Robert Nozick himself is very aware of an indisputable fact or cause that some things you acquire will be by absolute chance that somehow you will bring in an entitlement to some piece of property according to his theory. For instance, winning the lottery. Nozick notes that there are some cases where you can gain some type of property by luck and it would be unjustified to just take it from you, since you obtained it in a way that masses understood and agreed to it. Robert Nozick uses cases like disaster luck or the luck of the market cycle and luck cause exploitation to differential entitlement and moral desert. Another case would be racial discrimination. Perhaps the lucky lottery winner doesn’t really deserve the money, although they are entitled to it. Justice is connected to entitlement. Despite the country it is still not clear that most of the general public find this to be a justifiable up to code …show more content…
Lets say there is a construction worker who falls under a spell of depression. If no one is building houses, they don’t have in demand skills. In a depression they compete in the unskilled labor market and have a good chance of not finding work due to the large pool of unemployed workers. Is it just to allow them to suffer due to these things beyond their control? Nozick reply would be something like “People have an obligation to save to risk business cycles. Private charities can provide aid to the unemployed.”. The problem with this is that not every single person is able to save money due to the expenses of living and providing for his or her family. Due to that charity will have a higher rick of falling short in major recessions and or