Stanley Milgram Experiment Essay

Improved Essays
Show More
Obedience to Authority Experiment
In 1963 at Yale University, Stanley Milgram held an experiment to test the relationship between obedience to authority and the personal conscience. Stanley Milgram’s obedience experiment was one of the many experiments that caused the gathering of the APA, because of its lack of ethics and an analysis of the experiment provides information that could justify for the genocide acts of World War II.
The experiment included 40 male participants who drew straws which determined whether they were the learner or the experimenter. Only this was rigged so that the participant was always the experimenter instead of it being random and thinking they had a choice. They were also introduced to Milgram who was head of this experiment. There were two rooms that were used for the experiment. One room was used for the experimenter and the teacher to administer the electric shock through …show more content…
The experimenter, Milgram, first asked the teacher to please continue, then states that the experiment requires them to continue, after that milgram says that it is essential for the teacher to continue and lastly he tells them that they have no other choice than to continue. Stanley Milgram's experiment provided essential insight on the reason why the acts of genocide of World War II were committed (Milgram). This final stage of the experiment goes against the ethical code of the volunteers right to withdraw from the experiment. This ethics code means the participant has the right to backout of the experiment at any point (Ethical). Milgram would have broken this code when he refused to let any of the participants who wanted to stop to stop the experiment. Milgram did argue that the denial of ending the experiment was crucial If the ethical code of the participants right to withdraw was in place when the experiment was conducted Milgram would have broken it and his experiment would have been

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Summary Of The Perils Of Obedience By Diana Baumrind
    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary Of The Perils Of Obedience By Diana Baumrind

    He received a large amount of negative feedback saying his experiments were unethical and inappropriate. "Review of Stanley Milgram's Experiments on obedience" by Diana Baumrind mainly critiques Milgram's ethical stance in the experiment by stating that his manner is detached and objective (Baumrind 91). She quotes information…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Critique Of Stanely Milgram's Experiments
    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Critique Of Stanely Milgram's Experiments

    On the animation or slideshow, there were three main participants which were the authority,the teacher and student. The authority encouraged the teacher to conduct the acts of the experiment as to the student is responsible for memorizing the words. If the student fails, he is then shocked with a progression of high volts. This experiment can be discussed as both ethical and unethical . The people volunteered and were advised of the process which would make the experiment ethical.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Stanley Milgram's Obedience
    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Stanley Milgram's Obedience

    Milgram’s Obedience Study Milgram’s original motive for executing this ethics breaking experiment was to learn why the German people allowed the murder of millions of Jewish people during the Holocaust. Stanley Milgram wanted to learn as to how people can listen to authority and break their personal morals to follow someone that they believe to be control. During the Holocaust, Nazis led a massacre of millions of Jewish people without letting personal values, such as compassion, stop them from committing this crime. In a general perspective, Milgram wanted to understand the effect of authority and how far people would go to obey authority under extremely conflicting circumstances. If I were placed in this experiment under the teacher position,…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram Obedience Experiment
    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Milgram Obedience Experiment

    The Milgram Obedience Experiment, a series of experiments originating from July 1961, serves as one of the most significant and influential experiments done in history due to its investigation of the conflict between obligation and obedience to authority and personal morality. The experiment was conducted by Stanley Milgram, an American social psychologist that primarily explored social behavior but is best known for the way he tackled the issue of the true power and influence of figures in authority after the Holocaust. Due to the shock of many at the discovery that human beings were capable of such horrible things during the Jewish genocide of World War II, the Milgram Experiment was conducted to identify exactly how the horrible acts of…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Comparing Stanley Milgram's Underlying Connection Between Obedience And The Holocaust
    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Comparing Stanley Milgram's Underlying Connection Between Obedience And The Holocaust

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, began an experiment in July 1961 that would drastically alter society’s perception of obedience. Milgram formulated a test to comprehend how far people would perform when coerced into obeying an authoritative figure. The experiment involved subjects being tricked into believing they were electrically shocking another individual; physical and emotional harm to the subjects was followed, resulting from the extreme tension they encountered. Ultimately, Milgram thought he found an underlying connection between his experiment and the Holocaust. The study manufactured mixed reactions from society.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Summary Of The Perils Of Obedience By Stanley Milgram
    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Summary Of The Perils Of Obedience By Stanley Milgram

    One particular author that analyzes Milgram's experiment and his lack of consideration for his subjects is Diana Baumrind in her article, "Review of Stanley Milgram's Experiments on Obedience. " Baumrind describes the futile effects of Milgram's experiments and the traumatic, emotional disturbances as unnecessary and harmful toward the test subjects (Baumrind 92). She also includes how Milgram's experiment is not an accurate model to any real-life situations, let alone have any comparative connection to Hitler's German Officers and the Holocaust (Baumrind 93). She concludes with how she believes in the experiment that the subjects should have been fully informed of the emotional and psychological dangers before involving themselves to be apart of the test (Baumrind 94).…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Purpose Of Milgram's Obedience
    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Purpose Of Milgram's Obedience

    The primary purpose of the Milgram's obedience/electroshock experiment was to test people's obedience to authority. I feel the test was able to fulfill its objectives. It was successful because it should that the majority of people tested were willing to fully accept, with some reservations, what a authority figure instructed them to do. In The Real World by Ferris and Stein (2008), we are told that to conducted the experiment a system was set were a research subject was assigned being a teacher and then two others who were administering the test would join, one as experimenter, the other as a learner. The teacher was then shown the learner being strapped to a chair and electrodes being attracted to there body.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Stanley Milgram Outline
    • 3385 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Stanley Milgram Outline

    The experimenter then took the learner (Mr Wallace) a separate room and strapped him into the chair and then attached his wrists to the shock plates. The teacher was allowed to watch this preparation and heard that Mr Wallace had a heart problem which…

    • 3385 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Perils Of Obedience In A Few Good Men By Aaron Sorkin
    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Perils Of Obedience In A Few Good Men By Aaron Sorkin

    A Few Good Men was written by Aaron Sorkin and it is about a lawyer trying to defend two marines accused of murder. The two marines claimed to have received an order to discipline another marine and killed him in the process. The lawyer, Lt. Daniel Kaffee, then has to gather evidence for this claim and eventually get Colonel Jessep to state he gave the marines the order. The story encompasses many factors of obedience to authority and peer pressure and shows what can happen when orders are followed blindly. Many experiments and studies have taken place to explain why people follow orders even if it might violate their morals and result in someone getting hurt.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Experiment In The Perils Of Obedience By Stanley Milgram
    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Experiment In The Perils Of Obedience By Stanley Milgram

    He claims that the subject needed a clearer way to disobey to improve this experiment. Milgram would argue that in real life scenarios no one tells you that you can disobey if you want, it is up to the individual if they certainly feel uncomfortable and uneasy to stand up for their morals. An article over Milgram and his experience from Wayne State University’s psychology department would logically bring attention to the credentials of Yale University and how that may affect the subjects’ thoughts: Why would you think that a large highly regarded university performs potentially dangerous experiments to random volunteers (Wayne State)? It discusses how this is a relevant factor in the subjects decision making. Milgram would state that the Nazis were in the same boat.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Perils Of Obedience Stanley Milgram Analysis
    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Perils Of Obedience Stanley Milgram Analysis

    Both writers have a different view over ethics as some might say Stanley Milgram believes that his experiment is fine and not inhumane; however he believes that he has conducted this experiment for science. Even though some test subjects such as “Gretchen Brandt, a Yale Medical Technician who works at Yale, asks throughout the experiment, ‘Shall I continue?’” (79 Milgram). Some might think that Stanley Milgram does not care about how the test subject feels until the end of the experiment. Which is true according to himself during the experiment if the test subject asks if he or she shall continue after the person getting shocked asks to stop, The experimenter says countless times “The experiment requires that you go on" (Milgram 79). Some might think that Stanley Milgram is an awful person for making these people go through such harsh choices on what is the right thing, Stanley Milgram states that “the subjects do not derive satisfaction from inflicting pain, but they often like the feeling they get from pleasing the experimenter" (86…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Stanley Milgram's The Perils Of Obedience
    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stanley Milgram's The Perils Of Obedience

    According to the questionnaire Milgram sent to the participants, 84% said they were pleased that they had participated in the experiment, roughly 15% were neither pleased nor regretful, and approximately 1% of participants regretted their involvement (Baumrind 95). With these results, Milgram would also likely refute Baumrind’s claims by retorting that either the experiment was not emotionally damaging in the first place, or that the reconciliation he arranged between the participant and actor was sufficient to alleviate the emotional damage. Based on his article “Experimental Ethics,” Ph.D. Alan C. Elms would agree with Milgram, and claims the additional measures Milgram took to ensure the participants’ welfare were unprecedented in most other psychological experiments: Milgram arranged for a psychiatrist to meet with the participants a year later, and no signs of harm were reported (Elms). If Baumrind’s claim that Milgram’s efforts to alleviate emotional damage were not sufficient, then the survey Milgram sent to participants would reveal that a significantly larger percentage of participants regretted their involvement; however, the results prove otherwise, rendering Baumrind’s argument invalid and therefore ineffective while Milgram’s claims are effective with Elms and the survey results supporting his…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanley Milgram Experiment
    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Stanley Milgram Experiment

    The first regulation breached by The Milgram Experiment was Informed Consent. Informed Consent means that the participants must know that they are involved in research and must give their consent or permission. The participants consented to the experiment without knowing the true aims of the experiment. According to Lewis W. Brandt, a Canadian psychologist from the University of Saskatchewan Regina Campus “Subjects and experimenters perceived themselves as participants in a scientific investigation. The subjects had been told by an authority whom they had reason to believe that they were not causing any permanent damage.”…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram's Experiment Essay
    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Milgram's Experiment Essay

    The main conflict of Milgram 's experience which can be argued for both sides, that really settled the point where the experiment became unethical was the fact that patients could be considered to be psychologically harmed, even though the debriefing and explanations it could still have an effect on patient mind and…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram Experiment: Social Influence Of Obedience
    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Milgram Experiment: Social Influence Of Obedience

    However, in today’s society, his experiment would not be able to come in to play as from the American Psychological Association (APA), Milgram’s experiment would have violated the 5th principle which is: Tap into ethics resources — Principle A: Beneficence and Nonmaleficence. This was to ensure that whomever the scientists work with would receive no harm. However, many of the participants went through a psychological trauma, thinking that they might have killed the learner in the process of this study. Modern ethics also asserts that participants of any experiments must not be deceived and be made aware of any consequences. At the end of the experiment, Milgram was criticized for it due to the extreme emotional stress inflicted on the participants.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings