Social Equity Liberalism

Improved Essays
that markets free of restrictions and barriers are most productive. Peters writes that the most significant threat to individual freedom, from the neoliberal perspective, is the government. Also that it is the role of the government to facilitate an uninhibited place for the individual economic participation (pp. 64). The other dominant model that Peters identifies is Social Equity Liberalism (SEL). This model also accepts neoclassical economics as the primary and most efficient method method of stimulating social change. SEL assumes that it is the responsibility of the parts of the government to provide social supports for its most marginalized citizens. The “epistemological vantage point” of this viewpoint is also largely from the global …show more content…
The main goals that governments should provide support against the boom and bust of the market economy and those governments should invest in Public works to provide a “social safety net” (pp.77). Keynesianism criticizes the neoliberal economic measure of success, Gross National Product (GNP). The SEL model believes that GNP is not an accuate measure of a countries success because it leaves out social indicators. The SEL model instead uses the Human Development Index (HDI), which measures indicators of longevity, education, and income per head (pp. 79). This model largely sees development as improving the standard living of everyone based on the ideals of the global …show more content…
The Telos of the SEL model is progress. Peters writes that the idea of progress is rooted in the enlightenment belief that life can get better and should (pp. 92). This involves not just economic progress but also social, spiritual, and physical well being of all people, in particular the poor. Peters regards the idea of progress in the SEL model as synonymous to a transition to a “developed” world lifestyle. The SEL model defines human flourishing as equity in the distribution of wealth. This is achieved through regulation of the market in order to promote fairness and justice (pp. 74). This model acknowledges the need to improve structures of government and the conditions of globalization in order for this to work (pp.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Market democracy acts as an effective hybrid between the two schools of liberal thought. Libertarians, with their emphasis that economic liberty is the paramount liberty, are attracted to market democracy’s contention that economic liberties are at least just as important as any other liberty. High liberals, with their emphasis on social justice, are attracted to market democracy’s acknowledgment that social justice is relevant. With that being said, both ideological groups disagree with parts of a market democracy. High liberals may claim that any system with thick economic liberty has potential problems, such as market failure or exploitation of workers.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, free market will promote the economic efficiency and develop the productivities, and ignore the homogeneous social distribution. For instance, America’s uneven education system, which quality is connected with income levels, is an obvious inequality. This reflects both a public investment deficiency and an asymmetric information. Improving heterogeneous distributional outcomes will inevitably involve either government intervention or certain incentives. For example, setting up minimum wage, unemployment insurance and tax system to eliminate the unequal distribution.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This ideology leans towards a ‘positive’ view of freedom, believing that government intervention should only exists to assist vulnerable and weak individuals to thrive and achieve their goals. Social intervention exists to protect people from the atrocities of society that will interfere with their wellbeing, whereas, economic intervention seeks to correct the wrong doings of laissez-faire capitalistic period of the Enlightenment, which caused social and economic inequalities, such as unemployment ( Heywood,2004).Modern liberalism had reached its climax during the post war period , with the regeneration of industries and the introduction of welfare programs such as pension, family allowances, health care and advanced education fees. These programmes where economically successful, having saved the U.S. out of the Great Depression. Therefore, the goal of the government is to “help people to help themselves”…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1. On the U.S. Political System, a Liberal believes in government action to achieve equal opportunity and equality for all. Liberalism is a political ideology that believes that discriminatory practices must be eliminated and that the impact of great equalities of wealth needs to be lessened. Liberals favor governmental and social reform, controlled by the government.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism In World Politics

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Liberals believe that all nations can work together to a better humankind. That world will be a better place with trade and…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The objective existence of economic power cause reality that income is determined by power rather than marginal productivity assumed by neoclassical theory. Thereby it is necessary to reconsider the minimum wage policy rejected by the two school. Some redistributive role for government is supposed to be warranted (Stilwell, 2011). There are clear evidences to support the claim that in the absence of state interference, the private sectors are unlikely to concern wage bargaining (Twomey, 2012). Surprisingly, according to Plowman and Perryer (2010), Adam Smith viewed as the champion of anti-government free markets, may have endorsed the implement of minimum wage policy.…

    • 1861 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Therefore, he builds a view of society in a state of harmony and growth with individuals who move towards national and personal growth which is, according to Hobhouse, entrenched in human nature. In addition, Hobhouse summarises the chapter by claiming that ‘Heart of Liberalism’ is the acknowledgement that the “progress is not a matter of mechanical contrivance, but of the liberation of living spiritual energy”. By stating that Leonard Hobhouse again highlights the priority of human development and pushes this emphasis further than classical liberals (Freeden,…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism Vs Liberalism

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Liberalism does agree with realism about the sole importance of a sovereign state. “The structure of democratic government limits and constrains the types of conflicts over which democratic leaders can mobilize society” (Haupt 2016, T2L2, 10). Ikenberry describes that there are various strands of liberalism. One strand is that “free trade and economic openness both create and reinforce democracy, because open markets support more open and less autocratic regimes” (America’s Grand Liberal Strategy p. 48). Liberalism’s logic believes free trade will give rise to a state’s well-being, which will create more peace amongst the state.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most prominent distinctions between classical liberalism and New Deal liberalism is the level of government intervention that exists within a particular society. Ultimately both practices attempt to assist and promote the endeavors and economic prosperity of the individual, but one requires more government aid and assistance than the other. Classical liberalism advocates the idea that the government should remain hands-off during economic exchange, as it coercively hinders an individual's’ freedom of obtaining life, liberty, and property. In addition, the idea of free market is highly favored and accepted within classical liberalism. In contrast, New Deal liberalism believes that increased government spending and regulation is necessary…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Modern liberalism and modern conservatism are both incomplete without one another. Both groups carry a unique quality that can bring society together and completes the society. Modern conservatism leans more towards the economy as modern liberalism aids liberty. For instance, without modern liberalism we would not be able to understand that “the government must protect individuals from the inequities of modern society and correct the injustices and failures of “free-market” capitalism including environmental degradation.” Liberals believe that the government plays the role of protecting those rights and disaster from occurring. On the other hand, modern conservatives “emphasize individual property rights and limited government (classical liberalism).”…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics