Stanford Prison Experiment

Improved Essays
Psychologist conduct experiments in order to have a better understanding on how the human brain works. There are four different types of experiments; experimental, quasi experiment, qualitative, and quantitative. Both of the experiments we chose are considered to be experimental. The two experiments we chose are the Stanford Prison Experiment, and the effects of change blindness on the human brain.
“Change Blindness is a failure to detect that an object has moved or disappeared and is the opposite of change direction,” according to Eysenck and Keane, (2005). In a study by Simons and Levin (1998) they had volunteers conduct a discussion with a random person. During the conversation, a quick utterance took place when an object came between
…show more content…
In teams of three the guards worked eight hour shifts. After thirty six hours, Zimbardo talked about one person saying “He has gone completely crazy”. It got so serious they had to let him go. This experiment was stopped by Christina Maslach. This was Zimbardo's girlfriend. Zimbardo finally called the experiment off and it turned out that the experiment had also been used to illustrate cognitive dissonance theory and the power of authority. The results of this experiment favored situational attribution. This meant that the situation rather than the individual personalities caused the behavior. The participants adapted to their roles more than Zimbardo had …show more content…
Zimbardo, “More than 70 applicants answered our ad and were given diagnostic interviews and personality tests to eliminate candidates with psychological problems, medical disabilities, or a history of crime or drug abuse. Ultimately, we were left with a sample of 24 college students from the U.S.” Many of the college students did not think anything about it because their brain was not able to fully comprehend everything going on around them due to the change blindness. After going through the study, the volunteer’s way of perception changed. They saw life in a different point of view than the before. Beforehand, the volunteers were just college students looking to make some extra money, after the experiment they now have the feeling of what it was like to be in prison and lived life in a new way which would not send them back. Change blindness played a role in the Stanford Prison Experiment because the volunteer’s lives were altered, but not so dramatically to where they could tell

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Imagine you are a student at Stanford University in the 1970s, and you hear that a psychologist is offering $15 per day to take part in his experiment. You figure that you could use the extra cash and figure that it’s a good way to help out. You and 20 other students are accepted to participate, and you are split into two groups, prisoners and guards. The only instructions given were “...do whatever they thought was necessary to maintain law and order in the prison and to command the respect of the prisoners. No physical violence [is] permitted.”…

    • 1926 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1971, an experiment took place in Stanford, California. It was named the Stanford Prison Experiment, lasting what was meant to be two weeks, but due to the brutality of the trial, lasted a mere 6 days. Its purpose was to conduct a study on humanity and show just how evil a human can get when given a position of power. To summarize the experiment, a random 18 men were chosen, all innocent, good people who’d never committed a crime. They were divided into two groups erratically: 9 being “prisoners” and 9 being “guards.”…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zimbardo’s account of the Stanford Prison experiment provides his intent to determine whether the power of the situation or another unknown variable sourced report of brutality in prisons. The Stanford prison experiment allowed Zimbardo to embark on a six-day prison experiment to determine the control a prison environment possesses over the human psyche. Zimbardo examines the power of situations to alter ordinary men into sadistic machines, and Szegedy-Maszak provides a logical explanation for heinous actions; however, Zimbardo and Szegedy-Maszak fail to factor in individual responsibility and the perils of dehumanization. Both Szegedy-Maszak and Zimbardo agree that certain situations maintain the power to turn ordinary people into monsters or sadists. Szegedy-Maszak states that the feelings and turmoil of the soldiers were “exacerbated by difficult living conditions and constant danger” (Szegedy-Maszak 76).…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    WHY WAS STANFORD’S PRISON EXPERIMENT CONDUCTED? In order to study psychological effects of prison life a experiment was conducted called “Stanford Prison Experiment”. The psychologists wanted to study what were the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or prison guard. To do this experiment, a team of researchers led by the famous psychology professor named, “Philip Zimbardo” finally decided to set up a replicated prison so that they can carefully note effects of the behavior of all those within the walls of prison.…

    • 2257 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zimbardo says that the experiment showed that power corrupts and that the victims of the abuse had a hard time standing up for themselves. Zimbardo himself experienced this since he was playing the roles of both himself and that of the prison’s superintendent which he states he wouldn’t do the again. He explains that he would have someone else be the prison’s superintendent while he supervised so that he wouldn’t lose himself in the role again. It wasn’t until a colleague of his saw the boys playing the roles of prisoners marching down the hall in chains with bags over their heads that Zimbardo saw just how far this experiment had gone and how into the role he himself had gotten. Even he fell into the conformity of his role even though he wasn’t one of the guards ordering around the prisoners or one of the prisoners having to be obedient to the guards.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This could be compared to Zimbardo’s experiment because once he separated the subjects to half guards and half prisoners relationships went out the window. The Guards had so much power they lost the will to care for…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Evil In Lord Of The Flies

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The prisoners were treated as a real inmate would be, they wore uniforms, ate prison food, and slept in cells. On the other hand the guards wore reflective sunglasses, uniforms, and conducted daily activity in the “prison”. This experiments effects set into place so quickly that what was meant to last for two weeks only lasted six days due to the extreme effects on both the prisoners and the guards. In an interview with The New York Times Magazine Zimbardo states, “They start off playing a game, and then there is a point at which they each, one by one, flip and become more and more extreme.” (Zimbardo).…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The experiment started off with the volunteers adopting their roles quickly and easily, with guards exercising control, and the prisoners being compliant. Soon, the prisoners began adopting realistic behavior where they would abandon their solidarity and seek to benefit from other inmates infringements. With the prisoners being dehumanized with pointless orders, insults, boring jobs, and physical punishment (push-ups), it was clear that the guards began to act tyrannical in their environment. On the mere second day, there was a rebellion. Prisoners ripped off their numbers and barricaded their doors to seek protection and distance to insult and mock the guards.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the past there have been experiments conducted that have done more harm and little to no good. There is a line that can be crossed between a toll being taken for the greater good versus people being exploited and put in harm’s way. There can be a larger benefit to society for the sacrifice that people have made. However, there are several experiments that cross that line and have little to no benefit to society or the greater good. People should not suffer for trivial findings, nor should people be treated in an unethical way for an experiment.…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to obtain candidates for the experiment, an advertisement was placed in the newspaper for anyone who wanted to participate in the study of how life was in prison. Seventy-five men were interviewed for the roles, but of those seventy-five, only twenty-four were chosen. They were selected at random to take and perform the roles of either prison guards or inmates. The experiment was meant to last two weeks’ time, but at the end of just six days, it was apparent that it should come to a close. Phil Zimbardo, the conductor of this experiment, was a teacher of psychology at the university.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mind Tyrant Analysis

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    However, circumstantial factors created by the experiment established a faux authority where students viewed these actions as appropriate. “If Hitler asked you…” the “teacher,” influenced by authority, applied negative reinforcement by shocking the “learner” for each wrong answer. The study was originally conducted under the hypothesis that Germans have a character flaw to obey authority without question, “no matter what outrageous acts the authority commands.” The results showed that most human beings act uncharacteristically when endowed with circumstantial…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    On August 14, 1971 Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment called the Stanford Prison Experiment took off. Young men were offered $15 a day to take part in a mock prison experiment in the basement of the Stanford University Psychology Department. The men were divided into either prison guards or prisoners, this experiment was only to last two weeks. Upon the prisoners arrival at the make shifted prison they were stripped off their clothes and sprayed with disinfecting spray. Each prisoner was issued a dress as a uniform with their prison identification number on the back and front.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1973, Philip Zimbardo, a professor of psychology at Stanford University conducted a summer experiment showing how humans in would react towards being in closed in a prison environment. He recruited college students and offered to pay them, too many it was more interesting than a summer job. The experiment was supposed to continue for two weeks and the participants would be divided into two group’s containing prisoners and guards. As volunteering prisoners of this experiment they would have to get use to their privacy being violated, as well as being harassed. Zimbardo’s wanted to find out the how long it would take for the prisoners and guards to conform to the roles they were classified as.…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main psychologist that conducted this experiment’s name is Philip Zimbardo and he was one of the psychologist’s at Stanford University. The people that took part in this experiment were all students at Stanford and they got paid $15 a day if they did the experiment. The main psychologists in this experiment interviewed the…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deception plays a key and controversial role in the ethics of psychological research. In psychology, deception occurs either when information is withheld from participants (omission) or when participants are intentionally misinformed about an aspect of the research (commission). This essay will explore whether participants in psychological experiments should ever be deceived regarding the true nature of the experiment. This will be analysed by discussing the arguments for and against deception using some controversial case studies in research. Non deceptive methods of research do not always allow researchers to explore true findings.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays