Sherman's Total War

Superior Essays
Sherman’s Total War Sherman’s March to the Sea and the Carolinas Campaign employed total warfare, an essential tactic to defeating the Confederate Army. Union General William T. Sherman’s plan was a key factor in winning the civil war. His plan was to lead a destructive march to the sea and through the Carolinas, a risky idea. On this brutal march Sherman guarantees success with total war; a tactic he pioneered. The resistance that was left to face Sherman’s army was a picnic for him to defeat. The Union’s victory would not have been possible without what Sherman accomplished on his march. Sherman wrote his plan to Ulysses S. Grant saying what he would accomplish through his march. Both Lincoln and Grant reluctantly agreed to Sherman’s plan. …show more content…
Sherman set out with 60,000 men on November 15, 1864 to march to Savannah. To make the entire South feel the cold harsh hands of war General Sherman used total warfare. Total war was a tactic Sherman developed, in which he would lead a destructive march to the Savannah port. His troops burned down and pillaged towns and homes. They either burned everything or they took it. In November 1864 Sherman “sent 35,000 troops” back to defend Nashville (Hill 31). Sherman ordered the people to leave Atlanta; which was huge punishment to the Atlanta civilians. He believed that the people of Atlanta would be safer if they were away, and with friends. They burned everything of military value in Atlanta, and in doing so burned 1/3 of the city. The Union forces were spread 60 miles wide like a wave of mass destruction. General Sherman was accused of being inhumane for his actions. After capturing the port in Savannah Sherman’s next move was to join forces with Ulysses S. Grant to defeat Robert E. Lee’s army on the Richmond-Petersburg front, and to lead a second march through the Carolinas. Sherman’s troops would rely on Georgia farms for food. His troops paused regularly to wreak railroads, burn factories, cotton gins, and anything else that may be valuable to the Confederacy. The troops brought sheer destruction to Georgia. The worst event was the burning of Columbia. Through the march Sherman …show more content…
By March Sherman’s forces crossed into North Carolina. Although Sherman was seen as a cruel General because of the destructive march he led; he offered generous surrender terms. Sherman got many armies to surrender to him, including Johnston’s army on April, 26. He captured Savannah on December 21, 1864. Sherman occupied the capital of North Carolina, Raleigh. South Carolina seceded, and made the whole army want to wreak vengeance on them. Though the Union armies fought for slave rights; hundreds of slaves found their path to freedom blocked because of burned down bridges. Within in weeks of capturing Raleigh the war ended. Sherman sent a telegram to President Lincoln stating his achievement. Slaves rejoiced at their emancipation for they were liberated by the Union. Through Sherman’s tactic of total warfare the Union guaranteed their victory. His precise plan to lead a destructive march to the sea and through the Carolinas was very important. Conventional warfare would not have won the North’s victory. Total warfare struck fear into the hearts of the women and children of the south, and terrorized the soldiers. It brought the Confederacy to its knees. Sherman’s march truly showed how weak the Confederacy had

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Vicksburg Mission Command

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Major General Ulysses S. Grant implemented good mission command during the Siege of Vicksburg by creating a clear commander’s intent, accepting prudent risk, and exercising disciplined initiative resulting in the victory. Grant was appointed commander of the Department of the Tennessee in October of 1962. Almost immediately he began preparations for combined land and naval operations against the Confederate-held Vicksburg . Vicksburg was one of the last strongholds and was used as a main supply line to ship supplies to the Confederate Armies. Grant’s land force cut off the supply line from Jackson to Vicksburg before capturing the city.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But Robert E. Lee and Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson were able to defeat anybody who Abraham Lincoln sent to defend the Union. The war's nature and direction changed after 1862, but Lee attacked Maryland and was defeated at Antietam. After numerous attempts to capture and defeat Lee, Lincoln made the Emancipation Proclamation undermine southern efforts and unify northerners. The Union turned the tables by defeating Lee's army in Gettysburg and taking Vicksburg to gain full control of Mississippi. Abraham Lincoln got reelected, while the common people suffered from hunger, disease, and lawlessness.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The battle brought a morale boost to the North. The Union was so dark and depressed just one week prior to the battle, they went “from the depths of despondency to the height of exultation, from defeat to glorious victory”. (135) The Northern newspapers declared, “GREAT VICTORY”. (135) Confidence was restored in the North and enthusiasm to the troops.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prior to the fall of Charleston, General Lincoln was unable to conduct a southern campaign to defend the ever important state of South Carolina.6 General Lincoln made several omissions to his own inability to command a large army and his inability to properly manage a major campaign and blamed it on his lack of command experience.7 He expressed his concerns to both Congress and General Washington, but they in turn blamed General Lincoln for not seeing the bigger picture to the purpose of the campaign and taking in the consideration and interest of the state of South Carolina.8 in addition to General Lincoln’s inability to wage a proper campaign, both the Congress and the state of South Carolina failed to raise and supply General Lincoln with an adequate number to troops to defend the state and its important ports that the British sought to capture.9 With the mix of General Lincoln’s shortcomings and the lack of proper troop support from both Congress and the state of South Carolina created a perfect storm for a long siege of…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ulysses S Grant showed his competence and expertise in military strategy from early on in the war, until the bitter end. Starting in february of 1861 at the battle of Ft. Henry / Donaldson, Grant was given the order to free up the Mississippi River by taking two Southern forts. His…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After reading Daniel Sutherland’s “Abraham Lincoln, John Pope and the Origins of Total War”, Sutherland describes how Sherman/Grant may have carried out a dominant plan in successfully ending the war, but that John Pope deserves the majority of the credit for originating it. One of Sutherland’s points he tries to get across to the reader is how the Lincoln’s 1862 summer is pushed towards making drastic, yet rushed decisions on the lasting conflict between the north and south over slavery. Because of this, Sutherland describes how Lincoln hires John Pope to direct an army to victory with a plan unlike any other, planning to strike hard and fast to end the conflict. However, Sutherland also describes how Pope’s plan and leadership backfires due to a poorly planned, aggressive evasion, leaving Sherman/Grant to take over Pope’s failed idea, which is then carried out and wins the war. For this, I believe that Sherman/Grant’s “idea“ to win the war is a bit unfair due to using Pope’s plan, however to a positive decent as the United States eventually benefits from the resolution.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When one thinks of the Civil War in the United States, the Union winning that war and how the deficiencies of the South plagued them are some concepts that would come to the mind. This was certainly the case for author David H. Donald in his book, Why the North Won the Civil War. The book consists of essays written by different historians explaining why they thought the Union won the war. The essays focused on a specific reason behind the victory of the Union. Of all the writers who contributed to Why the North Won the Civil War, David H. Donald presents the strongest thesis.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rebuttal: If Grant had not captured Vicksburg, situated on the banks of the Mississippi river, which gave Union forces complete control of the Mississippi river, the Confederacy would have been able to use the Mississippi river to transport supplies, would not have split the South into two and stopped Southerners from getting much needed supplies coming in from the west. “A Yankee captain wrote home to his wife “The backbone of the Rebellion is this day broken. The Confederacy is divided…Vicksburg is ours. The Mississippi River is opened, and Gen. Grant is to be our next President.” (P. 407 Roark)…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The battle was a much needed morale boost for the Union as a whole and ultimately served as the defeat of Tennessee and the establishment of a major supply hub. The Union Army built the largest fortress of the war in Murfreesboro following the battle to secure the rail line. From there they stayed encamped until the summer of 1863 while rebuilding their force. The Confederates moved south to Tullahoma, TN and continued to be defeated and eventually pushed out of Tennessee. This allowed for the follow on push into the Deep South, to include General Sherman 's March through Georgia.…

    • 2331 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    March To The Sea Dbq

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The March to the Sea was a terrorist attack planned by the Union General William T. Sherman. Coming from Atlanta, he led around 60,000 men on a 285-mile march to frighten Georgia. They did not harm the people who tried to stop them, yet stole the food, livestock, and burnt houses and barns to the ground of those who did. The reason for this attack was to make the “old and young, rich and poor, feel the hard hand of war” Sherman explained. General Grant’s two campaigns for 1864 were the capture of Richmond, VA, and Atlanta GA.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fort Sumter Essay

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jefferson Davis decision to take the fort showed his strength and devotion to the Confederate States, and efficiently coerced other states to join his cause. However, President Lincoln displayed his brilliant tactics by holding his ground in regards to the Constitution and by entrapping the Confederate soldiers to be the aggressors or to be seen as weak. Without a doubt, both the Union and the Confederates were led by ingenious…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The civil was a major part of American history which determined what kind of nation it would become. While the revolution created the United States the Civil War was going to decide whether the nation was going to be a confederation or an individual nation. This would also resolve two major factor that were in constant conflict with each other, which was the fact that either the United States would become a nation of equal right to all races and having freedom for all or continue to be one of the largest slaveholding country’s in the world. The North and the South had established to completely different economies that relied on many different resources.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sherman once blurted out to a fellow officer: "I am a damned sight smarter than Grant; I know a great deal more about war, military history, strategy and grand tactics than he does....” (Military Leadership of North and South) Sherman recognized that the Northern military leaders were smarter and knew what it would take to win the Civil war. The Northern leaders were smart enough to prohibit freedom of speech and other liberties to keep the soldiers obedient and disciplined. They won the war due to the superiority of the Northern leaders and their ability to suspend certain liberties, the advantage that allowed the little guy to win in the past, that the South…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    General Robert E. Lee and Colonel Walton had accomplished quite a feat. The Union army outnumbering the Confederates proved not to be a factor due to the effects of artillery. It appeared as if the Confederates had the Union army “right in the palm of their hands”. The loss left General Burnside and his remaining troops scarred and defeated. The defeat eventually led to General Burnside offering his resignation, President Lincoln accepted and soon appointed a new commander.…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays