Simulating Murder Summary

Improved Essays
The action of taking someone’s life can be seen as atrocious and unthinkable although it occurs time and time again. The article Simulating Murder tries to describe what is it that triggers people to take a person’s life. Multiple hypothetical case scenarios where constructed in order to simulate the act of murder. The laboratory controlled study focuses on the reasoning that produces human being to want to physically harm another.
Society has undergone heavy turbulence multiple times with headlines of massive killings in which creates tension among people. The question is what incites such action especially when morals and values are enforced in today’s education. When you asked someone if they are willing to kill another person, they will
…show more content…
On this note the experimenters responded that people who do perform such actions of harm lack empathy towards the victim. Killers lack the moral compass that supposedly is integrated on everyone. Perhaps is their egotistical nature or their unwavering confused thoughts justified their actions as morally right. Is it ok to murder someone, even if that person potentially planning on creating an atrocious act. We can bring self-defense into play to justified killing someone but not for the better good of saving other people’s lives. The study might hypothetical but they are true concerns. People tend to not perform an action if they find themselves as morally responsible for doing it. They have the need to find a justification for their actions as to not to be in discord with their guilt. Humans want to be quilt free which requires them to pin the blame on other for their actions. Murder is a huge crime, which goes to show that it’s hard to justify such action even if done for the sake of another. Free will goes into play in all this, which explains the classic scenario where one is made to kill someone unless they want to be killed or someone else gets killed. When stripped of their free will, people find it morally ok to perform actions of harm when otherwise they wouldn’t. Morality is a big factor but also can become an instigator to produce this

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    We are saying it is OK, to kill someone if they have killed someone you love. We are showing that anger is the answer, when someone does you wrong. Also, by killing someone we are taking away their right to live, and to anyone who is religious this is fundamentally wrong. I understand that allowing the person to keep these legal rights, it could be a challenge , because it is not easy to do all these things in prison, but the person being alive in prison…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stephen reclaims that we as humans have respect for human dignity, we can punish people for their crimes but we can’t deprive them of everything, which the death penalty does. With the death penalty it’s basically saying to that convict that your life is basically worthless and has no human value. Nathanson believes we are not in any right position to affirm that to anyone. The main reason why this is such a big dispute is that people think a murderer has forfeited is rights as a human being, or morally free to kill him or her. To me though they do forfeit some of their rights but at the same time they are still a human being like the rest of us.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If someone had the capacity and will to murder someone else, then their will has been compromised and there is no going back. By murdering, one’s true toxic motives and desires are revealed. They were completely unable to use reasoning to either find the will to walk away and prevent themselves from committing this crime. The choice to murder someone is one of the most selfish decisions one could make. This is because there is no right reason to do it.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According Hume, they say, since morality is based on sentiment, if people feel pleased when they kill someone, killing should also be morally good, but it is absolutely not. It seems like a sound argument, but Hume may respond that this is not the case for following reasons. First, we should know more information besides the action of killing. For example, people who are killing because of self-defense should not be blamed even though they feel the sense of pleasure because their lives are saved. After we rule out this self-defense case, another response might be that those who kill other people deprive others from happiness, thus violating public utility.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The law would be broken because attacks to this scale would be illegal, but it is all in an effort to save harmless civilians being murdered by an irrational higher power. If the innocent people do not break the law and fight back, then more innocent people die and it creates a more unsafe environment. The law needs to be…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are several reasons why the death penalty is a good idea. One reason is that it is a warning. Death is scary because it is something no one knows about. Criminals know they will be put to death if they commit murder. They don’t want to die.…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a deterrent, capital punishment works good, except for those who feel a compulsion to kill, like Ted Bundy. People who have a compulsion to kill or commit other appalling acts, are not going to be deterred, but rather they will hide. There would be more atrocious crimes if it was not for the punishments that are sure to…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If somebody does not realize that going around murder people is incorrect, then I trust, that letting such people live is not only a great threat to the society, but also a great problem. Critic of the death penalty, Adam Belau, wrote, "Prevention by means of incapacitation occurs only if the executed…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is a very controversial issue where can be found with long standing application in countries such as the united states Hugo A. Bedau expresses his opinion that the death penalty is the form of human brutality and stupidity that goes against human dignity. Claiming that the death penalty is ineffective way to deter future offenses. Bedau also argues that the government uses death penalty in hopes of bringing fear to individuals and by displaying superior power that their fate lies in their hands. Deterrence is an act that influences people to not do something, creating fear and thus reducing crimes. Many of us are convinced when a particular punishment receives severe consequences that it will deter behavior from reacquiring.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If someone is to commit murder people will want to see the person be punished, and most will favor and push for the death penalty. Society tries to eliminate crime and seek justice by having capital punishment, but these factors lead to wrong decision making. Once people notice the gravity of a situation they become subjective and it can cause the authorities to wrongfully accuse an innocent person of a crime. For example, if multiple children are murdered, the parents and the communities will seek authorities to find the person responsible, which they should, but it can cause the authorities to hastily accuse one of being the “cold-blooded killer.” There was a case where this happened, “the legend of Cropsey became disturbingly real with the psychopath Rand, who used to be a physical therapist at Willowbrook. From his various secret lairs, he would maneuver and plan his kidnappings and murders, such as that of Jennifer Schweiger, Holly Hughes, and Tiahese Jackson” (Elshamy).…

    • 1069 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays