Currently, liberalism which is an idea that supports the liberal economic activity rather than the economy controlled by government is a controversial social, economic, and political issue. And it is an issue that may have direct effect on the household economy. Therefore, whether you support or criticize liberalism, it is important to know what the opinion of the liberalist is. Deirdre N. McCloskey provides her argument which supports liberalism in an article “The Formula for a Richer World? Equality, Liberty, Justice.” At the beginning of an argument, an author shows a picture of the French Revolution with her claim of fact: “The French Revolution was one of the events that gave rise to liberalism, which in turn improved the welfare of the masses.” The author argues that the liberalism delivers the social welfare and wealth to the country and makes the country richer to readers of the New York Times who are interested in business, economy, history, and politics.
At the first paragraph of his article, she emphasizes her main claim of fact again. The world is becoming richer because of liberalism. She mentioned the evidence from the fact that some people are still living with less than $3, however, almost everybody …show more content…
Raising low productivity by enabling human creativity is what has mainly worked. By contrast, taking from the rich and giving to the poor helps only a little.” This line of reasoning expresses author’s thinking that liberalism is a better way to improve the world’s welfare in contrast to socialism. She is trying to deliver a message that liberalism is better than socialism economy to solve the economic inequality problem because it makes people creative to audiences of the article. As an allusion that support her claim, she picked China and India, where had astonishing economic improvements. In these country, real wages have continued to grow by raising
At the first paragraph of his article, she emphasizes her main claim of fact again. The world is becoming richer because of liberalism. She mentioned the evidence from the fact that some people are still living with less than $3, however, almost everybody …show more content…
Raising low productivity by enabling human creativity is what has mainly worked. By contrast, taking from the rich and giving to the poor helps only a little.” This line of reasoning expresses author’s thinking that liberalism is a better way to improve the world’s welfare in contrast to socialism. She is trying to deliver a message that liberalism is better than socialism economy to solve the economic inequality problem because it makes people creative to audiences of the article. As an allusion that support her claim, she picked China and India, where had astonishing economic improvements. In these country, real wages have continued to grow by raising