Roe V. Wade Analysis

Great Essays
Chief Justice John Roberts stated that marriage is a matter of constitutional law. In Roe Vs Wade the court decided that abortion was protected under the Due process clause just like same sex marriage. The role of the court is not to make things legal that they personally feel is better for society. They go with what they perceive will be best for public policy. People who support same-sex marriage say that the country was already on its way toward fully legalizing it and that this decision just sped up the process and forced the last couple of states who were totally against it. Since pretty much all of the polls support that conclusion, this seems to be a perfect example of why we should have let the whole thing play out to begin with. A …show more content…
The Court is not to determine whether it is legal or not legal and is not to try to find ways to make something legal that is based on what they believe is better for society When the Court removes an issue from our society and they make sure that it’s based on what they perceives as the best public policy, A lot of people and some states have a natural resentment towards a particular ruling. Particularly when that ruling has no real basis in constitutional law. Prior to the decision on June 26th, 2015 gay and lesbian couples had the legal right to marry in 37 states already, and there were numerous pending legislative efforts to pass or further Establish rights. But because the ultimate decision of whether same-sex marriage would be legalized was decided in a courtroom and not in the public, it may pose a lot potential limitations and exceptions to the decision. Also, the Court opened itself to a whole new bucket of cases involving the Free Exercise Clause, because now religious people and organizations can claim that they are being forced to recognize same-sex marriages and that violates their First Amendment …show more content…
We have seen African Americans Struggle through life as they progressively finally gained their rights as United States citizens. Then we saw even more progress when woman started gaining their rights. Slowly but surely the USA has progressed into a country that is becoming fair and equal to everyone. Now more recently on June 26, 2015 same sex marriage has become legal in all fifty states and for many people that is a big step for them… for us as a country. June 26th, 2015 was a historic day when the ruling vote was 5-4. Comparing this to other landmark decisions would be up the with Brown VS board of education,RoeVS Wade, Obergefell v. Hodges says Tina Totenberg of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Many gay couples rushed to get married once the state level bans were lifted. Now that the federal government has recognized gay marriage, many states counties are still failing to recognize gay couples right to marriage. The premise is that gay marriage is immoral and considered a sin in most religions, so it should be banned and marriage should only count between men and women. The argument is that people who are attracted to someone of their same sex has nothing to do with their ability to receive the same basic rights as straight couples. The argument is when denying same-sex couples the right to marry, is discriminatory and a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hawaii then began handing out same sex licenses and caught the public 's eye. Since there were still many American’s who disagreed on same-sex marriage, they became frantic that same-sex couples would go to Hawaii to marry. In order to be certain this did not occur, Congress passed an act called The Defense of Marriage Act of 1996. This act stated that same-sex marriage would not have to be recognized in other states if their laws did not approve of it. The act also said that same-sex marriage would not be…

    • 1829 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both their states were depriving them of either justice or discrimination, which in return is why both petitioners in each case fought back against their state to fight for their rights. The case of Loving v. Virginia changed what the concept of marriage was. Marriage was first between a man and a woman of the same race. That is what marriage stood for in the early years, no interchanging races. However with this case, interracial marriage became legal.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This side of the argument, supported by laws made by the people, whereas the other side is a bunch of opinions or beliefs that not everyone share. Homosexuals won the freedom to marry whomever they want in June of 2015, that is when the Supreme Court ruled gay marriage legal in all fifty states. Not allowing gay marriage now is declared unconstitutional nonetheless taking away freedoms that the United States offers. Though same-sex couples cannot procreate, they can adopt, creating a wonderful, loving home for children in the foster care system or for those who get adopted from foreign countries. Many people will say that gay marriage should be illegal on the grounds that it was always the other way, but tons of rules were, “always that way,” until they were forced to change.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Under United States constitution, the democratic system should decide for gay marriage law. In Chief Justice Roberts’s dissenting opinion, he has delineated the supreme court’s position for gay marriage law. Therefore, he insisted that states government should reserve their states’ power for the gay marriage law. Due to the belief of social policy and fairness, many same-sex couples had appeal for the nationwide same-sex marriage legal approval. Unfortunately, they are bewildered on United States law system, the supreme court actually does not have the legal power to make gay marriage law but legislators and people.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is exhibited in the quotation: " Assimilation is not liberation, and the invocation of "equality" as the great attainment of these gay marriages should be challenged" (Cockburn). The ability to spend the rest of your life with the person you love is a choice of either, officially marking that bond though state marriage or refraining from it keeping bond a live bond. Any person apart of the LGBT community is seen with less authority for a reason not understood. Connecting towards the principles of John Rawls, gay people are placed as minorities in most states throughout the United States. It is unjust for any persons human rights to be set aside as less because of their gender.…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The American culture is rapidly changing and so is the moral code. The government is able to make changes to the laws to accommodate the people. For example, Baker and McConnell sued Nelson for denying marriage application because the Minnesota law on marriage doesn’t mention anything of gender (“Same-Sex Couple”, 2008). Before gay marriage was legal there was no mention of gender on the law of marriage. For this reason, legalizing gay marriage should not have been an argument.“”But, for better and for worse, traditional marriage has already been destroyed,” said E.J.…

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Trump states that Planned Parenthood’s services that include reproductive health are very beneficial to society, however, their main concern is making abortions available to women, which is something he does not support. If elected, Trump claims that he will seek to overturn the Roe v. Wade supreme court decision, thus, reforming the restrictions placed on abortion and limiting women’s right to privacy (2016 presidential candidates, 2016). As an attempt to overturn the Roe v. Wade decision, Trump plans to appoint Supreme Court justices that are pro-life and hopes to rid of the first trimester abortion law. Trump believes that the unborn child should have constitutional rights and plans to enact the “Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act” to limit abortion practices, (2016 presidential candidates, 2016).…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Same Sex Amendment Essay

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Some people do not understand the hesitation with changing the ban, while others cannot see any reason it should be changed. Here are the advantages and disadvantages that need to be addressed before an informed decision can be made. The number one argument against same sex marriage is that marriage is between a man and woman. When talking about religion this is true, the Bible states that this union is between a man and woman. However, not everyone is religious and in America we are allowed to practice any religion or none at all.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If a couple married in a civil union their "marriage" is only valid in the state that allows civil union. If a couple are in a state that doesn’t allow same sex marriage they have to go to a one that does, but even after that their marriage isn’t valid in their home state. However if the government steps in and legalize same sex marriage in all the states, the LGBT community would be equally represented everywhere. Since there is only 15 states that remain against same sex marriage, the government could wait and let time take care of this matter. But if the government intervening then the results would be immediate, while with states intervention it would take time to enforce the law and have the first marriage take place.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays