Nozick argued against end state or pattern principles of justice. People create wealth. The money that you acquired you can keep if you earned it fairly. For example, if person A has a car and person B has a bike and they interchange willingly, then each person would feel they received of greater or equal value for their exchange. If nobody hurts anyone, or manipulates anyone to get what they want then government should not interfere. You are entitled to whatever you can get through honest means if you are not intentionally manipulating anyone. If you don’t like something, then stop. For example, if you don’t like Verizon outrages prices then quit their services. If Verizon is the only servicing company in your area and you cannot stop their services due to inconveniences, then you must suffer the consequences of paying their outrages prices.
There is a possible objection to Nozicks argument. What actions should we take to have a justice society? In distributive justice, there is a distributive of goods and services and in a good justice system we distribute those goods and services equally with everyone. It would take the form of a communist society. …show more content…
He might say that how many Amish people are there now in the current world, that the reason there aren’t that many Amish people left in the world is because their system does not work to keep up with everyone’s demands. In an ideal world that would be great, but in a realistic world, it would not work. The doctor in a larger population might not want to be making the same amount of money as a garbage man, therefore possible doctors might not want to put themselves through the stresses of becoming a doctor causing less doctors to help people. For Nozick justice is about historical issues, how each individual transaction is placed. Therefore, it is unjust for the government to take any money that you have justly
There is a possible objection to Nozicks argument. What actions should we take to have a justice society? In distributive justice, there is a distributive of goods and services and in a good justice system we distribute those goods and services equally with everyone. It would take the form of a communist society. …show more content…
He might say that how many Amish people are there now in the current world, that the reason there aren’t that many Amish people left in the world is because their system does not work to keep up with everyone’s demands. In an ideal world that would be great, but in a realistic world, it would not work. The doctor in a larger population might not want to be making the same amount of money as a garbage man, therefore possible doctors might not want to put themselves through the stresses of becoming a doctor causing less doctors to help people. For Nozick justice is about historical issues, how each individual transaction is placed. Therefore, it is unjust for the government to take any money that you have justly