Should Torture In The War On Terror Should It Be Forbidden?

Improved Essays
The use of torture in the war on terror should be strictly forbidden because it explicitly breaks international laws, violates the basics of human dignity, and lacks substance in a consequentialist argument. Each nation is obligated to provide and protect the right to security and life for all its citizens. Any state must ensure protection of its citizens from torture because not only is its use unequivocally forbidden by several international laws, but also because it is a universal human right. Also, torture cannot be justified through a moral or consequentialist argument by any means. To keep their legitimacy, states must follow the standards of human rights when protecting their citizens from terrorist attacks or

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Introducing the author Daniel J. Hill, he made good points on views of torture on how it could be permissible and not permissible. He introduced different scenarios on how to look at torture and was very interesting. One view he gave was a “defense case” that expressed that the officer spots a terrorist who plans to detonate a bomb that could risk lives of many. The officer made the choice to tase the terrorist just enough to paralyze him from making the bomb go off. Another case was the “interrogation case” that speaks about a terrorist planting a bomb somewhere and security services using electric shocks to get the terrorist to speak on the whereabouts of the bomb.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cathy Young, in the article How Much Torture is OK, makes a very valid point when talking about torture. She believes if some torture is considered to be OK all torture will be considered OK. To be more specific, if they make exceptions for some circumstances, then it’ll be hard to justify between what is right and wrong. She also mentioned that the ticking time bomb situation was highly improbable. Young is a pragmatist, she understands that there is no right answer to the situation but in this case she wants to preserve America's core…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If we use torture tactics we could prevent more major terrorist attacks. Torture is the easiest way to get information out of terrorist. The CIA would only use torture methods on Al Qaeda leaders in order to get information that may prevent future attacks. Personally I believe that these torture methods are justified because of what they do to POW’s overseas. 59% of the American society support the CIA’s methods according to new polls conducted by telephone calls.(Adam Goldman reports on terrorism and national security for The Washington Post.)…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The best Way to Deal with Terrorists Is it really necessary to torture or make people suffer just to get stuff that we need from them? After reading “The Case for Torture” by Dr. Michael Levin, I disagree with torturing terrorists to gain information. I am totally against with torture or punish terrorists because first, most terrorists are forced to act in the way they do, they have no power over their actions. Secondly, it is possible to transform the bad feelings inside them to a good one, I believe everyone deserves a second chance.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The world soon joined the United Sates, and the end of World War II saw the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and in the 1980’s the United Nations adopted a detailed treaty on torture in peacetime. This left for a long standing terms of absolutely no torturing of any individual. However all of the decades of laws, and all of the championing of the United States against torture came crashing down in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. Following the September 11 terrorist attacks within the year the United States executive branch was using torture to gain information. This was against every single law because the United States and never officially declared war.…

    • 1855 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Bowden Torture

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is a thin line between torture, coercion, and persuasion. For some countries, torture is an adequate form of punishment used to not only instill fear, but to also show the consequences of prohibited actions to others. However, for the United States and other countries who have signed the Geneva Convention, torture is strictly prohibited, but is still practiced in different forms. The article “The Dark Art of Interrogation,” written by Mark Bowden, explores various interrogation techniques used throughout the War on Terror by the United States Military, the Israeli government, and the New York City Police force. Each of the agencies consistently agreed that using “hard torture” was “the classic shortcut for a lazy or incompetent investigator”(…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture Debate Analysis

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Torture is now easier to justify in the context of the war on terror. Many opinions may arise when looking at whether or not we should torture potential terrorists and since there is not an actual strategy to proceed along when looking at it, the question still remains unanswered. The debate began after the incident in 9/11 had occurred and the government implemented several anti terrorism measures where justification was placed under the veil of Unitarianism. In the article “The torture debate” by Phillip Rumney and Martin O’Boyle they provide readers with complementary views on whether or not legalized systems of torture would be worth having. The authors also emphasize the issues that could result from having a torture of system since it could come with many implications.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I defend the nature of the balance of civil liberties, rights and torture by drawing upon Jeremy Waldron, Henry Shue and Jeff McMahan’s view on the morality of torture. Torture is the act of deliberately inflicting severe physical or psychological pain to an individual who is restrained and defenseless. Reasons for torture can include punishment, revenge, political re-education, deterrence, interrogation or coercion of the victim or a third party, or simply the sadistic gratification of those carrying out or observing the torture. In this paper I will argue that torture is not morally justified; torture ought not to be legalized or otherwise institutionalized even in the ticking time bomb scenario because the rights of the innocent…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The debate over whether or not torture should be used in American counterterrorism efforts strikes a seemingly balanced debate over the ethics of its use against terrorists. While torture is openly condemned in its everyday use against criminals, the argument of the “ticking time bomb” (TTB) scenario sparks interests about whether or not torture can be justified in such a case. While the circumstances may differ, the answer does not. The United States government should not use torture in any counterterrorism efforts as torture is never ethically permissible under any circumstance. In making this argument, the flaws of the TTB scenario must be assessed, in addition to reviewing the debate through the ethical lens of the Rights approach, the…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture Vs Torture

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Unfortunately, however, different forms of inhuman and degrading treatment and punishment as well as torture are practised in all parts of the world, including highly industrialised and developed countries. Despite the fact that society is evolving, the effect of torture remains the same: such violations of human rights result in serious harm to the human being, to his physical and mental immunity, and requires a lot of effort to make it stop. Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) says: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment” . For many years international legal institutions have been developing, improving and consolidating different ways of resolving the problem. At…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea of torture can scare many people. In today’s world torture is now viewed as a thing of the past; a solution to our ancestor’s problems. Yet in reality, the dilemma whether torture should be used or not is still an issue. Many people would automatically say torture should not be allowed, until they are told millions of lives depend on it. Michael Levin is the person that made many readers second guess their answer to that simple, yet difficult question.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morally impermissible is facet where torture perception is not taken into account by intelligence while virtuously accepted is when it allowed based on the terrorism. The use of torture attempted to obtain data to foreclose an impending terrorist assail has been the center of much academic work. Much of the far-reaching commentary on this subject has adverted to the essential doctrine as justification for agonizing a suspect who probably has information pertaining a “ticking bomb,” but there has been little intricacy on just how the essential philosophy would work in this context. The term "torture" entails any act by which grievous pain or distress, whether physical or mental, is by choice imposed on an individual for such aims as getting from him or a third person data or a confession. Based on the intelligence activity, torture of terrorists is morally bitter since there is a demand of ceasing U.S.-sponsored torture, outsourcing of torture, close secret prisons, and close down Guantanamo and alike prisons and hold culprits and architects of torture…

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is Torture Necessary

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Most people don’t see torture methods being carried out unless watching terrorists or criminals being punished on television. These characters are seen being tortured because people feel as though they are getting justice if they cause harm to them while receiving information. Many people around the world, such as the CIA and other Intelligence Agencies feel that torture methods are sometimes necessary, however; that is not always the case. People across the country think that torturing someone is never necessary no matter the circumstances. When interrogating someone, torture methods should never be considered because it violates certain human rights, it is often times ineffective, and the interrogator may be considered as a cruel person.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the attacks carried out against the United States on 9/11, there has been a renewal in efforts against terrorism, giving rise to the current existence of the “War on Terror”. However the resulting policies, especially those adopted by the US, have been questioned in terms of their implications for human rights. In order to understand how the policies of the War on Terror have impacted human rights, I will first offer a definition as to what human rights are as well as they key practices adopted by the United States in their counter-terrorism efforts. The second half of this essay will then examine the impacts these policies have had both domestically and within foreign policy. In doing so, this essay will be able to conclude that whilst…

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human rights refer to the rights which every single individual is merited to by the virtue of being human (United Nations, 2016). It is regarded as a keystone which universally empowers people to live with dignity, freedom and equality (The Advocates For Human Rights, n.d.). These rights are inherent to and inalienable from all human beings (United Nations, 2016). Unfortunately, there have been countless instances when human rights have been infringed and gone unnoticed (). The infringement of human rights, however, have only received widespread acknowledgement during the turn of the century.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays