Paul Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment

Improved Essays
STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT
Stanford Prisoner Experiment Dr. Paul Zimbardo was a physiologist at a Stanford University Professor. He took interest in the nature of prisoners and prison guards. He was interested in finding out if the brutality among prison guards was because of their personalities, or if it was a result of the prison environment. He hypothesized that it wasn 't the nature of the guards that made them brutal, it was the roles that they were expected to play that lead to their brutal and violent nature. To test his hypothesis Dr. Paul Zimbardo set up an experiment. He converted the basement of the psychology section in Stanford University into a replica of a jail. Then he found twenty-four young middle aged men to be a part
…show more content…
If the prison system has the ability to turn good people into bad, then what hope can we expect from prisoners to go from bad to good? This is why despite many years in jail, offenders often continue to do their crimes. Further is was also evident that the prisoners were facing mental breakdown and going in stress and depression in only six days. If a criminal is jailed for twenty years, what will be his or her mental state when they leave? Once again they are likely to do crimes because not only have many of them lost everything they had before going to jail, but their mental state is so broken that they will do anything they can to rejoin society and often times that is accomplished by joining gangs. Since the highest crime rates are in the poverty parts of the cities, we should work on fixing the problem before it beings. Creating a nice environment with perhaps police watched regularly in a high crime rate area of a city will make it more difficult for criminals to arise. It would also create safer environments for criminals coming back from jail to return to (if they choosing to go …show more content…
When given power, only a few people can actually control it and not be blinded by it. That was seen when the guards used their power gained from their position to rule the prisoners to their own pleasurment. It shows that humans can not only reach achievements like creating satellites or surgery machines, but they also are capable of sadistic acts done for pleasure and a sense of superiority. Even if the experiment was a role play, it is real elsewhere and people begin to become the roles that society expects, such as the guards in this experiment. It is important to remember our moral and be strong-minded when put in situations that may ask us to go against it. As Kurt Vonnegut once wrote, “We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful what we pretend to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Like Lord of the Flies, the experiment presented set rules and morals that stated how an individual should act towards one another, causing not only the guards, but the prisoners to fall into internal decadence. Through the sickening experience, the power the “guards” had most definitely got into their heads. “The Stanford Prison Experiment degenerated very quickly and the evil and inhuman side of human nature became apparent very quickly.” Also proven in the experiment is that the environment played a huge factor with the result of the guards beginning to harass the prisoners and play a more savage…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What happens when good people are put in an evil place? What about when innocent individuals are systematically punished and humiliated? Is human identity rooted in one 's situation? A 1971 endeavor, now known as Zimbardo 's Prison Experiment, attempted to explore these questions and others.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1971, an experiment took place in Stanford, California. It was named the Stanford Prison Experiment, lasting what was meant to be two weeks, but due to the brutality of the trial, lasted a mere 6 days. Its purpose was to conduct a study on humanity and show just how evil a human can get when given a position of power. To summarize the experiment, a random 18 men were chosen, all innocent, good people who’d never committed a crime. They were divided into two groups erratically: 9 being “prisoners” and 9 being “guards.”…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A few good men Comparative Analysis Obedience to authority is something that is drilled into almost every child in almost every culture. We've been taught to always obey your elders, and always listen to the directions given. All throughout school you’ve been made to not question the system or what the teachers tell you. This contributes to later on in the life of military personnel, who are made into soldiers with blinding loyalty.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The experiment started off with the volunteers adopting their roles quickly and easily, with guards exercising control, and the prisoners being compliant. Soon, the prisoners began adopting realistic behavior where they would abandon their solidarity and seek to benefit from other inmates infringements. With the prisoners being dehumanized with pointless orders, insults, boring jobs, and physical punishment (push-ups), it was clear that the guards began to act tyrannical in their environment. On the mere second day, there was a rebellion. Prisoners ripped off their numbers and barricaded their doors to seek protection and distance to insult and mock the guards.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Zimbardo Prison Experiment

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Finally, the environment was crafted to be brutal. The guards and prisoners may have reacted differently in a less brutal environment. "BBC study in December, 2001, two psychologists, Stephen Reicher and Alexander Haslam, tried to find out. They worked with the documentaries unit of the BBC to partially recreate Zimbardo ’s setup over the course of an eight-day experiment….Soon, more prisoners began to challenge the guards.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Report on the Stanford Prison Experiment for PSYC 1111 The Office of Naval Research sponsored a study at Stanford University to "develop a better understanding of the basic psychological mechanisms underlying human aggression" and to identify which conditions can lead to aggression when men are living in close quarters for a long period of time (Haney, C., Banks, W.C. & Zimbardo, P.G. (1973)). This experiment took form within a model prison created in the basement at Stanford University to discover the variables found in prisons that can lead to aggression in people, i.e. guards and prisoners. The hypothesis explored was that ‘guards’ and ‘prisoners’ would react in different ways and their behavior and state of being would differ from each…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    They began tormenting the prisoners, subjecting them to humiliating tasks, as well as verbal and physical punishments. The abuse quickly became so severe that Zimbardo prematurely terminated the study after only six days. The Stanford Prison experiment exemplifies how, given unrestrained power and with the group dynamics of groupthink and group polarization at play, good men can be lead to commit evil actions very…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the past there have been experiments conducted that have done more harm and little to no good. There is a line that can be crossed between a toll being taken for the greater good versus people being exploited and put in harm’s way. There can be a larger benefit to society for the sacrifice that people have made. However, there are several experiments that cross that line and have little to no benefit to society or the greater good. People should not suffer for trivial findings, nor should people be treated in an unethical way for an experiment.…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment Does giving one person more power than another really change the way that they will react in a certain situation? Do certain circumstances cause a different reaction in different people? That was the question for the Stanford Prison Experiment performed by Phil Zimbardo in 1971. In an attempt to show what life was like to be in prison, the inmates and guards of Stanford County Jail, were placed in an almost inhumane setting. The tyranny of the men in charge, along with the abuse of the inmates, goes to show how people that are placed in an environment and told to play roles that they are not necessarily familiar with, can go wrong.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Incarceration In Prisons

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Crime happens to many people, many good people too. Throughout time, confinement has been becoming worse and worse, it’s a social problem that needs to be fixed. “Criminals” are sent to prison to be punished and to be prohibited from committing crimes again. Others that have gone to prison before may discourage others from breaking the law in order to avoid prison. Currently, almost two million people are in prisons and/or in jails and the majority of the people who are put in federal prisons were because of drugs.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    On August 14, 1971 Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment called the Stanford Prison Experiment took off. Young men were offered $15 a day to take part in a mock prison experiment in the basement of the Stanford University Psychology Department. The men were divided into either prison guards or prisoners, this experiment was only to last two weeks. Upon the prisoners arrival at the make shifted prison they were stripped off their clothes and sprayed with disinfecting spray. Each prisoner was issued a dress as a uniform with their prison identification number on the back and front.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted in 1971 by researcher, Philip Zimbardo is one of the most eye-opening social studies done to this day. It’s purpose was to find out more about how the social principles of obedience and conformity can affect the behavior of a normal human being. Zimbardo wanted to discover how social customs and hierarchy affect the roles people play, in a prison setting (Lurgio, 2015, p.1866). Though their purpose seems praiseworthy, the experiment itself was not. It was filled with ethical violations and in just 6 days, spun out of control (Lurgio, 2015, p.1866).…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If this experiment was done today Philip Zimbardo would be arrested for abuse because this experiment is very illegal. This experiment helped prove Philip Zimbardo’s theory could good people turn evil and the answer is yes. The power goes to your heads because in the 6 days that the guards were awful to the prisoners the next week they were all best friends again and no one mistreated anyone. When they were interviewed later they all said that they didn’t know what came over them but they had power and the…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Phillip Zimbardo (1972) gave us notable understandings into human behaviour, even though considered an unethical study. In the scandalous experiment, a group of participants completed a study in a mock prison environment. Some of the participants took on the role of prisoner, and others acted as the guards. The guards behaved in an inhumane and demeaning way towards the participants acting as prisoners. They were not given full details e.g. on what to expect and how to behave.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays