Similarities Between 20th Century Russia And Germany

Superior Essays
Comparing 20th Century Russia and Germany. The 20th century was a time of tremendous change, upheaval, and revolution. The existence of modern day Russia and Germany are a testament to that, and the development of communism and fascism in those countries respectively are what shaped them the most. In Russia, communism took hold during the 1920’s, and faced incredible opposition both internally, from royalists, and externally, from the hostile international community. Germany embraced fascism a bit later in the century, during the 1930’s. However, fascism in Germany faced none of the hurdles that communism in Russia did, as the Nazi party was democratically brought to power rather than through revolution. These forms of government seem polarizing …show more content…
This was certainly the case in Russia where an unprecedented cult of personality was fostered around Joseph Stalin- Vladimir Lenin’s successor. Stalin was presented as a paternal figure, guarding Russia and her people from the hostile world and its corrupting capitalism. He was truly idolized and close to divine. Consider the following quotation, “ Everything is Stalin, Stalin, Stalin. You only have to listen to a radio program about our achievements, and every fifth or tenth word will be the name of comrade Stalin.” (Strayer, 1075) Soviet Russia, like Nazi Germany, did not allow free press, critical opinions of the government were simply not published-this constant stream of propaganda resulted in Stalin becoming something of a national deity, “The portraits of party leaders are now displayed the same way icons used to be…” (Strayer, 1075) The reverence that the Russians held for Stalin was more than comparable to the adulation of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi party in Germany. Hitler-though he too was seen as a paternal and nearly divine savior of the nation - preferred to focus the brunt of the public idolization on the Nazi party rather than himself. He accomplished this in some of the same ways as the Russians- through massive rallies, political propaganda, and also through uniquely German state sponsored …show more content…
Once in power the Russian communists immediately set in motion massive land reform and redistribution, and shortly thereafter initiated forced collectivization; which was a very bloody process as the peasants were unwilling to relinquish their new land and slaughtered their livestock in droves rather than surrender them to the communal farms. This, along with other factors such as underperforming farms, resulted in famine. Another thing that the communist regime focused on from the very beginning was industrialization and modernization, which they defined as fundamental tasks- necessary to provide both the economic basis for communism and the army. This industrialization led not only to immeasurable economic growth, but also to many social outcomes such as improved standards of living, increased literacy, and the growth of a privileged elite. The first two outcomes are very positive; the third however, is rather problematic as when one lives in a communist society there should not be any form of elitism. The government did nothing to combat the development of this elite, straying once again from their Marxist roots. Stalin himself endorsed patriotism, traditional family values, individual competition, and wage inequality-all of which are very non-communist values, in fact, they are rather fascist. But by far the most

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    3. Europe was devastated by World War II and the situation was worsened when it was divided between the East and the West. The East being Russian and its puppet satellite states. The West being the US and other democratic nations. When Stalin returned to Russia the country was in a terrible state.…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The well being of the Soviet people was dramatically increasing. By turning Russia into a superstate he helped insure it to be a safer country and when people are happier in a country then the country will be better off. Stalin was an awful person. Stalin's son was so unhappy with him he shot himself but he survived so Stalin teased him for not even being able to shoot.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through the years leaders have come and gone, but gods are forever. Etched in the stones of history, Stalin will be forever remembered as the man who went against the popular opinion to survive. Humanity is based off survival of the fittest, and Stalin did what it took to survive. Without Joseph Stalin, the Nazis could have very well taken Russia.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Talking about the mindset of the people, Drakulic has a lot to say. It was a life style, and mentality that, for generations, people grew up with no hope of change. “...Communism instilled in us was precisely this immobility, this absence of a future, the absence of a dream... we learned to think: this will go on forever... we can’t change it... we were brought up with the idea that it is impossible to modify the system...”…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stalin was able to do this without much questioning due to his popularity amongst the citizens. He did this by using an ample amount of propaganda to promote self image. One way he did this was by photoshopping a picture of Lenin and himself shaking hands as if they were friends. Lenin, russia's former leader, was worshipped as a god and encompassed loving citizens which transpired to Stalin after the people witnessed them together as if companions. In which he named himself Stalin, or man of steel, he also named towns and cities after…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These posters were placed everywhere, and so Stalin was able to build up his image because anywhere the civilians were, there would most likely be a poster of Stalin. Additionally under a totalitarian state, people were brainwashed that they were part of the country as a whole instead of being an individual, and that everyone is working together for the greater good of the nation. Ideas from the enlightenment, such as reason, freedom, human dignity, and the worth of the individual was completely lost. (Dove, 10/3/16) Since Stalin was able to control media, the citizens were only able to see the positive parts about their ruler and not the negative changes that are impacting their country. The less they knew, the more control Stalin had over them and could continue…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The economy in China and Russia nearly collapsed under communism and with starvation running rampant in Russia Lenin recognized the need for some capitalistic practices. Russia 's later leader Joseph Stalin was dedicated to undermine everything the…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Richard Overy writes about two of the most influential world leaders in the 20th century in The Dictators: Hitler's Germany, Stalin's Russia. Although seemingly contrasting regimes, Overy gives a detailed look into the characteristics of both Hitler’s Germany and Stalin’s Russia, suggesting the two were seemingly similar in their styles. This paper will look at these distinct ideologies held by the two regimes, the similarities between the two regimes, how Overy accounts for these similarities, and the importance of studying these similarities and differences. Ideologically, Hitler’s Germany was Fascist, while Stalin’s was Communist. Although completely ideologically different from each other, Hitler’s Germany and Stalin’s Soviet Union…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Defining Nazi-Soviet Relations by Political Philosophy Communism and Fascism, at one glance, seems to be similar in the philosophy of collectivism and anti-democracy. However, the two philosophies cannot coexist due to the striking differences in loyalty and social roles. Both philosophies agreed on two major ideas that people should blend into their communities and that capitalism was unfair and harmful. However, Communism believes that the people are loyal to their social class, so they are loyal to people internationally in the same class (Stalin). However, Fascism strongly denies loyalty across nations, since it strongly urges for national pride and loyalty (Franco; “25 Points”).…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    War Communism Significance

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The significance of War Communism implemented by the Bolshevik Party from 1918-1921 can be measured in a number of different ways such as how it represented an important turning point for the Soviet Union, how it affected many Russian people and their lives, how it led to other important events, the impact it had on industry and the economy and how it had long-term political consequences. Although War Communism was significant for all those reasons mentioned above it was most significant because of the events that followed it, namely the Kronstadt Rebellion and the introduction of the New Economic Policy (NEP). These are the most significant because it showed Lenin that War Communism was not leading the Soviet Union towards socialism but instead…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mexican Revolution and the Russian Revolution were two very significant events in the history of their two respective societies of Mexico and Russia during the early twentieth century. There are certain ideals that can be used to compare and contrast both of the revolutions. Both of the revolutions were to gain rights and better conditions for the lower class/poor. They both attempted to gain these better rights by replacing the government that was in place with a different one. Both of the revolutions attempted to change their original government into a democratic government.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union could not have been more different, though they relied on many of the same mechanisms to maintain their totalitarian control of power. Nazi Germany was a fascist dictator ship, with all decisions coming from the top down. The Soviet Union was a one-party socialist state, and although its eras in history are marked by the president, power rested mostly in the hands of the party. Aside from the differences in political structures between Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia, each state had very different goals in mind upon its construction. Nazi Germany existed under the direct orders of Adolf Hitler, and every aspect of the state was based on his ideas and work.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Which to the Russians of the time thought could lead to a prosperous future for them. However, this wasn’t completely fair for everyone because of the heavy majority of Bolsheviks in Russia’s government after Vladimir Lenin and his band of merry communists rose to power. While this event isn’t that surprising/ alarming as this still happens today (like when a certain political party member is elected president, they tend to select a majority of their cabinet members that are of their political party). Fast forward 60 years(ish), and Joseph Stalin came to power. Under the “leadership” of Stalin, the USSR/Soviet Union started to fall apart.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Tactics Of Joseph Stalin

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Anyone who did not comply to these new ideals were turned in to the NKVD which was the secret police order. They were then arrested and never heard from again. Presumably they were killed or imprisoned for life. (3) Like Hitler, Stalin had his own praise system. Newspapers would applaud him, poets and songwriters would thank and praise him for a bountiful harvest, and pictures of him were everywhere to teach children to love him and follow him no matter what because he was a great and kind man.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In postwar Europe the opportunity to seize the nations of Eastern Central Europe was presented. Not necessarily by any fault of their own but because the great powers of Europe were not concerned with the sovereignty of the small nations of East Central Europe and allowed for their disregard. During this time of indifference the Soviet Union came in and asserted their power over the smaller nations in an attempt to Sovietize them. It is of vital importance that the reasons why, how, and to what extent East Central Europe was Sovietized are explored as a means to understand the history of East Central Europe.…

    • 1794 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays