Speedy Trial Essay

Improved Essays
(b) The accused is entitled to right to speedy trial at all stages- investigation, inquiry, trial, revision, etc. Hence, there is no reason to restrict the scope of this right.
(c) An accused has certain concerns with respect to right to speedy trial namely period of remand and pre-conviction incarceration, impairment in the ability of the accused to defend himself due to undue delay causing disappearance or non-availability of the witnesses or otherwise.
(d) At the same time, an important fact which cannot be ignored is that it is usually the accused who is interested in delaying the proceedings as it is often said that delay is a known defense tactic. However, there may also be cases where the Prosecution might be interested in delaying

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    On the 17th of December 1986, Olaf Dietrich arrived in Melbourne from a flight from Thailand and was charged the next day with four counts of drug trafficking. He was alleged to have swallowed 70 grams of heroin in small packets in attempt to smuggle them through customs. Olaf Dietrich was found, in his first trial, guilty by a jury of importing no less than a trafficable amount of heroin as pursuant to section 233B of the Customs Act of 1901. Dietrich at first alleged that the drugs had been planted by the police. He was found guilty of two other counts and sentenced in the Victorian County Court.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Summary Of In Re Gault

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages

    During the adjudicatory process, there are usually two judicial hearings that the juvenile attends. The first is the initial appearance, is the equivalent of arraignment where the juvenile is notified of the charges against them, they are appointed legal counsel and bail is considered. If the case has not been settled by the close of the initial appearance, it is held for trial. In re Gault is the case that changed the nature of juvenile trials forever. In 1967, the United States Supreme Court ruled that defendants must be afforded the same rights as adults.…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the United States, the criminal justice system follows two unique diverse models that protect the people. One of these models is the Due Process Model and in this model, the rights of the defendant are equally and fairly treated. Which this process being the main objective of this clause. The second model is the Crime Control Model and in this model strict punishments to the defendant committing the crime be forced but also protecting the individual 's rights as well. Both these models have a different method in which they protect the individuals but have a similar focus.…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    GIDEON v. WAINWRIGHT CITATION: 372 U.S. 335 (1963) FACTS: In the state court of Florida, Gideon was accused of breaking and entering. Gideon is so poor that he has no money to hire a lawyer. So he asked the justice to appoint a lawyer for him.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Malice Liability Case

    • 4029 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Question 1: A: True. Malice aforethought is “a planned killing motivated by spite” (Woolman, Homicide). Additionally, there is express malice. Express malice is the “defendant’s subjective intent to kill”, or more specifically their feelings or opinions (ChartaCourse). Hatred or the emotional equivalent is a person’s feelings or opinions and goes directly to subjective intent to kill.…

    • 4029 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brandon Betterman, the petitioner in this case, pleads guilty to jumping bail after not appearing for his court date on charges of domestic assault. Between his conviction and his sentencing, Betterman waited fourteen months due to a delay within the institution (Betterman). He believes that fourteen months should be taken off of his sentencing. This began the ultimate constitutional debate concerning what he considered his right to a speedy trial. The ruling claimed by the Montana Supreme Court stated the Sixth Amendment’s Speedy Trial Clause does not apply to the post conviction and pre-sentencing delay (Betterman).…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “This is dealt with in the Bill of rights too where it says, In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury.” The court decision cannot be made of what they believe in and what the majority believes in. They must take evidence, witnesses, claims, facts, and point of views from everyone when they make their…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For four years, America engaged in the most deadliest and effecting war known to history- World War II. Throughout this time period, more lives had been lost on and off the battlefield than any other war. In the beginning, the United States had hoped to be like a ghost, unseen as a part of the war and it was not until tragic struck the people of America until Roosevelt chose to join in. On December 7, 1941 -the attack on Pearl Harbor forced America to partake in the war. After this attack, over 100,000 lives would be changed within just a few months.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Having been a topic of discussion and concern for so long, one may infer that keeping a sovereign entity from being able to continually prosecute someone until they get the results they want, is and was of great concern. I concede that there may be carriages of injustice for the victims, but to go the other way of allowing someone to be prosecuted until the “right” judge or jury is seated is of even bigger concern to me, for which I agree with the clause. However, if evidence becomes available to charge the defendant with a different crime for which he/she was not acquitted, every effort should be…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sixth Amendment Rights

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The right to counsel is something that a defendant should be allowed as our Sixth Amendment right states. Having this right, give the defendant their own choice as to who can represent them, when they are paying for it on their own accord. The Sixth Amendment rights state, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence. ”(Book).…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Additionally, the trial must happen within a reasonable amount of time. The accused has the right to have a bench trial or a grand jury trial. The trial must be Speedy and public with an impartial jury. There must be no self-incrimination. Keep in mind the accused is innocent…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Balancing the tension between community interest and individual rights and freedoms are a significant component of the criminal trial process and is relatively successful in that retrospect. In order to be effective and efficient the criminal trial process should reflect the moral and ethical standards of society, ensure the community is sufficiently protected and respects the rights of the individual. However, despite efforts to achieve justice for all members of society, the criminal trial process does fail to provide adequate success in some areas of the law such as the jury system, Legal Aid and the provocation defence. All these areas to an extent highlight the lack of success the criminal trial process serves in balancing community interests…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physical evidence could be lost or destroyed. If a trial is delayed over a year then it is considered a violation of the Sixth Amendment. The time of delay will come into question and proper reason must be provided (LAWS). The right to a public trial is guaranteed to ensure that defendants are protected from abuse of the justice system, and to keep the public informed about how the justice system works. That right is not always granted when it can be proven to affect the due process clause.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal Sentencing Essay

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The criminal justice system maintains different goals when attempting to correct deviant and illicit behavior. In accordance to the sentencing guidelines established by United States Sentencing Commission (2011), punitive sentences are to incorporate a purpose for the sentence. Criminal sentencing can be categorized into six areas with distinctive goals: general and specific deterrence, incapacitation, retributive, rehabilitative, and equity/restitution. The sentencing goals are not exclusive and at times overlap in achieving its purpose. Furthermore, one goal is not better than another, but rather one would be more applicable in certain situations than another.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The right to a speedy trial has three advantages according to the case United States v. Ewell. The three advantages that resulted from this court case include the prevention of excessive incarceration, minimize anxiety experience by the accused as a result of a public accusation, and prevent damage to the defendant’s case resulting from too much delay. The right to counsel applies after indictment, formal charging, and on through sentencing (Worrall,…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays