The Importance Of Constitutional Interpretation Of The Constitution

Decent Essays
“Constitutional interpretation is the process by which meanings are assigned to words in a constitution” (Principles). Today many of the most important issues in the United States are determined through Supreme Court Justices’ interpretations of the Constitution. Surprisingly, however, the method the Court should adopt when confronted with the question of constitutional interpretation has become a point of controversy. Since the ratification of the Constitution, legal scholars and political leaders have clashed on the specifics of interpretation, but none more publicly than Justices of the Supreme Court.
In 1878, Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist #78, “the interpretation of the laws is the proper and particular province of the courts. A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges as, a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to
…show more content…
This group contends that an evolving or “living” interpretation is necessary, and that the framers allowed for this by writing in broad and flexible language. For proponents of the evolving constitution concept, original intent creates an archaic document. Supporters maintain that the Courts should analyze text, history, structure and precedent – but not within a legal vacuum.
Proponents of the originalist theory argue that adhering to original intent limits any one generation from ruling according to the passion of the times. Originalists refer to the framers’ inclusion of the amendment process as the intended method for adapting to societal changes, thus preventing judges from injecting personal values into the interpretations. Through this argument, originalists maintain that the framers recognized the importance of allowing for inevitable changes in society, but also recognized the need to balance popularity with permanent

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Court had the right to review acts of Congress and the actions of the President. If a law was found unconstitutional, the court could overrule it. Marshall wrote, “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” He argued the constitution is the Supreme law of the land and it has the final say over the meaning of the…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A hot debate relevant for today is the question of how the constitution is to be interpreted. When writing the constitution, the founding fathers were clearly living in an ern which entailed concerns that are different from concerns today. During the constitutional convention, men discussed debated until they agree on what should become the framework for our great nation. Because of this the constitution appears to be ambiguous on many particular issues which we face today. Are we then to address those issues in light of the context in which the constitution was written, or are we to view it as a living document that’s meaning changes with time?…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the years, there have been many debates regarding the constitution. One common debate being whether or not the constitution is flexible enough to live through the generations. Jefferson, a founding father, has stated, “The Constitution belongs to the living and not the dead.” This statement does allude to the longevity of the Constitution, as can be demonstrated through the amendment process, the elastic clause, and judicial review. The amendment process has allowed the United States government to amend the Constitution.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For most Americans, the Louisiana Purchase is regarded as one of the most influential treaties of our nation in expanding its borders and securing its status as a world powerhouse in political dominance. However, a significant yet otherwise subdued dilemma the Louisiana Purchase treaty caused was an unconstitutional expansion of federal powers, specifically with regards to the president. Robert Knowles argues that the assumed expansion of federal powers to include additions of states and integration into the union significantly hindered the balance between federal powers and state powers, granting the former much more importance in the “empire of liberty” model.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Under America’s first governing document, the Articles of Confederation, the national government grew weak and states operated like independent countries. In response to this the delegates at the 1787 convention which was originally set to ratify the Articles of Confederation devised a plan for a stronger federal government with three branches–executive, legislative and judicial–along with a system of checks and balances to ensure that no one branch would ever gain too much power. The U.S. Constitution established America’s national government and fundamental laws, while guaranteeing that certain basic rights for its citizens would be established and protected. It was signed on September 17, 1787, by delegates to the Constitutional Convention…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In James Madison’s Federalist 49, written in 1788, he lays out his argument for why constitutional revision should be limited. He believes that, in response to Thomas Jefferson’s idea of frequent revision that being every 19-20 years, that this recurrent change to the constitution would ultimately lead to the people’s intolerance of the government in the sense that they would begin to believe that it was defective and could not be fixed. In the eyes…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    What was once “regarded as the mixture of law, custom, conventions of governance and institutions existing at any one moment” were instead “charters creating institutions that would henceforth act under the authority they bestowed.” Under this view, constitutions were now the law of the land, even placing it above the highest official in the government. Because of this, any law enacted by the government had to fall under the guidelines of the Constitution, and if the law were to fall outside the guidelines, it could be deemed unconstitutional. In “Four Letters Interesting Subjects”, the author attempts to define the word constitution. The author states that constitutions serve two main purposes: 1) to decide what the form of government should be and 2) what powers should the government have.…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of the group’s disagreements, they came to write explanations for their position in essay. These essays came to be known as The Federalist Papers and The Anti-federalist Papers. The Federalist papers had a main reason to convey the interpretation to the new constitution. While the Anti-Federalist Papers was pleading those who still secured their rights to allow discussion over the same document. By reading them, we learn that the Anti-Federalist did not think the new Constitution accurately explained the rights of its…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution: Fixed or Flexible 1.The Death Penalty: Is It Constitutional? How should judges interpret vaguely worded phrases in the Constitution? The act of interpreting vaguely worded phrases in the Constitution should be frequently revised over time, according to Thomas Jefferson, in order to meet the demands of the nation, and to satisfy the public opinion at that certain time.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United States Constitution is one of the shortest, longest standing, and most ambiguous constitutions in the world. This document establishes a democratic republic of many states under one federal government. In outlining the responsibilities and powers of each branch of the government and how they relate to state governments, many questions are left unanswered. Though this constitution outlines legislation’s role fairly clearly, it is far too vague concerning executive and judicial roles and the relationship between state and federal government.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Federalist Alexander Hamilton regarded the Constitution as the fundamental law, which is superior to any state statute, and as a limited Constitution. In Federalist Paper Number 78, Hamilton argues that the Supreme Court should have the authority to invalidate acts of Congress that are deemed unconstitutional, and that if there is a variance between the Constitution and a law passed by Congress, federal courts have the responsibility to follow the Constitution. Paper Number 78, having been cited in thirty-seven Supreme Court opinions as of April 2007, has had an immense influence on the debate regarding the interpretation and application of the Constitution (Coenen). Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is an advocate of textualism, arguing that the meaning of the Constitution lies in the words of the document, and that the Constitution should be regarded in favor of its “original meaning”. Justice Stephen…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Let us now consider the other side of the coin, the argument in favor of a dead Constitution. In 2008; Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas said at the Manhattan Institute, "Let me put it this way; there are really only two ways to interpret the Constitution -- try to discern as best we can what the framers intended or make it up. No matter how ingenious, imaginative or artfully put, unless interpretive methodologies are tied to the original intent of…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America’s long journey of seeking freedom from governmental oppression, the newly formed nation was skeptical when it came to the discussion of new government authority. Many Americans were still uneasy about consolidated power, while others were aware of the prevalent national instability caused by the lack thereof. Though, in the end, the Constitution prevailed and has become the cornerstone of American government, the path that led to this enduring document was gradual and filled with apprehension and debate. Both sides of the issue had very clear and valid notions about either their support or opposition to the Constitution, and in the end were able to find common ground through patience and compromise.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Justice Stephen Breyer Justice Stephen Breyer has been on the Supreme Court for almost 22 years. He was confirmed to the court by the Senate on June 29, 1994. Justice Breyer’s confirmation was not a surprise considering how highly qualified he was, as well as, how highly others thought of him. For most of Breyer’s adult life he has had an influential role in the legal field. This paper will summarize Justice Stephen Breyer’s early life through today.…

    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    J. Cecelia Shaulis April 13, 2015 Pols-Y 211 Dalecki Exam 3- Miranda v. Arizona One of the biggest players in law interpretation and policy-making is the judiciary system. While the other two branches of government have some control over the judiciary system through checks and balances, the federal courts have a great deal of power in the form of judicial review. Judicial review is the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays