Sigmund Freud Case Management Theory

2264 Words 10 Pages
By the 20th century, people began to recognize the fact that mental challenges were illnesses that required help. Previously, any predisposition of mental disturbance was considered as a kind of demonic possession. However, around this time, biotechnology was advancing at a rapid rate and therefore it was easier to comprehend the functionality of the human brain. Around the same time, Sigmund Freud popularity was rapidly growing as he developed his psychoanalysis theory. Freud’s analysis became vital to the future progress of social care formulation because they proved that most actions had a cause. (Intagliata, 1982) They also offered various sublimations that could be used to ensure that the patients minimized the effects of these thoughts. …show more content…
It is, therefore, a system that determines the exact type of assistance required by the individual seeking social services. In the case of management, it is agreed that is it is more helpful to the patient if this kind of help is administered relationally. (Mathew, 2016) This means that this treatment will be conducted with the consideration of people related to the individual. For this reason, the burden is reduced from the individual. Casework is a term that is use to referee to social work that is concentrated on the particular person. There are numerous differences that cannot be overlooked when comparing these initial differences in the definitions of casework and case management. These differences change the efficacy of the method when used for treatment. The casework methodology is tied to the individual and his challenges. (Gardiner, 2016) It is, therefore, looking to solve the current problem which may be financial and substance abuse. While this method is easy, to implement, it exposes the individual being helped to a very significant chance of relapsing into the detrimental habits as there is no one to help in his social setting. On the other hand, since case management is relation oriented, it means that all the members of the family are involved. This is essential in offering support after the social work service is …show more content…
The first main point is the fact that man is social in nature. For this reason, they cannot be studied in isolation. Secondly, there is the fact that these individuals are actively learning through what they see reinforced in the society. (van Breda, 2015) This means that society traditional and culture is vital to the development of an individual. Both theories also emphasize the need to strengthen positive behavior. This is because this will be the de facto good for the society. The social behavior and what is reflected in a child’s development act as an action and reaction force. Both of the theories would seem to reduce the responsibility of man for his actions considerably. In this case, most social workers are trained to help patients look at the things that are causing a particular reaction. (Williams, 2016) This can lead to some form of extraneousness to oneself. If the method encourages individuals to exonerate themselves of any wrongdoing, this could hamper the efficacy of the progress because it means that the individual sees no reason to change. The only different thing in the two theories is the fact that the social learning insists on the reinforcement of the good behavior for it to stick but the systems theory presumes that any tendency that is prevalent in the social setting will influence

Related Documents

Related Topics