the proletariat to rise in power. Therefore, class consciousness is the essential characteristic of revolutionary politics. The transformation of society through the communist revolution will only arise…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The struggle is that factory owners doest want to pay a fair salary because if they do that they wouldn’t have gain as much profit as the actually do. The bourgeoisie are only willing to help themselves to acquire more profit and leaving the working class in the same struggle without any way to get out of struggling lifestyle. That’s one reason I agree with Marx and Engels statement about the bourgeoisie and the working…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays