Essay On Utilization Of Torture

Superior Essays
Torture is defined as the intentional infliction of severe physical or mental pain or suffering for purposes such as obtaining information, a confession, punishing, or intimidating someone. However, there are several other modern methods to get one to admit, and torture should not be deemed as one. Torture can result in not only physical affliction, but also emotional and psychological. Every human beings rights should always be respected and guaranteed regardless of the situation. Torture is illegal all around the world, so if the government breaks the law, how should the people feel safe? The utilization of torture should not, under any circumstances, be justified. Torture as a concept is unethical, it dehumanizes people, and has a lot of consequences.
Torture should never be used as a substantial answer to any given situation. Observing it from an ethical perspective, torture treats the victim as a thing rather than a human being with value and purpose. It has shown in the past that once a country is accused of using torture, all credibility is lost and they are understandably looked down on. It is an extreme violation of human rights and should never be condoned. Torture will continue to stir in the victims of a cruel deity that will be kept in his or her’s conscious and will eternally cause agony and suffering. Some societies use
…show more content…
Whether its for the benefit of innocent people or sadistic satisfaction, it should never be justified. It alters a person's life to the worse. Every human should feel safe. If they are withholding information then it's their choice and they have a right of choice. Governments should not violate those human rights because they are the ones who should protect the people. Saving the innocent people shouldn't be a valuable excuse to torture someone. Torture is unethical, inhumane, an insufficient way to gather information, and society should never allow

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Legalization Of Torture

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Humans cannot be classified based on their actions. The legalization of any form of torture will desensitize people to the inhumane treatment people are subjected, despite if they deserve it or not. What happens when the tables are turned, when a country or the winning team is no longer the one writing history? Instead of protecting their citizens, countries will put them in greater danger of torture by other…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although criminals had made unforgivable mistakes they should not be paraded or dehumanized for the sake of society’s entertainment. So-ciety should never dehumanize other people for the sole purpose of amusement. The offender’s final moments of suffering should not be for the enjoyment of society. Also, culture will be ulti-mately desensitized and be left without any empathy or compassion if public executions will be the norm of the culture. The public will have no sense of morals and will no longer view criminals as humans, but as savages ready to be terminated from society.…

    • 1757 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture and cruel treatment is banned at all times, places, and including times of war (Torture). It is a terrible thing that still exists in some countries. People use it either to get information from people or to just hurt the person involved. We as people should not defend torture, because it is hurting people to get something. What is the reason that it is done?…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The question is, should people be held responsible for immoral behavior when most of their community or culture also behaves that way and the answer is yes, absolutely. No behavior that harms another should be regarded as obligatory or prohibited regardless of time, place, culture, or any other contingent circumstance. What should our response be to behavior in other cultures that are disturbing or seem morally wrong? In reality, the only response we can have to this atrocity is to respect it because we cannot intervene in another country’s laws and the way they chose to practice them in another part of the…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is the result of animalistic act of a human being , making them really a rational animal. Nobody is entitiled to experienced this horrific act of human. The torturer sometimes suffered in a mental disorder associated with their anger and their eagerness to hurt someone brutally. The victim itself after torture sometimes also suffered in a mental disorder but the difference is it is associated with "fear" wherein they got from being tortured. No person has the right to injure or harm others especially if the reasons for their torture are still unclear.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    People who are against euthanasia think that these laws against euthanasia are in place to prevent abuse and to protect people from unscrupulous doctors and others. They are not, and never have been, intended to make anyone suffer. In the other hand, supporters for active euthanasia believe that legislation against it is “violative of the fundamental concepts of liberty, freedom of choice, and self determination.” They base these beliefs on the content of the “Fourteenth Amendment” to the United States Constitution. The voluntary choice between life and death is to them, a basic human right which government has no right to decide (http://www.apa.org/pi/eol/arguments). Also, neither the law nor medical ethics requires that "everything be done" to keep a person alive.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From this approach, torture is morally unacceptable since it involves restricting an individual’s ability to use his independence and also involves breaking his will to attain results through inflicting pain. It is not human nature to inflict pain on each other and therefore there is no moral justification of torture from the perspective of the natural law theory. The actions of individuals should ensure the fulfillment of human beings; however, torture deprives the persecuted victim this…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Deontology Theory

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It also tells us that we can never use humans as a means to an end, but consider them as unique creatures with human dignity. And finally on categorical imperatives, it dictates us to treat other people as we ought to be treated. Therefore to sum all these we found the collection of social media data, violates the moral law in that the exercise don’t apply morals in both situations. The exercise only focuses on safety and to criminalize somebody, but not considering the innocents and their privacy. The action of collecting social media data is definitely treating people’s information as a means to an end.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    His freedom from the society is again achieved using violence. This example further proves the point that people should never have to get to the instance where the only way to gain alleviation is by carrying out harmful actions. Also with this point, society should not shelter people from the truth. Even though it seems like it is helpful, hiding awful truth only leads to people’s minds becoming so limited and makes it even more…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Finally, the criminal justice should treat everyone equal despite their morality beliefs. Even though the crimes may look like they were committed for the greater good, it doesn 't stop from being a crime. Taking an innocent life will never be good. A good act should be helping people, not killing them. Killing people should never be counted as a “compassion” act, it should never have a lenient law.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays