Essay On Distributive Justice

Superior Essays
Am I jus for my disobedient acts? I must be jus for each one that I have ever committed. Civil disobedience is a fracture within the law therefore there must a relishable reason to be disobedient. Yet the reason to go against the state would be due to negligence. Justice is associated with the concept of everything plays a natural role, coming from Feinberg and Gross. Justice must maintain the status quo for society. It is a just act as long as justice is being attempted in the proper context of justices; There are multiple forms of justice and those that decide to go against the state must know why. The need for civil disobedience can be seen when the people see a need for change in their community. There are times when a time for change has come and that time can be because politicians refuse to listen to the people or take action about a cause. Though not engaging is just as hard as not engaging in the situation. There is no limit to the amount of injustices committed and it is unfortunate though there the time when the people must go against other people. The goal is to be non violent however there are times when violent actions occur and this causes the public to suffer. The goal is to justify everyone through fair play or Distributive justice which defined as fairness for the people. A small example of distributive justice might …show more content…
When this happens the objectives become blurred which cause the need to break unjust laws. Those that benefit from the status quo will want keep as is and while others will battle for change. During the French Revolution there was a lot of talk about the situation and about a solution but eventually a war was put in place. Civil disobedience is set in order to change to the stage of order, and to change the status quo. There is always a reason for disobedience just as there is a reason to hit on the hot secretery at work. The goal is to make a

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    After those laws have been established, the legislative power must ensure that the laws made are ultimately for the good of the people. Additionally, Locke held the belief that the legislative power should not raise taxes on property unless they are given consent by the people or the representatives of the people. Locke believed that in the same way the legislative power would remain loyal to the will of the people, and the people had to be loyal to their government and not serve another. Under the surface there is an underlying trust that the people will respect the laws and rulings of their government, and that the government will only work to protect and preserve. Finally, the legislative power cannot place their burden of power in anyone else’s hands so as not to shift power to…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Disobedience In Society

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This paper defends the right of citizens to consciously disobey laws in their society, after examination. People have a right to form idiosyncratic beliefs through their own conscience and rationality. Individuals should demonstrate the values they believe are worth losing their life, liberty, and property, through their actions. The actions they choose should not cause irreversible damage. People, compelled to act must do so regardless of the justness of their society.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Some of them filled with ego and selfishness and some are kind hearted and selfless people, both are there. Morality or justice plays a pivotal role in our society to maintain the balance and peace among society and also makes a society a better place to live. If the whole society is immoral or unjust then there would be a chaos and it will become worthless to live there. Morality, we can call it norms but which are innate by nature note learned or it is kind of reinforcement by teaching. People don’t do injustice because they have fear of law or they don’t want listed their name in the criminal records, otherwise if the government give free rights to do what ever they want to do, they are just afraid of consequences of getting caught or acting unjustly .…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And if a government could perform their role in protecting people’s right, no harm should occur to such a society. Civil disobedience is a political act that should be exercised with a good aim to fight for public goods. It’s also crucial to be peaceful and non-violent. Civil disobedience exposes society to harm. It may encourage disrespect towards legal system, it could paralyze financial development and interfere with people’s daily living.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To an understanding in the Discourse on the Origin of Inequality that "the law had to be evaded in a thousand ways; inconveniences and disorders had to multiply continually in order to make them finally give some thought to confiding to private people the dangerous trust of public authority" (Rousseau 59). Although Rousseau's idea of a civil society took some developing, it still landed in the right outcome where equality among the people was the safest way to go, and not letting public authority rule their way of life. If this happened who knows how equality shows; it probably comes across as pure chaos. Ultimately, it goes to show that "unruly men [would] rush headlong into slavery" (Rousseau 59). There would be no protection to their being, they would simply be following Locke's idea of uncertainty where equality is presenting itself as an option.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience Thoreau declares, “The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think is right” (Ogunye). He ostensibly acknowledges no authority other than that of his own moral sense. In this essay, civil disobedience will be defined as the unwillingness to obey civil laws in an attempt to prompt change in governmental law or procedure, demonstrated by the use of nonviolent methods. The matter in question, then, is whether such civil disobedience is justified in a democratic society. The value of this essay’s argument is fairness; that is, defending human rights and granting each his or her due.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon Justice Analysis

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    However, since in reality, there is no ring of Gyges, it is in human’s best interests to do justice, for otherwise they will end up in the chaos. By acting just, a person wants to get justice in return. That is why it is better to be just – to end up in the best realistic option. Oppositely, it is bad to be an unjust person, since by picking injustice, the one will break the agreement and he will get bad things in return. This will lead to a universal injustice that will create the chaos in the society.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some laws are just so unacceptable that is not only the people’s right, but duty to disobey them. Following the laws that govern us blindly is a dangerous way to live. It is acceptable to go against the government when the government threatens lives of innocents and restricts free will, when the government loses the best interest of those it governs, and when the government neglects to acknowledge the voices of the people. It can only be expected that people…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While he acknowledges the importance of liberty, he believes that people should entrust authorities entirely with the judgment. What is more, people have to obey the judgment of the magistrate as they are driven by the good of public welfare, not by self interest. The ruler, however, has to be wise and impartial. Only then the judgment can be fair and just. Locke does not hide his distrust with masses as he believes that it is much better to put the power in the hands of a small group or individual rather than the whole community.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In order for people to effectively better the community, everyone must have an open mind so that everyone can discuss freely. Having a closed-mind keeps people from being able to express their opinions. Mill states that it is wrong to silence ones opinion because it robs “the human race, posterity as well as the existing generation.” (Mill) Mill describes that “human judgment is valuable only in so far as people remain open to criticism. Thus, the only time a person can be sure he is right is if he is constantly open to differing opinions; there must be a standing invitation to try to disprove his beliefs.” (SparkNotes) If someone’s beliefs are silenced, than others are robbed of the opinions. In order for people to grow, they must be aware of the views and opinions…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays