Essay On Utilization Of Torture

Superior Essays
Torture is defined as the intentional infliction of severe physical or mental pain or suffering for purposes such as obtaining information, a confession, punishing, or intimidating someone. However, there are several other modern methods to get one to admit, and torture should not be deemed as one. Torture can result in not only physical affliction, but also emotional and psychological. Every human beings rights should always be respected and guaranteed regardless of the situation. Torture is illegal all around the world, so if the government breaks the law, how should the people feel safe? The utilization of torture should not, under any circumstances, be justified. Torture as a concept is unethical, it dehumanizes people, and has a lot of consequences.
Torture should never be used as a substantial answer to any given situation. Observing it from an ethical perspective, torture treats the victim as a thing rather than a human being with value and purpose. It has shown in the past that once a country is accused of using torture, all credibility is lost and they are understandably looked down on. It is an extreme violation of human rights and should never be condoned. Torture will continue to stir in the victims of a cruel deity that will be kept in his or her’s conscious and will eternally cause agony and suffering. Some societies use
…show more content…
Whether its for the benefit of innocent people or sadistic satisfaction, it should never be justified. It alters a person's life to the worse. Every human should feel safe. If they are withholding information then it's their choice and they have a right of choice. Governments should not violate those human rights because they are the ones who should protect the people. Saving the innocent people shouldn't be a valuable excuse to torture someone. Torture is unethical, inhumane, an insufficient way to gather information, and society should never allow

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Cathy Young, in the article How Much Torture is OK, makes a very valid point when talking about torture. She believes if some torture is considered to be OK all torture will be considered OK. To be more specific, if they make exceptions for some circumstances, then it’ll be hard to justify between what is right and wrong. She also mentioned that the ticking time bomb situation was highly improbable. Young is a pragmatist, she understands that there is no right answer to the situation but in this case she wants to preserve America's core…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture Vs Torture

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Unfortunately, however, different forms of inhuman and degrading treatment and punishment as well as torture are practised in all parts of the world, including highly industrialised and developed countries. Despite the fact that society is evolving, the effect of torture remains the same: such violations of human rights result in serious harm to the human being, to his physical and mental immunity, and requires a lot of effort to make it stop. Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) says: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment” . For many years international legal institutions have been developing, improving and consolidating different ways of resolving the problem. At…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Wrong To Torture

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Interrogating one man can help reveal additional information to help foil any other possible plans the terrorist may have up his sleeves. In addition the utilitarian principle still applies in this situation. In fact, it is even more justifiable, because the torturer only places one person in pain. Not only do you get to save more lives, but torturing someone only causes them temporary physical pain. Killing thousands is permanent damage.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture Debate Analysis

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After reading this article, I believe that the author had provided enough evidence on whether or not torture would be beneficial or if it would lead to a slippery slope tragedy that would go against what they were trying to accomplish. In essence, I believe that having a torture system would only have a negative outcome and Liberal democracies should refrain from using such systems since preventing massive global issues could be more important than killing potential terrorists to protect innocent residents. Throughout the text presented the main idea…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I defend the nature of the balance of civil liberties, rights and torture by drawing upon Jeremy Waldron, Henry Shue and Jeff McMahan’s view on the morality of torture. Torture is the act of deliberately inflicting severe physical or psychological pain to an individual who is restrained and defenseless. Reasons for torture can include punishment, revenge, political re-education, deterrence, interrogation or coercion of the victim or a third party, or simply the sadistic gratification of those carrying out or observing the torture. In this paper I will argue that torture is not morally justified; torture ought not to be legalized or otherwise institutionalized even in the ticking time bomb scenario because the rights of the innocent…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How do you determine if and when the use of torture would be ethical? Let’s begin by examining the views of two well-known philosophers John Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant. Each of these philosophers had strong opinions and stances on the moral and ethical use of torture. John Stuart Mills’ theory on the ethical of the use of torture is that it is acceptable if it brings happiness and/or pleasure to the majority of people than if the torture were not carried out. One example he gives to support that theory is, if a terrorist has information that will prevent an act of terror that would result in the death of hundreds of innocent people and by obtaining this information thru an act of torture, it would likely save those lives he would agree…

    • 1009 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture as an Anti-Terrorist Strategy In 2005, the Detainee Treatment act was passed, which banned the military from engaging in torture as well as requiring the International Committee of the Red Cross to have access to prisoners being held by the U.S. government. In June of 2015, Senate voted to expand this law to prevent the military and all other government agencies from using torture during interrogations of prisoners, codifying a ban President Barack Obama issued by executive order shortly after he was sworn in. The use of torture has been a hot topic for the past several years, mainly because of its use by the Bush administration and the intelligence gained through torture eventually leading us to finding Osama Bin Laden. Many try…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Holocaust was a time when people such as Jews, Roma, Slavs, homosexuals, and people with disabilities were targeted for genocide by Nazi Germany. The Germans treated these people like they were animals. During this time, there were a lot of cruel and inhuman things that the Germans did to the specific groups of people targeted. The Germans accused them for for many things such as their failing economy. Articles Five, Twelve, and Eighteen of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights are just three of the arcticles violated during the Holocaust.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Torture Is Wrong

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Torture is generally ineffective, effects those subjected to it for the remainder of their lives, and is unacceptable no matter the reason. Consider the United Nations, what it is and what it stands for. The United Nations wrote and signed something known as the Geneva Conventions. The Geneva Conventions explicitly state in article 3 that, “humane treatment is required for all people in enemy hands. The use of murder, mutilation, torture, and the use of humiliating or degrading treatment is prohibited.”…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Torture Necessary

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Using the consequentialism approach, I am for torture because performing this action to possibly save lives is better than doing nothing and suffer through worse consequences. Another reason why torture is necessary is to make an example out of the terrorist to prevent future terrorist attacks. According to Timmons, torture is defined as any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for purposes.” An example the book used, if there was a ticking bomb terrorist scenario, then there should be a protocol that is non-fatal to gain information from the terrorist. Objectors may argue that there is no need for torture because the ticking bomb terrorist situation is rare.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many societies use torture as way of extracting information from people who will not easily give up much needed information. Torture is a topic of controversy in our world and has been for years now. Although torture may work in some instances, studies repeatedly show over and over that it is not effective. Oftentimes, people will say anything and even provide incorrect information to stop the suffering. I have analyzed opinion articles such as Torture is Morally Reprehensible by Kim Petersen and Torture is Never Justified by Nikki Burgess.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The idea of humanism in Europe began to denounce the English Bill of Rights in 1689, and with it condemned “cruel and unusual punishment” (Luban, 2010). Regardless, extreme methods of torture, such as boiling, castration, drowning, oxygen deprivation, tickle torture, tooth extraction, electric shock, and whippings, were used until the…

    • 2055 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Those who have been tortured are most certain to agree with keeping the ban. The victims of torture will never forget their experience and will continue to suffer for the rest of their lives. The mental and physical cost of torture can’t be disregarded. Not only is it physically and emotionally painful, it is also physically and emotionally traumatizing. For critics of the punishment and interrogation method, gaining information through the use of pain is incredibly barbaric and heinous.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of torture in the war on terror should be strictly forbidden because it explicitly breaks international laws, violates the basics of human dignity, and lacks substance in a consequentialist argument. Each nation is obligated to provide and protect the right to security and life for all its citizens. Any state must ensure protection of its citizens from torture because not only is its use unequivocally forbidden by several international laws, but also because it is a universal human right. Also, torture cannot be justified through a moral or consequentialist argument by any means. To keep their legitimacy, states must follow the standards of human rights when protecting their citizens from terrorist attacks or…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Legalization Of Torture

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This leads to two arguments in favor of torture by regulating and legalizing its practice, (1) legalization and regulation of torture will help prevent the most extreme forms of torture, and (2) the “institutionalization of torture, via torture warrants,” might not alleviate torture, but instead deviate the legal repercussions of torture away from the countries (McKinnon 167). However, if you endorse and legitimize a distinction between the treatment of terrorists and the treatment of citizens, the police and intelligence forces view terrorists as a less than other humans. In the context of human rights this is not acceptable. Human rights are degrational.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays