Purpose Of Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative

Great Essays
Introduction Immanuel Kant discusses many ethical systems which are based on a belief that the reason is the final authority of morality. The actions of any sort must come from a sense of duty dictated by reason and no action performed solely in obedience to the law or custom can be regarded as moral. Kant described two main systems of command given by reason. Hypothetical Imperative defined by Kant is the formula of the command of reason that represents an objective principle "in so far as it is necessitating for a will.” The Categorical Imperative, probably the most known is defined as an unconditional moral obligation that is binding in all circumstances and is not dependent on a person's inclination or purpose. The purpose of this paper is to teach you about Immanuel Kant’s morality and Kantian Ethics and give you a better understanding of determining your own morality and viewing ethics and if they still are applied today.
Research
Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher born in Prussia in 1724 and lived until 1804. Immanuel Kant is most known for his book The Critique of Pure Reason (Rohlf
…show more content…
This is one reason I believe that this categorically imperative system would not work, you basically have to assume the system is moral from the start. Denying people that are sick or suffering wouldn’t be deemed moral in today’s world, but this still happens in many places in the world. Kant’s categorical imperative could be applied to those cases, but we could possibly feel something inside of us that doesn’t scream that it’s moral. “Good Will” and “Duty” are two terms that Kant uses the most in his book when referring to his morals and the categorical imperative (Aldarondo, C., & Widger, D.) Kant’s common moral concept of these words led him to believe that people are free and autonomous as long as the morality itself is not an

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    How is it that people are to follow through with something without considering the consequences? Immanuel Kant argues that we as people should not act for reasons because if we do, we will be self-contradicting ourselves. He believes that we are being morally irrelevant if we base are wrong doings or right doings with consequences before we choose to do the action. He believes we should be willing to accomplish our duties and tasks without worrying about the aftermath of an action. Kant believes it should be a requirement for us to obey the moral law because it is a noble thing to do.…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant describes the categorical imperative as, “A categorical imperative, which declares an action to be of itself objectively necessary without reference to any purpose hold an apodictic practical principle” (25). While that quote seems confusing, it can be explained quite simply. Kant says that the CI is a set of rules that is to be followed by everyone due to their moral obligations. He goes on to explain that the CI is a necessary action that has an end in itself. Based upon this explanation, one can assume that the categorical imperative could be considered a necessity because it applies to everyone.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We may reason why exactly or the many different scenarios where an action or duty may appear moral at first glance, what W.D. Ross may call “prima facie duties”, but not necessarily after careful consideration. Nevertheless, according to Hume it is that emotional feeling that makes us determine what is right or wrong, morally. Finally, being skeptic there is no surprise David Hume, makes the claim there is no such thing as absolute morality, but all morality judgments are subjective. Immanuel Kant’s view on morality is centered primarily around his notion of duty.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Ethics

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages

    He explains that moral actions must be performed “from duty,” as actions done from duty are driven by the good will alone. Duty, as such, “is the necessity of an action from respect for the [moral] law” (page 16). According to Kant, this moral law is a law of pure reason, inherent to all rational beings. Having provided the basis for his theory, Kant states that “there is nothing left over except the universal lawfulness of the action in general which alone is to serve the will as its principle, i.e., I ought never to conduct myself except so that I could also will that my maxim become a universal law” (page 18). In other words, universal conformity is the only conceivable basis of an action’s moral worth.…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He uses hypothetical imperatives to contrast between categorical imperatives, what he believes morality to be. Categorical imperatives tell us what to do regardless of our desires. Kant believes morality is based on duty and duty is reasoning without a motive, obligation or desire. Kant believes that humans can only decide what is moral through reasoning.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was a German philosopher who influences the modern philosophy. Kant presented that human mind creates decision based on human experience in that reason is the morality source while the time and space forms human sensibility. Kant was able to create the Kantianism framework (Kantian ethics), which is a deontological ethical theory that is premised on Enlightenment rationalism is the good provide the basis of the maxim or principle behind it is based on the moral law. In expanding his theoretical perspective, Kant points towards the categorical imperative that affects on all people without considering the desires and interests of others. Universalizability also presents that permissibility is integral in that all principles…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Eighteenth century German philosopher Immanuel Kant solidified his thoughts on morality, and created a step-by-step, systematic plan for the human being to follow in order to achieve goodness. Kant’s theory has had its impact in the world of philosophy and his categorical…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this paper, I will discuss Kant’s moral reasoning, both broadly and in terms of a case study, and elaborate on some issues with Kantian ethics. The core of Kant’s ideas on morality is his statement that "nothing can possibly be conceived in the world, or even out of it, which can be called good without qualification, except a good will". He defines this good will as “the will which acts from freedom and respect for the moral law”, meaning that one must choose by their own volition to pursue morality. Kant believes the only purely good thing is this idea of good will. In saying this, Kant draws a line between good will and traits like happiness, wealth, and even health that are usually thought to be good.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is a moral law, and you are bound to it no matter what else happens. There is no room to manipulate the laws depending on a situation. “The moral law binds unconditionally. Kant called the statement of the moral law or of the supreme principle of morality, the Categorical Imperative” (DeGeorge 64). The rule of “Do Not Lie” means you cannot lie even if an evil person asks you for information about yourself or a family member.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant offers the categorical imperative theory which basically tell us how to know which actions are right. Therefore, we may be able to know what our moral duties are. Immanuel Kant introduces two key elements of his moral philosophy. The first one, good will as the only thing…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays