Miller “calls on his characters to take responsibility for their actions, and Miller himself never shies away from his responsibility to act on his own conviction” (Siebold 29). Throughout The Crucible, Miller’s characters are given the opportunity to prevent the Witch Trials from continuing, but each one fails to do so out of fear, pride, or jealousy. Miller judges those who fail to act as equally guilty as those who act unjustly. These are not haughty condemnations by Miller, but rather reflections of the maltreatment he endured during the Second Red Scare. After his failed marriage to Marilyn Monroe, Miller was brought before the HUAC to face Senate hearings on his communist ties. John Elsom notes that Miller “could have escaped [the persecution of HUAC], but he did not want to subject Monroe to unwelcome publicity. He thus shouldered his burden… and turned defeat into a moral victory” (Elsom 102). Rather than shy away from publicly scrutiny, Miller defiantly published his controversial play and accepted the unjust consequences for his actions. This is the same type of responsibility that Miller demands of his characters and expects of the American
Miller “calls on his characters to take responsibility for their actions, and Miller himself never shies away from his responsibility to act on his own conviction” (Siebold 29). Throughout The Crucible, Miller’s characters are given the opportunity to prevent the Witch Trials from continuing, but each one fails to do so out of fear, pride, or jealousy. Miller judges those who fail to act as equally guilty as those who act unjustly. These are not haughty condemnations by Miller, but rather reflections of the maltreatment he endured during the Second Red Scare. After his failed marriage to Marilyn Monroe, Miller was brought before the HUAC to face Senate hearings on his communist ties. John Elsom notes that Miller “could have escaped [the persecution of HUAC], but he did not want to subject Monroe to unwelcome publicity. He thus shouldered his burden… and turned defeat into a moral victory” (Elsom 102). Rather than shy away from publicly scrutiny, Miller defiantly published his controversial play and accepted the unjust consequences for his actions. This is the same type of responsibility that Miller demands of his characters and expects of the American