The Pros And Cons Of The Federal Bureaucracy

The main con would be that most of these cabinet members have a specific area of interest that they deal with, unlike the President who wields a much larger area of job responsibilities. They also might not have any experience whatsoever to hold the title Commander in Chief. Since the Secretary of State is the first Bureaucratic position to assume Presidency within the succession line, his previous job deals with foreign policy so he should have a general understand on the importance of diplomatic relations with other countries. Next is the treasury, he would be able to steer us out of an economic crises. As we get further down the list, cabinet members who wouldn’t fulfil the role as well are more common, such as the Secretary of Agriculture, or the Secretary of Transportation. Even though this may be, they are still actively involved in the President 's affairs, and have a decent understanding on the role of Presidency. Another possible downside to this is the fact that they never had to go through an election process by the electoral college or with popular vote. They were instead appointed by the position …show more content…
The main difference is that the federal bureaucracy works nationally, while the state and county levels are managing their specific area. With each of the levels they are their to fulfill their specific purpose and that is to make a government body run smoothly. They are given the guidelines when new laws/rules are passed down, then this group of experts are there to implement these policies. For example, if a national law had been passed, then the federal bureaucracy specific to the laws interest would be used implement it. The same thing happens at a state level, the only difference is the amount of people this law will affect. Overall, they are there to make the whole process of creating laws achieve its maximum efficiency, without the help of bureaucracy at each level, governing bodies wouldn’t be able to