Suffragettes Outcast Analysis

History continuously celebrates the struggle women have gone through in order to get to the point that they are in with the many benefits accumulated over the years. In two podcast, they each talk about different aspects of the women suffragette movement. Comparing these two podcasts about the suffragettes, these podcasts are without focusing on the positive and negative are trying to display the whole truth of the movement without withholding anything. These two podcasts are similar in the exposing aspect of the suffragette movement. They both are trying to give more information on a moment in history that is repeatedly glossed over. History frames the suffragette movement as a light and non-terrorizing movement that was affected by slight violence. It is brought up how it is never talked about the bombs and the …show more content…
The topic of the terroristic acts few women of the suffragette movement demonstrated a different side that history tends to hide . The outstanding difference is the History Extra podcast is more so directing closely with a figure named Kitty Marion, who was an actress and activist. The difference is the History Extra podcast is more so directing closely with a figure named Kitty Marion, who was an actress and activist. In History Extra’s, Suffragettes are terrorist, the podcast is inspired by Kitty Marion and the two volumes on her life left in the archives, and it shows the unedited version of being a suffragette, which is what makes it compelling. They also talk in great detail about her life and her involvement, surprisingly violent involvement. The Lost World of the suffragette’s talks about how there is a difference within the movement itself. The difference between being a suffragist and a suffragette is the original activist group was the suffragist ‘polite strategy’ but because of the lack of change and dissatisfaction, later produced the more rowdy