Stanley Milgram's Obedience Experiment

Improved Essays
Psychologist Stanley Milgram performed his obedience experiment, which would later be repeated, at Yale University in the 1960’s. Milgram’s experiment was based on examining the control that those in authority had over people’s actions, and how far that authority can push a person. Most people listen and obey those put in authority over them. Obedience is defined as “a change in behavior in response to the commands of others”. Although obedience is less common than conformity and compliance in studies, it is is prominent in studies based on obedience to authority. Due to ethical considerations this experiment could not be performed in today’s society.
In the study, an authority figure, would ask an individual to perform tasks that they might not
…show more content…
These reactions included things like the learner calling out in pain and asking for them to stop. In most cases, the teacher would ask “What if we hurt them?” or things of similar nature. Each time, the experimenter would assure them that it was okay, remind them to just do as they are told, and say that any blame would be placed on themselves not the teacher. 65% of the individuals who participated in the study used the highest setting (450 volts) to shock the learner. The highest voltage was reached even as the learner screamed and begged them to stop and to be let go. This experiment has been repeated and criticized countless times over the years. In some ways, it can be viewed as an unethical experiment for many reasons. While, like all other experiments, it has its flaws Milgram’s study can give us an insight on how people think and live their lives. This research project raised question about the ethics of of the scientific field, due the extreme emotional stress placed on the participants. Milgram argued that the question were raised due the somewhat horrifying and unwanted truths of human

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    On the animation or slideshow, there were three main participants which were the authority,the teacher and student. The authority encouraged the teacher to conduct the acts of the experiment as to the student is responsible for memorizing the words. If the student fails, he is then shocked with a progression of high volts. This experiment can be discussed as both ethical and unethical . The people volunteered and were advised of the process which would make the experiment ethical.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second chapter focuses on Stanley Milgram and his controversial experiments on obedience. The first part of the chapter focuses on how Milgram’s experiments involved random volunteers and a few actors. The experiments involved being strapped into an electric chair while another volunteer went into another room filled with a generator and voltage options. If the person strapped into the electric chair fails to answer questions about word association correctly, the other volunteer had to shock them with increasing voltage levels for every subsequent question that was answered incorrectly. They were also instructed not to stop shocking, despite the pleas from the other volunteer.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Obedience to Authority Experiment In 1963 at Yale University, Stanley Milgram held an experiment to test the relationship between obedience to authority and the personal conscience. Stanley Milgram’s obedience experiment was one of the many experiments that caused the gathering of the APA, because of its lack of ethics and an analysis of the experiment provides information that could justify for the genocide acts of World War II. The experiment included 40 male participants who drew straws which determined whether they were the learner or the experimenter. Only this was rigged so that the participant was always the experimenter instead of it being random and thinking they had a choice. They were also introduced to Milgram who was head of this experiment.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Stanley Milgram Outline

    • 3385 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Describe the methodology used, and from this, describe the procedures, steps and recorded findings, both documented and observed, to evaluate the study- including the dependent (DV), independent variables (IV) and behavioural observations documented in regards to participant obedience. Milgram's study was an experiment of controlled observation. The procedure was well standardised and obedience was accurately operationalised. Milgram believed that Obedience was so ingrained in Human minds, and they they tend to conform and obey orders of an authority figure. This was a Laboratory experiment using a self selected sample.…

    • 3385 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The laboratory is an unfamiliar setting for many people and the behavioral atmosphere changes noticeably in this setting. “Because of the anxiety and passivity generated by the setting, the subject is more prone to behave in an obedient, suggestible manner in the laboratory than elsewhere” (Baumrind 90). The situation in the lab was constructed in such a way that obedience was encouraged, stacking the odds against the subject (Baumrind 91). Parker would agree that the setting of an experiment will make volunteers more susceptible to obey commands, but he acknowledged that was not the goal for Milgram’s experiment (Parker 97). In a real-life situation, the subject would have more room to question, to choose, to decide, to disobey.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Perils of Obedience” written by Stanley Milgram and “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience” written by Diana Baumrind are both intriguing articles about Stanley Milgram’s experiments on obedience. Diana Baumrind believes that Stanley Milgram failed at his experiences on obedience rather than succeeded. Stanley Milgram believed that he succeeded on his experiments if an authority figure tells the test subject to do something then the test subject will. “Stanley Milgram designed an experiment that forced participants either to violate their conscience by obeying the immoral demands of an authority figure or to refuse those demands” (Milgram 77). While both authors address experiments on obedience, Stanley Milgram approaches…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Milgram’s essay “The Perils of Obedience,” he states “the real focus of the experiment is the teacher” (692). During the process there was a teacher, student, and experimenter, the students were hired actors. The experiment consisted of the teacher giving the student words in which the learner had to repeat them back, and if they got them wrong they would be shocked and the voltage would elevate with each wrong answer. Throughout the process and various teachers, Milgram saw different reactions, only one stood up for the learner refusing to proceed based on the learner’s reactions, another laughed uncontrollably, and the rest followed orders with no remorse regardless of how the student reacted (Milgram 695). Milgram’s point was “to extricate himself from this plight, the subject must make a clear break with authority” (693).…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article "The Perils of Obedience," Stanley Milgram describes what, in his opinion, was an ethical experiment performed at Yale University designed to test how ordinary people respond to authority figures' direct orders, even if the orders violate the test subjects' conscience. In order to prevent psychological damage, Milgram's test subjects were reconciled with their victims after the experiment was terminated; he also claims there was an attempt to reduce tensions that resulted from the experiment (Baumrind 92). Overall, Milgram's findings led him to believe that people struggle to resist orders from authority figures for fear of disappointing said figure, and that a person will assume responsibility for their actions so long as they…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Milgram selected many people at random and split them into the teacher and the learner roles. The teacher would read a set of words to the learner, if the answer was wrong a shock was exerted to the learner. As the experiment continued, the voltage would go up. The teachers did not…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two psychological experimenters attempted to uncover the most brutal area of the human brain in their articles: Milgram 's "The Perils of Obedience" and Zimbardo 's "The Stanford Prison Experiment". The first and earliest of these experimenters was Stanley Milgram, who conducted his experiments at Yale University. He starts the article with information on testing whether or not a person would administer painful—and eventually lethal—shocks to other people when given the order by an authoritative person in the room with the ‘teacher’. His results were indeed surprising: twenty-five people out of forty administered lethal shocks when instructed. He includes excerpts from the experiment to add to his argument.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main conflict of Milgram 's experience which can be argued for both sides, that really settled the point where the experiment became unethical was the fact that patients could be considered to be psychologically harmed, even though the debriefing and explanations it could still have an effect on patient mind and…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Milgram’s obedience study has been around for decades and still holds up its reputation as one of the better known studies. Almost everyone who has taken an introductory class to psychology has experienced the method that Milgram used to test obedience in his human participants. Milgram (1963) used forty male participants who were between the ages of twenty and fifty in the New Haven vicinity. These participants had responded to a newspaper advertisement and direct mail solicitation for what they believed was a study of memory and learning at Yale University. Education level and occupation of the participant ranged from one end of the spectrum to the other.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s experiment on obedience to authority is one of the best known studies in social psychology. It was repeated several times in different variations. These replications extended our knowledge about the phenomenon of complying to authorities’ orders. One of them was the experiment conducted by Hofling et al. This essay will outline the similarities and differences between these two studies.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical guidelines are crucial in research to minimise unnecessary physical or psychological harm to participants in an experiment. Before ethical guidelines existed in research, several experiments were not conducted ethically. In 1963, American psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted Milgram’s Study of Obedience investigating participants' obedience towards authority. The study demonstrated multiple ethical issues which proved the importance of ethics in research. This report will address the ethical principles that Milgram's study covered poorly and how they could be modified to improve the study.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Baumrind often disagreed with the ethics of the Milgram Experiment; however, Ian Parker took on a different perspective than she. Diana Baumrind, author of, Review of Stanley Milgram 's Experiments on Obedience, claims in his experiments the ethics he possessed were immoral and wrong. Throughout her article she continually disagreed with everything Milgram had "achieved", starting from the first experiments results which appeared as a review in American Psychologist in 1963 (Baumrind 89). While Diana disputed what she thought was the atrocious ethics of Milgram 's experiments, she furthermore believed Milgram should have debriefed the subjects more than what he had done (95). Although Baumrind opinionated her thoughts on these issues,…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays