Stanley Milgram's Experiments On Obedience: Chapter Analysis

Improved Essays
The second chapter focuses on Stanley Milgram and his controversial experiments on obedience. The first part of the chapter focuses on how Milgram’s experiments involved random volunteers and a few actors. The experiments involved being strapped into an electric chair while another volunteer went into another room filled with a generator and voltage options. If the person strapped into the electric chair fails to answer questions about word association correctly, the other volunteer had to shock them with increasing voltage levels for every subsequent question that was answered incorrectly. They were also instructed not to stop shocking, despite the pleas from the other volunteer. Milgram believed that the purpose of this experiment was to understand the concept of obedience, as the actors in the experiment were dressed up as doctors in …show more content…
The reason Joshua decided to stop the experiment was because he thought he had a heart problem. In terms of Joshua’s background, he was in the army and took part in World War II. Although the army carries the connotation of obedience, Slate believes that “ how a subject acts in the laboratory does not necessarily generalize to how he or she will act in situations outside the laboratory, which is a whole different” (53). The other subject that Slater talks to is a person with the code name of Jacob Plumfield. He was one of the volunteers that obeyed the entire experiment. The experiment forever changed Jacob as it “caused me [him] to confront my [his] own compliance and really struggle with it” (59). After the experiment, Jacob came out and also understood how pathetically vulnerable “I [he] was to authority” (59). Milgram’s experiments were very controversial, resulting in many critics and detractors of his work such as Daniel Jonah Goldhagen. Ultimately, Stanley Milgram lost his legitimacy as a psychologist and had a hard time picking up a new

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Stanely Milgram was a social phycologist who conducted an experiment in 1963 about nonviolent people being capable of hurting others due to obeying the authority under pressure despite their feeling of remorse. The way the experiment received progression was by having people play the role of a teacher and a learner. The teacher obeys the authority and the learner had to memorize a certain amount of words. If the learner failed to the duty, he would received a punishment of a dose of high voltage shock. Although the purpose of the experiment was to test how the learner was capable of learning, it to was to test the capability of the teacher to continue the experiment whether or not they felt guilt.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s Obedience Study Milgram’s original motive for executing this ethics breaking experiment was to learn why the German people allowed the murder of millions of Jewish people during the Holocaust. Stanley Milgram wanted to learn as to how people can listen to authority and break their personal morals to follow someone that they believe to be control. During the Holocaust, Nazis led a massacre of millions of Jewish people without letting personal values, such as compassion, stop them from committing this crime. In a general perspective, Milgram wanted to understand the effect of authority and how far people would go to obey authority under extremely conflicting circumstances. If I were placed in this experiment under the teacher position,…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The goal of this paper is to review and analyze the article written by Stanley Milgram in 1963. This experiment was considered to be one of the most acknowledged research in the history of social psychology that revealed the unpredicted side of human nature. The author described the tendencies of obedience as inevitable part of our lives, particularly since we live in the complex systems of society where human interaction is unavoidable. He illustrated that this specific tendencies of human behavior was extremely relevant at this specific time in history, during which millions of innocent lives had systematically been lost through wars and fascist movements. It is clearly evident that the author became deeply curious about the nature of “obedience”…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There was a teacher and a learner in this experiment; the learner was put in an electric chair and every answer he would get wrong he would receive a higher shock voltage from the teacher. An analysis of the “Obscura” chapter is that it challenges us how to respect our authority, the power somebody in a white coat has over a college student, and overall obedience to authority. Stanley Milgram wanted to study obedience to authority in 1961, and at the time he was a twenty-seven year old Yale assistant professor of…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Milgram Obedience Experiment, a series of experiments originating from July 1961, serves as one of the most significant and influential experiments done in history due to its investigation of the conflict between obligation and obedience to authority and personal morality. The experiment was conducted by Stanley Milgram, an American social psychologist that primarily explored social behavior but is best known for the way he tackled the issue of the true power and influence of figures in authority after the Holocaust. Due to the shock of many at the discovery that human beings were capable of such horrible things during the Jewish genocide of World War II, the Milgram Experiment was conducted to identify exactly how the horrible acts of…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Perils of Obedience” written by Stanley Milgram and “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience” written by Diana Baumrind are both intriguing articles about Stanley Milgram’s experiments on obedience. Diana Baumrind believes that Stanley Milgram failed at his experiences on obedience rather than succeeded. Stanley Milgram believed that he succeeded on his experiments if an authority figure tells the test subject to do something then the test subject will. “Stanley Milgram designed an experiment that forced participants either to violate their conscience by obeying the immoral demands of an authority figure or to refuse those demands” (Milgram 77). While both authors address experiments on obedience, Stanley Milgram approaches…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Baurind Experiment Analysis

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    Because the experiment takes place in a laboratory, Baumrind argues that participants will not act how they might in the real world. She states that the laboratory is an unaccustomed setting for a typical being and may cause anxiety and passivity (225). Correspondingly, Saul Mcleod, a psychologist who summarizes and critiques Milgram’s experiment, states that the “important” location of the experiment, obedience levels increased (Simply Psychology). The point about setting is one in which Baumrind and Parker are able to reach a consensus.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, shares his results from an experiment he conducted in regards to obedience of authority in 1963 in, “The Perils of Obedience.” His experiment illustrated that when put under particular circumstances, ordinary citizens have the capability to perform terrible and unexpected actions (Milgram 85). Milgram rationalizes these proceedings through the conclusion that the average individual will decide to please the experimenter rather than resist his authority to protect the wellbeing of the learner (Milgram 86). Diana Baumrind, a psychologist who worked at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California, writes in response to Milgram’s experiment “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments…

    • 1334 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    She argues that the experiment was affecting the participant even after they were done and had been de-briefed of what the study was actually about, as well as seeing and talking to the ”learner” (the guy who they thought they were electrocuting). Baumrind was also arguing the fact the the experiment had little ecological validity as subjects are more prone to abide in such environments, she also states that participants experienced long-term, negative psychological consequences as a result of their participation in Milgram’s experiment. Milgram had counterpoints for all of her statements, explaining himself and his thought process and why it was necessary towards the experiment. Baumrind says that Milgram 's experimental situations are not sufficiently accurate models of real-life experience, his sampling techniques are seldom of a scope which would justify the meaning with which he would like to endow his result, as well as result are hard to reproduce. These combined is considered unethical, as this experiment would never have been accepted by any institutions today.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The experimenter in Milgram’s study was present in the same room where a participant was performing his task. Moreover, if the participant expressed doubts regarding further continuation, the experimenter would encourage him to continue four times using phrases such as ‘Please continue’ or ‘It is absolutely essential that you continue’ (1963 cited in Banyard, 2012). In Hofling et al.’s experiment the authority commanded the participants through a telephone and asked them to carry out the order before the authority arrived to the hospital. As the further Milgram’s research on different variations of his experiment shows, the presence of an authority is an important factor increasing the impact of obedience to…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people may be scared to say they want to stop and leave the experiment. The second article talks about how “the experiments also make us aware of how easily unobtrusive situational factors can tap our susceptibilities to obedience, cruelty, or indifference to others’ welfare, thereby empowering us to change ourselves for the better. This provides fresh insight into the psychology and character of the obedient Milgram subjects, and I use this insight to argue that pusillanimity, as Aristotle conceives of it, is part of a complete explanation of the behavior of the obedient Milgram subjects”…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s experiments created great controversy. They showed how vulnerable humans were to the will bending power of authority. This idea especially stuck around the time the experiment took place, the early 1960’s. America was still somewhat fresh off of World War II, and Americans were shocked to see that they were just as capable of being pushed to do things that went against their morals as Germans were under Nazi authorities. Milgram was thorough in his studies by including multiple permutations of the original where he tested subjects responses to different forms of authority.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    NAME: TAY CHEE SIN STUDENT ID: 1001231566 Directed Self Learning Milgram’s Obedience Experiment The Milgram’s Obedience experiment was one of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology. This was a series of experiments conducted by Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University in 1963, 1964 and 1965.…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Milgram study of obedience placed volunteers in a simple, yet difficult situation. The participates believed their involvement was for the scientific research for human memory. The subjects had to inflict an electric shock towards the receiver for any wrong answer in a series of questions. The electric shock would grow in intensity until the high and most dangerous voltage potentially injuring or killing the receiver. However, the experiment was a ruse with actors and fake equipment.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Baumrind argued that after each subject walked out of the experiment Milgram 's approach to reconcile the distraught they had been through was unconvincing (92). Martyn Shuttleworth, author of Milgram Experiment Ethics, often talked how emotionally stressful this experiment was for people. Shuttleworth correlates in her article that there indeed were long term side effects of this taunting experiment (Shuttleworth). While Baumrind implied there should have been a greater amount of a debriefing process, Ian Parker agreed with how the debriefing process occurred (Parker 99).…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays