Positivist School Of Thought Essay

707 Words 3 Pages
Understanding how to best discourage criminal activity from a sociological point of view has been important to the public since the 19th century. Engagement in criminal activity has lead to many problems which criminology can assist with. Moreover, truth of continuing social development accompanies the need for diverse schools of thought. With progress comes new and dangerous ideas for the destruction of bonds between individuals and community. The most accurate ideas about why misdemeanors happen, and what police, churches and families can do about the misdemeanors, are all around us—we can address these misdeeds through determined work. Accordingly, corruption should receive active contemplation from the criminologist’s perspective since dishonesty always has negative long term effects that are decidedly serious. Multiple approaches have emerged to identify and stop wrongdoing; However, these approaches eventually separated into two main schools, and became the two schools—Classical and Positivist—which we study today. The Classical School assumes that people are rational; the belief that people function rationally leads to a focus on the offense rather than the actor. There are fundamental assumptions, but the principals won’t interlink without the idea of …show more content…
Positivist thinkers are of the opinion that improving the behavior of the individual is possible only by recognizing the roots of the criminal conduct, and then separating those roots. Cesare Lombroso (1835–1909) is the father of criminology, and he thought of people who committed crimes as savages; criminals were people who had inclinations more in keeping with what searchers of the time thought about our ancestral qualities. Notwithstanding, research has advanced, and now social process theories tend to look more solid to modern students of the criminal justice

Related Documents

Related Topics