Search And Seizure Research Paper

Improved Essays
Consent to search and seizure should be granted in a household in which two persons share a computer but use different login names and passwords when both parties are present and both most give consent otherwise officers can only search the consenting persons portion of the computer. If the one person is present and the other person isn’t the only way the person who is home has authority to consent to a search of the whole computer is by providing passwords for both users. It is recommended that you get consent in writing and make sure the individual understands the scope of consent as a layman would. Also, be very specific and detailed in the request for consent (Knetzger, 2008).
Defendants may claim that the person who granted consent to search and seizure did not have the authority to do so. Law enforcement can establish that a person has the authority to grant consent by making sure the person has common
…show more content…
I say this because probable cause has a gray area. An example is an officer can say they had probable cause to search the vehicle because the suspect was acting suspiciously. The word suspiciously has such a negative impact due to the wide range that it allowed to be used. Lots of people fear the police and/or they are uncomfortable when they are stopped by law enforcement. I am one of the people who shake and trembles the whole time I am pulled over with the officer. I was pulled over when I was twenty by what I thought was a police car. The man came to my window in a law enforcement uniform I was pulled from my vehicle and sexually assaulted. The guy was never caught. I have been asked for consent to search because I looked nervous and I was fidgety. These actions lead police to think that I was on drugs or hiding something. Then there are some mentally handicapped people who can function higher on some levels and lower on

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Sierra Fischer Exam 3 Answer According to the Fourth Amendment, an officer must have probable cause or a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed in order to search and seize an individual. Speeding, as well as having tinted windows and a taillight being out is enough reasonable suspicicion to pull Lil Flet over and inspect the car. As breaking the law gives an officer a reasonable belief that there may be evidence of a crime located within the vehicle. Additionally, identifying the smell of a drug is enough grounds for a search as it gives the officer probable cause.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this case the woman voluntarily went to the police station to interview with two detectives for over an hour. There are not enough facts given to know the interaction between the woman and the detectives during the interview. Also, there was no indication she was either physically restrained with handcuffs nor told expressly she could not leave. In addition, the detectives never told her she was a suspect and after the interview concluded, detained her briefly upon learning about the search warrant instead of immediately letting her…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under the public safety exception, where officers engage in a custodial interrogation before Miranda warnings, and if reasonably prompted by a concern for the public safety or the safety of the arresting officers, a suspect’s statements are admissible as evidence. (New York v. Quarles (1984) 476 U.S. 656 (holding that the need for answers to questions in a situation posing a threat to the public safety outweighs the need for the prophylactic rule protecting the Fifth Amendment’s privilege against self-incrimination).) In essence, an officer must have a reasonable need to protect the public or themselves from immediate danger. Id. Moreover, the applicability of the public safety exception is not dependent upon the subjective motivation of the questioning officer.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stop And Frisk Case Study

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Officers only need a reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing. The term “Stop and Frisk” is a technique which is utilized by police officials for the reduction of crime through stopping and searching the individual(s) they suspect of committing a crime or in possession of illegal weapons or drugs. This policy has been under a constant debate based on the facts that it promotes racial profiling, that stops can be considered illegal, and this policy invades the privacy of all individuals.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court ruled that a person can give consent to search if the facts are provided to the police at the time of entering the house. Probable cause is not needed when consent is given, a child cannot give consent a parent can give consent on the child. It is hard to prove that suspect is impaired or have mental issues when giving consent. Consent can be taken away anytime and the police would have to stop searching the property or…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Probable Cause Exists

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Consent is one of the many types of exceptions that typically involves an individual giving law enforcement the right to search him or herself or their residence without a warrant. In order for the consent to be valid, it must be given without coercion or deceit. For the second exception, search incident to lawful arrest, law enforcement officers are allowed to legally search a person or their surroundings immediately after their arrest no matter what the individual was arrested for. Once the suspect is removed from the premises where the arrest took place all searches must come to an end. The purpose of this exception is to locate any possible weapons and provide a sense of safety to the officer during the process of an arrest.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Moot Court Case

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment was created by our Founding Fathers for this exact reason. If a police officer can conduct a warrantless search without receiving adequate consent then our Fourth Amendment right to privacy will continue to be violated, a violation our great Constitution does not permit. In Matlock, the court decided that a third party could give consent to search if they had common authority over the object or premises. U.S. v. Matlock, 415 S. Ct. 164, 171 (1974).…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment: Search and Seizure In the Fourth Amendment, it states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated” (Cornell University of Law). The Fourth Amendment states its main idea in this statement and through it American citizens and their belongings and records are protected from surveillance, searches, and seizures. However, in today’s digital world government officials have used what could be called an unconstitutional approach to the Fourth Amendment, causing them to monitor phone conversations. There have also been instances where personal records have been gained by law enforcement without any relevant reason.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Search And Seizure

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Pages

    No, I do not believe it is too much of a burden on law enforcement. I believe the problem is a lack of training and consistent reinforcement of keeping abreast of current and new laws and procedures. The average patrol officer is not usually included in the drafting of search warrants, collecting evidence, Title VI, or being involved in complex cases which require a more in-depth understanding of search and seizure for example. So, it becomes incumbent upon them to make sure they are abreast of the law and procedures, even if their department does not. I believe many officers lack a clear understanding of what they can and cannot do in regards to search and seizure, and thus, do not go any further than what they understand or are comfortable…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yes, the officer needs to obtain a warrant to make an arrest. Law enforcement need to get arrest warrants before apprehending suspects inside of their homes or personal businesses. If it is needed, an additional officer can be presented on the outside the suspects home on keep them from trying to flee the scene while law enforcement try to acquire a warrant. Although, warrantless arrests in the home are legitimate in specific situations if urgent conditions exist that make it impossible for the law enforcement agencies to get a warrant.…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This answers some questions proposed in introduction part. The consenting party, has the right to give or refuse the consent, and it must be voluntary, consequences and items asked to consent must be explained to the consenting party. Back to the second condition, what does it mean by having the authority to give the consent? My friend’s USB key is on my computer, do I have the authority? R. v. Duarte (1987) states that “an authorized occupant of a residence may give consent to a search.”…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He had asked me to put my hands behind me back, then he pulled out the handcuffs. I was under arrest for 'Assault By Deadly Contact, Causing Bodily Injury'. I wasn't even told my Miranda rights. I was just told that I was lucky to have Juvey, because I comitted a felony and I'd be spending a year in prison, if I was older. I was also harassed by the officer, because I had remained silent throughout the car…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Stop And Frisk

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Stop and frisk should not be legal because many times these searches do…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The statement, “The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places,” is one of the most controversial statements in Criminal Procedure. The amendment’s purpose is to secure individuals’ rights to privacy within their houses, papers, and defends them against unreasonable searches and seizures. However, to what extent does the law preserve a person’s privacy? The Law of Search and Seizure and the Search Warrant, give the government strict to stipulations as to how they are able to rightfully obtain information that is presumed to be private. Although Searches, Seizures and Warrants seem to have simple guidelines, they are each intricate categories.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction Stop and frisk tactics have been used to preserve public safety and officer well-being. A stop and frisk is a non-intrusive police stop and pat-down based on the reasonable suspicion in relation to a crime that has happened, will happen, or is in the process of being carried out (Cornell Law School, 2017). Stop and frisk situations are highly common and the reported instances have increased by approximately 7% annually (Hovhannisyan, 2006). However, the approach is highly controversial because it operates primarily on officers' perceptions and opinions, which opens the door to personal prejudices dictating the usage. This executive summary includes the advantages and disadvantages involved in stop and frisk procedures as well as the constitutionality and recommendations to improve the approach.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays