7 years ago, a friend and I were in a science class, when the teacher asked us how old the earth was. Replying with the truth, I answered “6 to 7 thousand years”. When the teacher told me I was wrong, I was confused. And when I debated his answer of 12 billion or so years, I was scolded.
In this essay I will show how science and creation can work together, and expose errors in Darwin’s theory. The first thing I will show is how macroevolution is different from microevolution. Macroevolution is a theory and not a law, according to the basic scientific theory.
Microevolution is a theory where organisms can change or become a new species through natural selection over a period of time. Macroevolution on the other hand is a theory that states that organisms can change into completely different organisms. While these two theories are both forms of evolution, they are entirely different. To see if they are accurate, you can look to the Bible for answers. In Genesis chapter 1, in verses 11, 21, and 24, the Bible clearly states that the living plants and creatures could only reproduce after their own kind. “And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every …show more content…
Organisms can only reproduce after their own kind. Therefore, macroevolution is a theory and will remain one. Nevertheless, it is observed as a fact in public schools, and universities. Macroevolution as a theory because we have never observed it actually happening. We have, however seen new species being formed, to an extent. According to the National Academy of Sciences, many theories cannot be proven for lack of information, for example, the heliocentric system. This theory could not be made into a fact because no one was yet able to look at the solar system, so it remained a theory until the telescope was
In this essay I will show how science and creation can work together, and expose errors in Darwin’s theory. The first thing I will show is how macroevolution is different from microevolution. Macroevolution is a theory and not a law, according to the basic scientific theory.
Microevolution is a theory where organisms can change or become a new species through natural selection over a period of time. Macroevolution on the other hand is a theory that states that organisms can change into completely different organisms. While these two theories are both forms of evolution, they are entirely different. To see if they are accurate, you can look to the Bible for answers. In Genesis chapter 1, in verses 11, 21, and 24, the Bible clearly states that the living plants and creatures could only reproduce after their own kind. “And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every …show more content…
Organisms can only reproduce after their own kind. Therefore, macroevolution is a theory and will remain one. Nevertheless, it is observed as a fact in public schools, and universities. Macroevolution as a theory because we have never observed it actually happening. We have, however seen new species being formed, to an extent. According to the National Academy of Sciences, many theories cannot be proven for lack of information, for example, the heliocentric system. This theory could not be made into a fact because no one was yet able to look at the solar system, so it remained a theory until the telescope was