The Nine Billion Names Of God Analysis

Improved Essays
Arthur C. Clarke couldn’t have chosen a better title for this brilliant science fiction short story. I’m a sucker for a story with a good title. “The Nine Billion Names of God" revolves around Tibetan Buddhist monks who plan to put together a list that consists of all the names of God. The story opens with Dr. Wagner-- he is asked to work on an automatic sequence computer (Mark V.) that can carry out letters by the lama. They need a computer with letters, so they can write the names of God. Obviously, a computer with only numbers won’t be able to carry it out the task. One of the engineers hired by the lama for three months to work on the computer soon figures out what happens once the Tibetan Buddhist monks type down the last name of God. The world ends. That’s pretty much a stock theme in science fiction typically dealing with post-apocalyptic or apocalyptic settings/issues. Nevertheless, eschatology is a common theme in “The Nine Billion Names of God."
***
The conflict is Chuck nor George want to face any blame if what the monks believed that would happen didn’t come to fruition. I liked this part of the story most for a multitude
…show more content…
It’s less to do with technology and more to with society. The setting is a utopia because there is no crime or violence. “The king of the world,” or mischief-maker which is referring to the main character who can do whatever he wants. He is a persona non-grata. People can sense when he is coming because of his odor. They also ignore his existence. The theme is loneliness. He isn’t the king of the world,” he is only king in his world. No sympathy here because the narrator took advantage of this as could be seen in the beginning when he stole a car, harassed the blonde. Plus, he killed his girlfriend and that’s why he is being treated this way in the first place. He wasn’t supposed to commit violence against another person and he did. So is it really a utopia for the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    No one will covet another man or have reason to harm another. Pennsylvanians’ relationships with Indians are exemplary, resulting in very few wars and bloodshed. This colony is self-governed and does not have heavy taxes like England. However, Pennsylvanians still have the rights of an England citizen, such as the right to petition to the king and trial by jury. In addition, the soil is fruitful and has plentiful natural resources ideal for farming and other businesses which will undoubtedly be bought for costly prices.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A person who wishes to lead a contented life leads a life free from gossip and speculations. His clear conscience is his greatest strength. It guides him down the path of righteousness and makes him take the right decisions at all times. c) How does a happy man pray to…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Therefore, he was wrong and the partner was wrong because he should have stopped the car when he hit the guy the first time and made him get in the front with him. The word intention means something intended: an aim or plan (dictionary. reference n.d.). I feel that the partner knew what his intentions were when he got in the back seat with the suspect. Although, the officer that was driving did not know what his intention were at first because he never told him.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ripley Character Analysis

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It flows smoothly with the rest of the story, as it shows how killing Greenleaf allowed him to escape the oppression he received during his time. Consequently, Greenleaf symbolized Ripley’s old life, and when he murdered him, he took over his new life as Greenleaf and discarded his old identity in exchange. It sets the base of why he feels ashamed of his actual identity and fears assumptions of his sexuality, while additionally clarifying what he is fleeing…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With this in mind he confesses and ruins his “perfect crime”. As a matter of fact, the narrator in the “Strawberry Spring” said, “I’ve been thinking about the trunk of my car--such an ugly word, trunk--and wondering why in the world I should be afraid to open it” (King 7). According to that he was scared that he might be the killer. But the truth is he does not remember anything that happened before. However, the narrator of “The Tell-Tale Heart” is more unreliable because he was proud that the crime was clean and there's no marks that can put him in jail.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Myrtle and George, there is no egotism because they do not belong to the upper-class like the majority of the book’s characters do. Because of this, Tom thinks that George is “so dumb he doesn’t know he’s alive” (26). This reveals that the poor and even the middle class are looked down upon and that they are very selfish in nature. However, the cars still do have meaning to the Wilsons. Myrtle is killed in the end of the story by a car that she thought was Tom which is ironic because Tom would be the one to give her the lifestyle that could include cars; cars are not only the symbol of the American dream lifestyle but a deadly instrument that was thrown aside in earlier chapters by Jordan only to reappear and take the life of Tom’s mistress and George’s…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arthur Shawcross does not expressed any remorse or guilt for his actions. During Arthur Shawcross’s interview, he explained somehing “came over” that simply made him kill without thinking (Cater, 1995) Wooing phase phase is the victim is conned into the killer’s trap. Arthur Shawcross was skilled in having conversation with the prosititues about buying sex. Eventually, he led his victims to the Genesee River and murdered them. Moreover, he tricked the prostitutes thinking it was a safe date because he was a regular customer.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Tom freaks out once he figures that his mistress is dead, he uses this opportunity to get rid of all the evidence surrounding his affair with Myrtle by blaming his adultery and the murder on Gatsby and retreating into his rich lifestyle without any inch of regret. Tom says to Nick “what if I did tell him? That fellow had it coming” (Fitzgerald 1993:114). This indicates that Tom felt no regret towards causing the death of Gatsby as he believed he had it coming. Tom used Wilson as a way to get rid of Gatsby by lying and manipulating as he knew Wilson was emotionally fragile at that time and would have done anything to avenge his wife.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Knowing the absurdity of the world, Meursault is not afraid of expressing his opinion on matters concerning him. In fact, Meursault despises dishonesty as we see in the newspaper mentioning the story of a man wanting to surprise his mother and sister with his wealth by concealing his identity, but was killed by them in a robbery by them. Although many would pity this ridiculous death, Meursault thinks that ‘the traveler pretty much deserved what he got and that you should never play games (pg 80).” Another case when he is honest is when Marie ask if he loves her to which he responds that it didn’t matter to him and that he doesn’t love her, and he doesn’t care if they get married. Such a statement could depict Meursault as heartless and incapable of feeling love, but he is just expressing his opinion on the social construct of marriage and the hollow expressions of love. Understanding this, after the initial shock, Marie responds by stating that he is ‘peculiar’ and that ‘that is the reason she loved him’ (pg 42).…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From the beginning of the novel, when Tom has just been released on parole, he does not feel any regret for killing a man. When Jim Casy asks Tom what he had done, Tom replies, “I’d do what I done--again. I killed a guy in a fight” (35). Tom’s morals justify the killing because he does not know any better. In fact, when describing his act of homicide, Tom takes on a bragging tone and shows no regrets.…

    • 1374 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays