Rothenberg's Arguments And Summary

Improved Essays
7. David Rothenberg focuses on Aristotle’s objection to his position. Aristotle defines the cause of nature in four separate ways: material cause, formal cause, efficient cause, and final cause. These four separate causes cast nature as the omnipresent, enveloping cause of everything in the universe. Consequently, Aristotle does not set any limitation to nature and its causes. Nature becomes the cause of nature in absolute. Thus, Aristotle presents a fallacy of a circular argument. By claiming that nature causes nature, he supports his claim with the exact same premise. Rothenberg examines this fallacy as he refutes this idea by responding to this objection.
8. In response to Aristotle’s objections, Rothenberg examines each cause within the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Callarman’s argument is the most accurate view of Into The Wild and Chris McCandless’s decision. Chris made an ignorant decision based on his current feelings and how his parents treated him. You can’t succeed in the future with your actions at this point and time, but you sure can throw out your future with your current actions. And that is exactly what Chris did, he went from graduating from Emory University, to moving into the Alaskan wilderness and dying. He had the foundation of his life set, ready to take on the next step of his life, but he believed that the wild would hold something valuable for him to find.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    God and Nature were one of the biggest factors of…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carr and Vonnegut have similar tones when addressing their arguments. To an extent, both authors use a sense of urgency or awareness in their writing. By using this method, they instill the issue more in the reader’s mind. Carr throughout his article continuously talks about the issue at hand with technology and by doing so he gradually wants the reader to take action through examples. For instance, Carr states the problem and consequently he states a solution for the overreliance in technology.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Let them keep their prodigious opinion of themselves and the bare name of Aristotle, whose five syllables delight the ignorant” (Petrarca 247). From ancient times, numerous scholars have exalted Aristotle because of his various contributions to topics and debates that seem to have withstood time until the early Renaissance period. Petrarch acknowledged Aristotle’s importance, but viewed him as only human and deferred true knowledge to God. Montaigne had similar feelings, describing humans as simple creatures, backing up his propositions with various anecdotal experiences. In their works, Petrarch and Montaigne regret man’s shortcoming in glorifying human philosophical thought as the key to wisdom, but recognize the value of human fallibility…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Macroevolution Dbq

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages

    7 years ago, a friend and I were in a science class, when the teacher asked us how old the earth was. Replying with the truth, I answered “6 to 7 thousand years”. When the teacher told me I was wrong, I was confused. And when I debated his answer of 12 billion or so years, I was scolded.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Entmans Argument Essay

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Entmans’ piece on framing left me believing that salience is key when reporting on a topic, or covering an issue. We touched on the fact that gatekeepers, or a few elites, decide what is newsworthy. Salience means “making a piece of information more noticeable, meaningful, or memorable to audiences… enhance[ing] the probability that receivers will receive the information, discern meaning and thus process it, and store it in memory” (Fiske & Taylor, 1991; Entman, 53). So, I pose this question: if the news we consume is predetermined, are our opinions on said issue truly authentic?…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Reason, in the sense it is used in this essay, is meant to describe the set of ideas that have guided the discipline of philosophy since the era of the Greeks, popularized by the works of Socrates, Aristotle, and Plato. These philosophers in particular have been crystalized in philosophy through the widespread adaption of “reason” as the ultimate form of higher thinking. Separate from reason, then, are emotions, which are generally regarded to be of lesser importance than reason, and are a main point of contention and criticism for the Greeks. It is this idealistic, romanticized, and highly exclusionary ideology of “reason,” as well as the fantasized “true world” – a world that is supposedly only reached through pure, intellectually rich reason – that drives these Nietzschean critiques. Likewise, the inability of the discipline of philosophy as a whole to reinvent itself without relying on this ideologically stale form of philosophy is another strong contention.…

    • 1873 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zayd Boucaud Professor Sarah Allen Philosophy December 4, 2017 "Cleanthes' Argument from Design" This essay will divulge into the deeper meaning of Cleanthes’ argument from design, with an explanation of not only his views, but the opposition’s as well (with a further understanding about why his argument may be proven invalid.) Cleanthes’ premises (leading to his valid conclusion) will have further, more simple explanations that will show his own reasoning in favor of God’s existence.) Flaws in his argument will be displayed subsequently, which will lead to the conclusion of his argument overall: ample validity but simply lacking soundness.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an effort to argue for the existence of God, Saint Thomas Aquinas provides five cosmological arguments in his piece “The Existence of God”. The second argument he states examines causes and effects and looks to explain these series in regard to their beginning, or first cause (43:1-2). Aquinas says that the chain of causes and effects cannot go back to “infinity” (43:60) because when the first cause is taken out, so is its effect and every following effect (43:61). I find this claim plausible because this would mean that there would be no “caused” things in existence. Aquinas follows to say that “there obviously are such causes” (43:62) in existence, so the first cause must not have been taken away.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Warren J. Blumenfeld is a progressive author dedicated to the forward evolution of the United States and its extremely reserved systems. Being a well decorated writer in the Purple press and The Beacon press with modern and progressive articles means that Blumenfeld has a plethora of knowledge when appealing to the reserved audience of The Huffington Post. Using this background serves him well in his opportunity to convey the problems with modern English through his extensive use of logos and ethos. In his argument about modern linguicism, Warren starts off the introduction with a joke his friend from Belgium told him about Americans’ arrogant anti-linguistic culture and their self-righteous beliefs.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the essay, “Evolution as Fact and Theory,” Stephen Gould defenses Charles Darwin’s theory of Evolution over the beliefs of creationist on God creating all organisms in the world. To further his support, he states his three arguments which are observational evidence, the imperfection of nature, and transitions found in fossil records to demonstrate that even though evolution is just a theory, there are plentiful evidence of facts that supports it. The essay was not just about justifying the theory of evolution to the creationist but also to reject the ideas of blindfolded views on scientific creationism. Throughout the essay, Gould acknowledges many of the major perspectives of the scientific world to support the theory of evolution that…

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle, like many other classic philosophers, emphasized the vitality and viability of reason, one can conclude that this exposure played an important role in Aquinas’s belief of human reason. Consequently, Aquinas rejected Augustine’s view of human reason and argued that God himself granted people this virtue as a way of engaging them to participate in his “eternal plan” (Aquinas 18). To present his argument, St. Augustine defined two kinds of laws: eternal law and natural law. Eternal law is God’s “eternal plan” in which he controls the course of the universe based on his own perspective (Aquinas 18). Human beings take part in this plan through natural law, which is essentially the use of reason as a means of fulfilling humanity’s role…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Additionally, Nietzsche’s divergence and matchless philosophy proves further that Aristotle’s view on ethics is reasonable and logically more sound because of the overall respect and…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Four Causes: Aristotle maintains that there are four causes, material, formal, efficient and final, that are responsible for explaining how change occurs in the world. In order to explain how things change, Aristotle argues that all four of these causes must be applied to the change that occurs (56, 197b25). Therefore, Aristotle claims that these four causes explain how things come to be. The first cause, the material cause, is essentially what the thing is made out of, or the raw materials that constitute that thing (48, 194b25).…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Why This? Why Anything?” Derek Parfit provides his demonstration of the fallibility of providing causal answers for the creation of the universe. In light of the fallibility of causal answers, Parfit seeks to incorporate his response to the creation of the universe with the use of non-causal answers which explains something’s existence in virtue of its properties, rather than attempting to follow an infinite chain of reasoning. While Parfit adequately demonstrates an inability to conform our reasoning to causal interactions for the creation and nature of the universe, his understanding of non-causal answers for the nature of the universe provides little insight into the questions he proposes and provides merely a factual understanding, rather than an explanatory one.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays