The study by Brooke et al. 1997 showed that sleeping prone was associated with higher odds of SIDS as well as smoking behavior in the mother or the father of the infants. The ODDS associated with sleeping prone was 2.33. In the study by Hauck et al. 2003, the results also showed that sleeping prone increased occurrence of SIDS. The ODD seen in this correlation was 2.4, a figure that is very close to that of the comparison study. In this study, there was also a direct correlation between smoking by the parents and the occurrence of SIDS. Thus, prone position and smoking have been proven to as causes of SIDS from the results of multiple studies. However, the studies have used case-control designs. Comparing the results of case-controls and that derived from other designs like Random Controlled trials (RCTS) it is accurate to say that the latter design has a stronger level of evidence because of minimal bias and errors incurred in the research
The study by Brooke et al. 1997 showed that sleeping prone was associated with higher odds of SIDS as well as smoking behavior in the mother or the father of the infants. The ODDS associated with sleeping prone was 2.33. In the study by Hauck et al. 2003, the results also showed that sleeping prone increased occurrence of SIDS. The ODD seen in this correlation was 2.4, a figure that is very close to that of the comparison study. In this study, there was also a direct correlation between smoking by the parents and the occurrence of SIDS. Thus, prone position and smoking have been proven to as causes of SIDS from the results of multiple studies. However, the studies have used case-control designs. Comparing the results of case-controls and that derived from other designs like Random Controlled trials (RCTS) it is accurate to say that the latter design has a stronger level of evidence because of minimal bias and errors incurred in the research