Social Process Theory Of Crime

For example, social process theory exposes how an individual interacts with society. Depending on how the individual interacts with the factors, it will decide whether they’ll take the criminal path or not. Despite the large population of people in the world, only few engage in crime. However, what keeps an individual from performing criminal acts is the social bonds they possess. These bonds are made through our parents, peers and education. Parents will teach their kids the right way to act in society. Individuals are influenced by their peer’s actions, for example, if the peer vandalises property, there will be no surprise if the individual does the same. Also, if an individual did not attend school, then their lack of knowledge about the world will lead them down the wrong path. Mr Ayad was a 29-year-old French man struggling to make a living in Australia. His disconnection with his family living in France …show more content…
Criminal behaviour and regular behaviour is not entirely different. The only difference is that there are certain considerations involved in illegal behaviour as it results with harsh consequences. This is choice theory and is applied when dealing with the sentencing of offenders. Everyone has a choice in life, just like criminals have a choice to commit a crime. It is dependent on whether the pros outweigh the cons. This was embraced in the 1600’s known as the enlightenment period. In 1764, Beccaria proposed that punishments should be swift, certain and severe. Regardless of what crime you committed, you were going to receive a punishment that would not fit the crime. It was only in 1960 where rational choice was reintroduced. In Mr Ayad’s situation, he was already “lonely and broke”. Mr Ayad’s actions, that took the lives of two innocent people outweighed the consequences as he was already suffering hardships in