Ideally, the subject will not only be fully accountable for but also in control of their actions. By valuing self-fulfillment and personal ideals, the approach satisfies the ideas of most people about what being human means. However, Friedman (2008) had earlier noted that a key weakness of the approach is that it lacks empirical evidence to support its claims. Critics have also argued that its vague concepts are subjective and make it difficult to objectify real and authentic experiences (Greening,
Ideally, the subject will not only be fully accountable for but also in control of their actions. By valuing self-fulfillment and personal ideals, the approach satisfies the ideas of most people about what being human means. However, Friedman (2008) had earlier noted that a key weakness of the approach is that it lacks empirical evidence to support its claims. Critics have also argued that its vague concepts are subjective and make it difficult to objectify real and authentic experiences (Greening,