Should Judges Be Elected Or Appointed Essay

Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice. On one side of this equation, there are those who argue that appointing officials is unconstitutional, while on the other side they may claim that appointing government officials is the righteous way. Relying on the only method of selection can result in a problematic and a broken judicial system and, I believe that Supreme Court judges should be both appointed and then elected …show more content…
No two minds are alike and therefore, everyone has different viewpoints and ideas. Of course, this might end in those engaged in this debate assailing each other, however, it is important to understand every argument. In this case, both sides propose good arguments as to why Supreme Court judges should either be appointed or elected. This is why I believe our judiciary system should incorporate the election process into this branch. This does not mean that we should purely rely on the general public to select someone to serve, but let the people’s votes have some power against the president and senate as to who they think should hold office. If people on the opposing side of those who hold office share their voice through an equal form of voting, we will be one step closer to achieving unity within our