David Bruck And The Death Penalty

Improved Essays
The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines the death penalty as “execution imposed in court of law as punishment for a crime.” Edward I. Koch, a New York mayor from 1978-1989, supports the death penalty while David Bruck, Harvard College alumni, opposes the death penalty. In the essay “The Death Penalty: Is It Ever Justified?” and “The Death Penalty” both Koch and Bruck talk about the death penalty, yet they both argue the value of life very differently by elaborating their points of view.
Imagine a life where there was no existence of any type of crime. Sadly, we live in a life where crime exists and sometimes we can do something about it and sometimes we cannot. People like Koch and Bruck view justice differently, because Koch states; “We may
…show more content…
As he states; “Some critics of capital punishment, such as columnist Jimmy Breslin, have suggested that a life sentence is actually a harsher penalty for murder than death.’ This is sophistic nonsense” (Koch 486). Koch disagrees with Jimmy Breslin, because he is not convinced that a life sentence in prison is harsher than an execution. While Koch sees a person convicted for murder being executed, Bruck’s idea is to make sure that the convicted murderer has proof of either being guilty or innocent. Bruck believes that it is important to know because there have been cases where innocent people have been executed before. An example of an innocent person who was almost executed was Lenell Jeter. Lenell Jeter was a young black engineer who recently served more than a year of a life sentence for a Texas armed robbery that he didn’t commit. (Bruck 491). This piece of evidence from Bruck’s essay helps to understand that there have been situations where they punish the wrong person. Bruck states, “I don’t claim that executions of entirely innocent people will occur very often. But they will occur” (Bruck 495). Bruck wants assurance that if the death penalty is going to put to action, to at least be sure that the person being convicted of the crime is truly guilty.
Imagine all those people who were executed and were innocent. Like Koch and Bruck, justice should be equal for all, but in Bruck’s defense, justice wouldn’t be equal for all if innocent people were killed for a crime they did not commit and the sad part is that you can’t fix it because they would be already

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    He used these quotes in an attempt to show that the death penalty reinforces the idea that there will be retribution for violent actions. However, Bruck drew on these quotes to point out that they do very little to validate Koch’s reasoning. In fact, they do the very opposite by signifying not only an inmate’s remorse, but also their attempt to point out the flawed logic of the death penalty…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Article Abstract Two: Guilty on All Counts Guilty on All Counts, written by Elizabeth Hull discusses the death penalty and the randomness and inconsistencies of the punishment. The author outlines in the article the many flaws of execution in the United States. There are many arguments about the logistics of this sentence and whether it is a cruel or unusual punishment. First, the article explains how the death penalty is gravely flawed.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nathanson argues that the decision should be made by the majority. He affirms that while some claim that criminals deserve death penalties for their sins, many regard death penalty as a threat to innocent lives instead of the guilty. Because government’s goal of protecting innocent citizens’ lives is more important than executing harmful individuals, governments should go with the majority and stop executions. Nathanson also argues that the cost of death sentences and execution procedures are far more expensive than the benefit of executing criminals. Finally, Nathanson argues that our legal system is not compatible with capital punishment.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ronald Cotton Legal Case

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The American legal system is widely admired for its laudable moral qualities such as liberty, justice, and due process. Americans take great pride in seeing the legal system administer swift and fair penalties to those who have committed crimes. But what happens if the legal system is wrong? What if the person that was sent to prison, or executed by the state, did not commit the crime they were punished for? This was the situation that Ronald Cotton found himself in during the 1980s and 90s serving a life sentence for two rapes he did not commit.…

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the article “The Death Penalty ” by David Bruck the author appeals to audiences with personal experiences through the use of graphic imagery to show how wrong it is to kill people. With the tone of sarcastic he uses to connect with his audiences in order to show a facts What opportunity does it execute in the death penalty? “it was the chair that provided show with celebrity and an opportunity to lecture us on right and wrong.” with this quote the author shares the Death Penalty is seen in different eyes and have right and wrong with different places in the world. it stands for the total abolition of the death penalty but allows states parties to retain the death penalty in time of war some state have already abolishes the death penalty,…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We all have similar and contrasting views on justice, what it is, when it is needed on our side, and how it can be achieved. These views, however, may conflict with each other. Some of us may accept certain circumstances as a part of our daily life, such as the female, while others may argue against them and raise their pitchforks and torches blazing brightly comparable to their righteousness. In the latter scenario, to what extent should we let that righteousness control our actions before we become blinded by it? We seek retribution on criminals who have committed the worst possible felonies, and so, they must be punished accordingly.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wrongful Convictions

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This results in the criminal justice system becoming demoralized. Not only can an innocent person be sentenced to jail but some can be put on death row which can result in the killing of an innocent person. Although these types of cases are rare, occasionally they do happen. Occurrences such as these can result from lack of…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1972 the Supreme Court issued a moratorium on the death penalty. Three years later in 1975 William F. Buckley writes an article that was published in Execution Eve and Other Contemporary Ballads discussing and counter arguing abolitionists about the death penalty and its effects. Buckley writes the article to try and convince people the moratorium must be lifted. Buckley believes it’s better to sacrifice the life of the convicted criminal rather than risk the lives of an unknown amount of innocent people. “If we had certainty, we would not have risks- and we do- better to risk the life of the convicted man than risk the life of an indefinite number of innocent victims who might survive if he were executed.”…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stephen Nathanson, who wrote “An eye for an eye?” suggests the factual and moral beliefs about the death penalty are wrong and need to be strictly abolished. The passage states, “ A person’s actions, it seems, provide not only a basis for a moral appraisal of the person but also a guide to how he should be treated”. Also stated, “ What people deserve as recipients of rewards or punishments is determined by what they do as agents”. The argument claiming people should get a punishment based on what they do is accurate. What is not accurate however, is suggesting if someone murders another person, they should receive capital punishment.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anybody Will Do Punishing criminals has always been a major part of what is considered justice, as the saying goes an eye for an eye. People naturally lean towards that extremely crude form of justice, and so they care about nothing else besides the fact that they get someone’s eye. In The Crucible by Arthur Miller and “Trial by Fire” by David Grann, extreme actions are taken over the deaths of children. People are accused of causing the deaths, yet none are at fault. They are all killed regardless of reason saying otherwise.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Not too long ago, the public was blissfully unaware that innocent people could be convicted of crimes not committed. News coverage has brought a new awareness to this prominent issue. The fact that these…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the past twenty years DNA evidence has come to light that has proven one hundred and fifty three people innocent of the crimes that they were put on death row for committing (Source D). This means that one hundred and fifty three people were almost murdered for crimes that they did not commit. The error that occurs in deciding whether or not a person should be put on death row or not is described in Source D as, “criminal-justice systems are flawed because they rely on human beings who can err through honest mistakes, greed, fraud, and other frailties of the flesh.” Human beings are not perfect and make many mistakes, yet they are trusted to make claims and decisions that are quite literally life or death. Source E pokes fun at this margin of error by presenting a cartoon, stating that less than a quarter of all death penalty cases have no error in them.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The death penalty is a capital punishment where criminals that have been convicted are put to death by the government (Issitt). The death penalty started over 400 years ago in America when George Kendall committed espionage and was sentenced to a hanging in 1608 (Issitt). This…

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a case in 1989, Willie Boskett was tried and convicted of stabbing a guard in prison. He was sentenced to 25 years in jail with parole, since the option of death was not available in New York at that time. The judge was positive that Boskett was going to commit homicide and he stated that in sentencing Boskett, he is essentially sentencing an innocent man to death (Gottfried 31-44). Moreover, there was another case similar to this in 1976. Lamuel Smith had robbed a store and killed the owner and the employee.…

    • 2336 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Two wrongs don’t make a right, right? We’ve all heard that growing up, whether it was from a teacher, a parent or a television show. That saying may be one of the best arguments against death penalty. Can we properly condemn a murderer by committing the same crime against him? It’s necessary to examine why select prisoners end up on death row in certain states in America.…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics