The background behind the New York Times vs. Sullivan hinged on if the Times committed libel under Alabama law. Ennis (1964) stated that the Supreme Court ruled that the Times were protected under the free speech of the 1st and 14th Amendment because there was no display of malice. Wasserman (2013) maintains that the Times/Sullivan decision influences both freedom of speech and freedom of the press.
Rotarescu (2014) defines, “on national level, the freedom of expression is provisioned in Article 30 of the Constitution revised in 2003, and Article 70 of the Civil Code in force, reprinted and updated”. Fisher’s (2001) speech remarked about freedom of expression that, “the legal issues implicated by the increasing