Similarities Between Socrates And Simmias

Improved Essays
After hearing what Simmias comes up with, the men in the room fall into a state of sadness because they feel as though Socrates hypothesis has been disproven. But like always their mentor, Socrates, has a rebuttal towards Simmias. He recalls his discussion with them about the theory of recollection and asks if they still agree with him about its credibility. Simmias as well as others in the room agree that the theory is well grounded and a credible hypothesis because it is based on the theory of forms. Upon hearing this Socrates states how Simmias is contradicting himself by agreeing with this theory and his idea of the attunement of an instrument. He goes into detail saying that the theory of recollection states that the soul must have existed …show more content…
But when it comes to the attunement of an instrument on the other hand, it would be impossible to have attunement before the assembly of the instrument itself. Therefore Simmias’ argument is contradicted and upon hearing this Simmias agrees and takes back his objection to Socrates original argument. After reading this section about the attunement of the soul and Socrates response to his argument I believe that Socrates made the more coherent argument. Although Simmias had a good point when talking about the attunement of an instrument and how it would not be in existence after the object itself was destroyed, Socrates argument has more of a backing than Simmias. The most well grounded of his arguments relates back to the theory of recollection as stated in the paragraph above. Basically Simmias agrees with Socrates because the theory of recollection is in his

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Rep. IV at 436b-c, Socrates puts forth the the principle of division. This principle provides a means to rationally and plausibly divide the soul into parts. Socrates states that the “same thing will not be willing to do or undergo opposites in the same part of itself, in relation to the same thing, at the same time” (436b). What this means is that a single body can not have opposite processes that occur simultaneously. For example, Socrates provides the example of someone who is standing still while their hands and head move (436c).…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both King and Socrates were outspoken men who stood by their beliefs despite others thoughts. While Socrates follows a strict guideline that under no circumstance is breaking laws okay; King has a slightly altered position stating, “One has not only legal but a moral responsibility to follow just laws,” he goes on, “One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.” When discussing the debate of just and unjust laws, King follows God’s standards, the “Natural Law. ”It would be erroneous to strictly base your standards on actual laws when laws are constantly changing. Furthermore, if laws are constantly changing, a person’s standards may change.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates in Apology In the Apology, Socrates presents an argument for his belief in the Greek gods to invalidate Meletus’ assertion that Socrates is an atheist, which therefore means his teachings corrupt the youth (26b). Socrates’ argument is valid through philosophical logic yet as we will find, his argument is not sound. There are also revisions to Meletus’ claims which will be presented as it will display a stronger argument in favor of Socrates’ atheism.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Phaedo, Simmias believes that the soul is similar to the harmony made from an instrument. Socrates points out two statements that make Simmias rethink his views on the soul and the body. As Socrates turns down Simmias 's theory of the soul, not only is he able to convince Simmias, he is also able to make great arguments that support his ideas on how the soul cannot be relatable to the attunement of an instrument. Simmias 's opinion on the soul is that the harmony that is produced by an instrument is similar to the relationship between the body and the soul. Simmias mentions that the soul exists before it enters into the body of a person however the soul is composed of elements that do not exist yet.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates’ Success in Answering Meno’s Paradox Introduction In the dialogue Meno, Socrates and Meno start by attempting to find what virtue is, but are unsuccessful. They then dig into a more generalized question of how to find what any thing or idea is when one does not know what it is they are looking for. This is Meno 's Paradox. Socrates attempts to solve this paradox through the theory of recollection which states that the human soul is immortal and has knowledge of everything.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    During the Golden Age of Pericles ' Athens, Plato, an intellectual individual, set out to understand the relations that occurred between the body and the soul. With immense studying of his former teacher, Socrates, Plato came to his realization that the body and the soul were in fact separate from one another. Not only are the two separate, but he discovered that the soul itself is immaterial and immortal and wishes nothing more then to (insert freeing the body quote). Plato’s understanding of the body would not have been possible without Socrates’ theories of opposites, recollection, and scattering of objects.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The “cyclical argument” of the Phaedo imparts the ideology Socrates had in regard to the immortality of the soul and his views about death, which he was about to face himself. Among a gathering of his most faithful followers, his friends are astonished that Socrates is not desolate about his ill fate, but rather, he is delighted with it. Socrates proclaims that the life of a philosopher is merely a preparation for death since the mind is most pure when the pressures of the body is felt least. He even informs them that he believes in the soul and the afterlife. After his friends vocalized their skepticism of his beliefs, he begins a discourse in which he attempts to prove the immortality of the soul.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It describes the final conversations between Socrates and his close friends before he is put to death. The entire dialogue focuses on the matter of death and what happens to our souls after we die. Socrates presents four arguments to prove the immortality of the soul, one of which is the “Argument from Opposites,” in which he conveys that all things come to be in existence from their opposites. This is Socrates’ first argument that he presents, and although it is supported with great detail, it lacks the support that is necessary to prove that the soul is immortal. Socrates uses an extensive amount of contradictory opposites to support his claim such as sleeping and waking up, and faster and slower, however these do not properly compare to being alive and being dead because they are contrary opposites.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Argument for the Immortality of the Soul When Socrates and Meno are halted in their argument by a paradox, Socrates proposes a new idea that will solve the paradox and continue their conversation. He states that the soul is immortal and it has learned everything in past lives. Thus, what men call learning is actually a process of recollection. I will first be giving context as to how this idea came into the dialogue with Meno. Next, I will explain how he puts the same idea forward in Phaedo and then noting the differences between the two dialogues.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Soul Analysis

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This section of “Plato’s Republic” demonstrates key ideas of the soul from Socrates view point. From the start of this section Socrates introduces his ideas to Glaucon. Socrates believed that cities have three attributes. He goes on to explain that since the attributes of a city come from the people living within, the soul must also be split into three attributes. Socrates attempts to break down the soul into three different categories; the part of the soul that learns or thinks (rational), the part of the soul that desires pleasure, and the part of the soul that is spirit.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people agree our culture has been shaped by philosophy in one form or another throughout history, however, may people tend to reflect on specific philosophers. Eastern culture tends to reflect on eastern philosophy, dating back to Confucius and the Buddha, and western culture with western philosophy, dating back to Aristotle, Socrates, and Plato. Is there a reason for this? Is it fair to say that our different cultures have more or less accepted the philosophical principles of our own native philosophers? With education, almost everyone has heard of or been taught historic philosophies of the eastern and western cultures, and can apply it to their lives willingly, but I believe there are a few more differences between the two that instigates…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s Gorgias, Socrates and Callicles engage in a debate about what it means to be happy and to live a flourishing life. According to Callicles, a person is happy and flourishing when he or she is living as ambitiously as he or she possibly can. Living the good life includes chasing one satisfaction after another and having a constant influx of pleasure. In contrast, Socrates emphasizes on the idea of eudaimonia, according to which a happy and flourishing person is one that lives an orderly life, in which the person maintains discipline and control over oneself.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates begins by dividing up his city into three distinct classes of society. He states that in ideal city consists of producers, auxiliaries, and guardians. The producing class consists of farmers, craftsmen, artisans, and anyone else preforming a trade. The auxiliaries are the warriors of the city, which help keep the city in order. Last, the guardians are the rulers of the city.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Phaedo, Plato provides several arguments in an attempt to prove the immorality of the soul. In this essay, I will focus on his Final Argument, which describes the Forms as causes, subject to destruction or displacement when the particular undergoes some change. Next, I will show how Socrates applies these ideas to argue for the immortality of the soul. Finally, I will present a few reservations I have about the validity of this argument.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments Against Socrates

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates argument In the apology book Socrates have many accusers. Now he is accused of corrupting the youth but He is denying the allegations he is saying that he could not intentionally corrupt anyone. Some people are convinced that he is speaking the truth but some people thing that he is lying.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays