In the readings of “Equal Respect & Equal Shares,” David Schmidtz displays various arguments against equal shares as a principle of justice. Notably he is highly stringent in the case of equal shares as a principle of justice when contrasting with the principle of first possession. I will argue that many of the objections have been leveled against the act of first possession in light of equality as well as respect. I will focus on Schmidtz discussion of the benefits of first possession and the rewards reaped through the accruing of assets through the principle of first possession and note some clarifications that are needed in order to identify who happens to be benefiting the most in light of such a principle .Schmidtz…
In the article “What is a ‘System of Privilege”, sociologist and public speaker Allan G. Johnson explains how privilege, specifically white privilege in this case, works as a system. “Privilege does not guarantee good outcomes for the privileged group or bad outcomes for everyone else” according to Johnson, however, it does load the odds one way or the other. Unfortunately, social privilege is often invisible to those who experience them, claims Johnson. Johnson goes on to describe a few examples to validate his claim. For example, in a recent survey a group of volunteers were asked to close their eyes and picture a drug dealer.…
The author gives a "key" evidence for the meaning of "spared injustice" privileges. For instance, a Black person is stopped by the police without due cause that a white person is not. With this instance, the privilege is in spared an injustice suffered by the person of color, but with out further benefiting from that injustice. Differently, the "unjust enrichment privileges" is the white person getting benefits from the injustice to the persons of color. For instance, since police usually focus on the Black lawbreakers, they would be less concern on the whites who do break the laws.…
Nozick argued against end state or pattern principles of justice. People create wealth. The money that you acquired you can keep if you earned it fairly. For example, if person A has a car and person B has a bike and they interchange willingly, then each person would feel they received of greater or equal value for their exchange. If nobody hurts anyone, or manipulates anyone to get what they want then government should not interfere.…
Only a hypothetical contract such as such as a this, carried an original position in equality, would procedure principles of justice untiered by difference of bargaining power of knowledge.” (Reader page 203) This means if we're in an imaginary society where laws and social structure has been made, it is our job to make it as just as possible. His first principle of justice is that everyone is entitled to basic liberties. The second is the difference principle, which is meant to show there can be inequality within society if it can help those who are disadvantaged.…
The first additional principle is causation, this principle is tied to the civil aspect of law and refers to the notion that the accused committed the act and it was that act that caused damages to be incurred by the victim. The second principle is Harm; it must be proven that someone was harmed in the commotion of the act even if the victim being harmed is deemed society. The third additional principle is Punishment.…
During the Post World War II-time era America had the assumption that their society was the best, that assumption in more recent years of 1995 has changed into that America can do better. In the passage “Entitlement” from Robert Samuelson’s 1995 book The Good Life and Its Discontents Samuelson talks about a “paradox of our time” (Samuelson 1995). That paradox is entitlement, in 1995 America had adopted a different assumption on society creating the paradox of the American society which is feeling bad when doing good. In the passage Samuelson accurately explains the shifts in views, from the early century to the more recent years of 1995, of the American society and how they have evolved from the past to the present.…
Karl Marx, John Rawls, and Robert Nozick are three prominent philosophers whose political theories have an important place in the modern political debate about the role of the state, how society should be structured and the concept of justice. Karl Marx was born 1818, his major work was The Communist Manifesto published in 1848. Marx advocated for a type of socialism called communism where the dominant goals are the abolition of private property and class antagonisms through a revolution of the proletariat or working class. John Rawls was born in 1921, his major work was A Theory of Justice published in 1971. Rawl’s defended social liberalism, egalitarianism, and the welfare state in the form of distributive justice.…
What is privilege and how does it manifest itself? Privilege can be defined as a special right, advantage, or immunity granted or available only to a particular person or group of people. Privilege has been manifesting itself throughout history. The most common type of privilege is given to us because of our gender, race, social class, age, sexual orientation, and disability. It can be hard for some people to come to terms that they were born with certain privilege that some people will never receive in their lifetime, while others may choose to ignore the realities of privilege.…
Robert Nozick opposes Rawl’s view on the theory of justice by arguing that health care is not a right. His perspective states that people tend to seek medical treatment for more and more reasons when health care is seen as a right as opposed to a…
Privilege and oppression provides a framework for understanding how institutional structures and ideologies shapes individual experiences. Privilege and oppression also explains “how power operates in society” which led to the formation of “a dominant group and a marginalized group” (Launius and Hassel, Threshold Concepts, 72-73). “Oppression can be defined as prejudice and discrimination directed toward a group and perpetuated by the ideologies and practices of multiple social institutions” (Launius and Hassel, Threshold Concepts, 73). While, privilege refer to the “benefits, advantages, and power that accrue to members of a dominant group as a result of the oppression of marginalized group”, whether or not those with privilege recognized…
As a white male I am oblivious to the fact that I have privilege in this country as a poor white male I don’t tend to see much in the ways of advantage, but I do have them and I tend to see things in a different light because I never have them come up in conversation. I live a simple life and I try to treat everyone the same regardless of their color or gender. I do agree with all of the 6 reasons and know them to be true because some of them I am guilty of and I know a lot of people that are guilty of the ones that I may not be guilty of. The mindset of myself can be judgmental at times and it does usually end up in me feeling bad later on but I am just as guilty as most white males.…
Kurt Vonnegut’s imaginary dystopia depicted in his short story “Harrison Bergeron” is a perversion of the equality principle in that it pushes equality to an unfounded extreme—an extreme that crushes personal freedom. In this paper, I will argue that in “Harrison Bergeron” the equality principle is taken to mean the deprivation and literal handicapping of the privileged, while in reality the pursuit of equality is taken to mean the elevation of the underprivileged. In order to prove my thesis, I will begin by setting forth the terms of this paper and defining the equality principle.…
Another aspect of dealing with these refugees that we must be aware of is the recent political minefield surrounding their morality and innocence. While some like to demonize their being, and paint them all as bloodthirsty savages, the other group seems to think them innocent of any wrongdoing, and rebuffs any accusation against them as 'racism ' or 'xenophobia '. Both opinions are bigoted and do not accept the true humanity of these people, with all of its good and bad. However, this concept of a 'politically correct ' culture does little to solve current tensions, and makes it impossible to act if members of one ethnicity are found guilty of a crime, less one be labeled a 'racist '. One simply needs to look to the east towards the race…
Am I jus for my disobedient acts? I must be jus for each one that I have ever committed. Civil disobedience is a fracture within the law therefore there must a relishable reason to be disobedient. Yet the reason to go against the state would be due to negligence. Justice is associated with the concept of everything plays a natural role, coming from Feinberg and Gross.…