4th Amendment Case Study Answers

Improved Essays
Sierra Fischer
Exam 3 Answer

According to the Fourth Amendment, an officer must have probable cause or a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed in order to search and seize an individual. Speeding, as well as having tinted windows and a taillight being out is enough reasonable suspicicion to pull Lil Flet over and inspect the car. As breaking the law gives an officer a reasonable belief that there may be evidence of a crime located within the vehicle. Additionally, identifying the smell of a drug is enough grounds for a search as it gives the officer probable cause. In this instance, it is constitutional for the officer to ask the four men to step out of the car, seize them, and search them. A car is considered public in that it can travel from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and therefore there is
…show more content…
However if the officer had pulled these individuals over soley based on the color of their skin, he would not be able to search and seize the individuals. The fourth amendment forbids an officer to search and seize soley on the basis of race, and if the officer had racially profiled the individuals then they could have filed a motion to suppress. However, the officer acted within the scope of the seizure by having legitimate interest and suspicions.
The Fourth Amendment clearly states that an officer may search the person arrested, those in plain view of the officer and the accused, and things or places that the acussed person can touch, or that is otherwise in their immediate personal control without a warrant as long as there is legitimate reasoning and it is not an unreasonable search. Since there was reasonable suspicion based on the taillight outage, tinted windows, and the smell of marijunana, the officer has grounds for search and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Police have probable cause to arrest passengers in a vehicle where an illegal substance are found, as the presence of drugs allows reasonable officers to conclude that probable causes exist that a crime has been committed in their presence. Due to the small and contained area of a vehicle it is reasonable to assume that all occupants have knowledge or possession of the illegal…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Holding: No. The actions of Officer Turek did not violate the defendants Fourth Amendment rights to be free from unreasonable seizure. The reason for this is because the Fourth Amendment does not prohibit a warrantless arrest for a minor criminal offense. A seatbelt violation is considered a minor criminal offense by law and is punishable only by a fine, therefore the seizure was…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments violated? Holding: The Trial Court held that the officer did have probable cause to search the vehicle and arrest the three men. The Supreme Court held that the officer did have probable cause to believe that Pringle had committed the crime of possession of a controlled substance. The Supreme Courts holding that the officer had probable cause to arrest Pringle also proves that the officer did not violate the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Coolidge V. S. 403 Essay

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The United States Supreme Court denied that also. It was mentioned that plain view is not reasonable enough because evidence has to be discovered inadvertently. To further explain, the police had more than enough time and opportunities to acquire a valid warrant. The police knew all the information in advance about the suspect’s home, vehicle and the suspect. Most importantly, there was nothing dangerous inside the vehicle or contraband inside (“Coolidge v. New Hampshire 403 U.S. 443 (1971),” n.d.).…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    574, 13 A.L.R. 1159], holding that Fourth Amendment proscriptions against unreasonable searches and seizures do not apply to private conduct, is still good law and controlling” (Stanford Law School,…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Achman Case Study

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the search, police found things like a Uzi machine gun, a .38 caliber revolver, two stun guns, and a handcuff key, but did not find the supposedly stolen stuff. Police Officers did confiscate the weapons while in search for the stolen items and used it in court. So therefore his fourth amendment was violated. The 4th amendment states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. " This action performed by the police officers reminds me of the supreme court case, Mapp V. Ohio.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He pursues Bob and follows him into an apartment building, where he places him under arrest and searches his pockets. This search in constitutional since he placed Bob under arrest before searching him for weapons or other items that could pose a risk. As Bob was fleeing Officer Casey noticed him throwing something into apartment 101. After he hands Bob over to Officer Edwards, Officer Casey opens the door to apartment 101. Inside he finds a handgun and notices an old odor of marijuana.…

    • 1762 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    By neglecting the opportunity to observe the mobile home for ongoing criminal activity, law enforcement deemed the anonymous tip appropriate evidence to conduct a search, and proceeded to do so. The case of Navarette v. California, 572 U.S. __ (2014) further analyzes the weight of credibility from an anonymous tip, while also noting the importance of surrounding circumstances. An anonymous tip led to observance of a vehicle that indeed seemed to be operated recklessly, when police officers stopped the vehicle, then later deemed the scent of marijuana probable cause and searched it. This case deemed reliability proven through ongoing circumstances sufficient as the right to stop due to reasonable suspicion, but did not establish probable cause based on its own merit. The right to search stemmed solely from the scent of marijuana instead, being established by State v. Greenwood 301 N.C. 705 (1981) as probable cause.…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After reading this case, I am convinced that all officers needs to be asked a series of questions to insure that they are not racist against any ethnicity. If this was done, then I’m sure there would not be as many African Americans getting stopped and frisked or excessive force used on minorities as a…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Moot Court Case

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    DAVID FALLSBAUER’S RIGHTS UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT WERE VIOLATED BY THE POLICE OFFICERS, BECAUSE WHEN FACED WITH AMBIGUITY REGARDING THE A THIRD PARTY’S CONSENT TO SEARCH THEY FAILED TO MAKE A FURTHER INQUIRY. BY DOING SO, THE OFFICERS VIOLATED DAVID’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY. The primary question before this Court is whether police officers must make a further inquiry when faced with an ambiguity regarding a third party’s consent to search. The Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals have taken different views when deciding the actions a police officer must take when faced with an ambiguity pertaining to third party consent. It is crucial to our society that a person’s right to privacy is protected and able to be exercised.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment Do you know you have the right to say NO?. The Fourth Amendment in other words Search and Seizures allows one to say no until proper legal document or warrant is shown to search or seized someone’s home, car, personal item and to protect people rights to privacy from the government intrusions. Meaning the government can’t use police force in which would expose citizens. Also the Fourth Amendment respects people rights and that it should not be violated. The Fourth Amendment created a major impact in today’s society not many citizens; teenager and adult are aware of their Fourth Amendment rights.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment states "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. " It prohibits…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fourth Amendment In Texas

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As well the court also stated that detaining a person to require him to identify himself with lack of evidence against him/her violates their Fourth Amendment right. The Fourth Amendment requires such action,or that the seizure should be carried out pursuant to plan embodying explicit,neutral limitations of individual officers. In other words, a police officer can’t arrest you,detain you,or search you without a search warrant or an arrest warnat. Though there are some expectations on getting search or being detained,like for instances if a police officer asks your permission to search in your belongings and you agree then that’s not considered an intrusion of your privacy because you allowed him/her to search in your belongings. Same goes for being arrested because in order to be charged with a crime police officers must have reasonable suspicion and enough evidence to charge you with that crime.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I'm confused, but in this case, I consider that the police seemed to violate the Fourth Amendment, which enforces to guard the citizen's privacy rights and restricts the police against unreasonable searches and seizures. As a result, the drugs seized at Jim's house should not be used as evidence to convict him. It is the duty of the police department to update their databases often to avoid such situations. In addition, they must ensure all searches and arrests are legal.…

    • 80 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A vehicle is less than a full arrest and the level of it, is that probable cause supports a temporary detention less than required to a full arrest. The detention starts when the officer is coming to a vehicle that is stopped. As soon as the officer turns on his red lights, is not a detention whether if the vehicle is already parked, and the officer gets out to ask the driver for his or her identification or license. Detention needs to have a reasonable suspicion if the person doing criminal activity, is about to occur in a criminal activity, or has been recently been doing criminal activity. “People v. Remiro, a state appellate court upheld the stopping of the vehicle on the basis of the officer’s reasonable suspicion.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays