But when it comes to the attunement of an instrument on the other hand, it would be impossible to have attunement before the assembly of the instrument itself. Therefore Simmias’ argument is contradicted and upon hearing this Simmias agrees and takes back his objection to Socrates original argument. After reading this section about the attunement of the soul and Socrates response to his argument I believe that Socrates made the more coherent argument. Although Simmias had a good point when talking about the attunement of an instrument and how it would not be in existence after the object itself was destroyed, Socrates argument has more of a backing than Simmias. The most well grounded of his arguments relates back to the theory of recollection as stated in the paragraph above. Basically Simmias agrees with Socrates because the theory of recollection is in his
But when it comes to the attunement of an instrument on the other hand, it would be impossible to have attunement before the assembly of the instrument itself. Therefore Simmias’ argument is contradicted and upon hearing this Simmias agrees and takes back his objection to Socrates original argument. After reading this section about the attunement of the soul and Socrates response to his argument I believe that Socrates made the more coherent argument. Although Simmias had a good point when talking about the attunement of an instrument and how it would not be in existence after the object itself was destroyed, Socrates argument has more of a backing than Simmias. The most well grounded of his arguments relates back to the theory of recollection as stated in the paragraph above. Basically Simmias agrees with Socrates because the theory of recollection is in his