Hinton's View Of Egalitarianism

Improved Essays
Hinton’s article is not an attempt to introduce his own views or opinions about egalitarianism. The main purpose of this article is demonstrate a deeper and more collective understanding of egalitarianism from a number of different viewpoints. He explores the advantages and disadvantages, in his opinion, of each philosophy. His position on this argument is based off of a formula he derived called the common ownership formula. This formula states that “each human being as an equal co-owner of the worlds resources, may use those resources provided that the terms of their use are in conformity with principles that no co-owners who sought to find equitable principles of resource division” (Hinton 517). Wholly, his argument is constructed by the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Many philosophical scholars believe that justice, liberty, law, and equality are an important aspect among the commonwealth of the nation. Moreover, this paper will focus on the two important political philosophers that argue with the notion and importance of equality and justice in the western society. These philosophers include: Robert Nozick and John Rawls. John Rawls claims that equality and justice is derived from an equal distribution of opportunities, income, wealth, for the general social advantage of the citizen, which includes welfare. Whereas, Robert Nozick defines equality and justice as an entailment to oneself.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the readings of “Equal Respect & Equal Shares,” David Schmidtz displays various arguments against equal shares as a principle of justice. Notably he is highly stringent in the case of equal shares as a principle of justice when contrasting with the principle of first possession. I will argue that many of the objections have been leveled against the act of first possession in light of equality as well as respect. I will focus on Schmidtz discussion of the benefits of first possession and the rewards reaped through the accruing of assets through the principle of first possession and note some clarifications that are needed in order to identify who happens to be benefiting the most in light of such a principle .Schmidtz…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is it fair that one individual can effortlessly learn a subject in an hour, while it takes another a week of strenuous work? Is it fair that a wealthy person easily gets out of jail on bail, while a poor person stays in, although both were charged for the same crime? We all want to believe that equal and fair treatment for all can exist and is possible because all humans are made equal, however, complete equality in society in any period of time is an unrealistic and impractical aim. As Nancy Gibbs once noted, “Our cherished notions of what is equal and what is fair frequently conflict. Democracy presumes that we are all created equal; competition proves we are not, or else every contest would end in a tie.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 6, Dahl discusses some major topics about equality in regards to the government. Dahl debates the different equality as being self-evident, but people do not adopt it because opportunities are not equally distributed at birth. Certain circumstances and luck have compounded initial difference. A famous French writer was stupefied at the degree of social equality in the United States. Although, inequality appears to be a natural condition of humankind.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A mass movement of the 1960s was meant to assure fairness for all of America’s people. However, in the 1980s, Ronald Reagan ran government policies and tactics that had an immense negative impact on African Americans. In Invisible Jim Crow, Tillotson writes, “To the radical conservative with their emphasis on history and existing institutions (Farmer, 2006) this connotes that Americans should accept the status quo which for African Americans means accepting while privilege as part of the “natural human order”” (Tillotson, p.27). This shows that African Americans do not have a say in what the government decides to do and the restrictions that are put up against them.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Schmidtz and Cohen stand at two almost diametrically opposed positions of equality. Schmidtz argues for an equality of treatment, while Cohen argues for an equality of opportunity. Schmidtz’s argument for equality of treatment implies that everyone should be treated the same, even if that treatment will result in others not being well off (Schmidtz 114). Cohen, on the other hand, argues that everyone should be treated the same in regards to improving society Cohen’s argument addresses three kinds of equality of opportunity and presents them in a favorable light. These forms of equality can be visualized on a spectrum, with each form of equality becoming more radical as Cohen progresses his argument.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Euphemism In Australia

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Derived from the French word égal, egalitarianism, is a mythical ideology (Kolb, 2008, p. 661). In view of that, the egalitarianism doctrine favours western industrial societies as equals with equivalent…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wealth inequality in today's society also known as the wealth gap, is growing. The top one percent makes twenty-five times more than the average family (Close 2016). This glaring inequality frequently brings up the question of what ought to be done with the distribution of wealth and resources. American Political Philosopher, John Rawls’, bases his argument on the premise that there should be an equal distribution of wealth in society. Robert Nozick, one of Rawls' main critics, demonstrates how distributive justice and an equal distribution of wealth conflicts with a person's individual liberty.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Temporary Inequality

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout history and most of our lives, people often exposed to inequality. Despite the hardships inequality cast onto people, inequality does not always last. Two types of inequality exists; temporary and permanent inequality. Both are forms of inequality but in the case of temporary inequality, inequality is ended when everyone is at equal levels. Despite this ideal of inequality, permanent inequality is the most common and suppresses different races, socials groups, and etc.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the article “Is Inheritance Justified?”, D.W. Haslett argues that not only is inheritance not essential to capitalism but rather that inheritance is actually counterintuitive to capitalism. Haslett argues that three of the main capitalistic ideals; “distribution according to productivity”, “equal opportunity” and “freedom” directly contradict inheritance and he goes on to present a proposal that would abolish inheritance. I intend to argue that inheritance is in fact aligned with capitalism and will provide further evidence by calling to attention how Haslett’s plan to end inheritance would directly conflict with capitalism. I will start by highlighting how inheritance is supported by the first two ideals Haslett mentions as the two are…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The argument whether it’s efficient for a nation to have economic inequality is an argument that extends across economics and crosses into political philosophy. Out of the four schools, Libertarians are the only who advocate for inequality as long as increased wealth comes without rent seeking behavior. Libertarians are the most similar to the capitalist elements of society that exists in the United States. The other three advocate for a system that is more akin to socialism. Utilitarians, Rawlsians, and Marxists all advocate for the redistribution of income to create economic equality.…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There is a problem in society that everyone must come to terms with. Inequality. Inequality is a problem that can be solved in two main ways using government. The government can give everyone equal opportunity, or they can give everyone equal reward. One major inequality that is happening in society today is inequality in education, and solving this inequality is hard, maybe even impossible, because even if everyone was given the same opportunity to go to a good school, some wouldn’t work as hard and then would be less educated then someone who worked hard.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nonetheless what kind of species you are, whether you are human or animal, there is always a great urge for an utopian society. When living in the real world, many will want to create a “realm” where there is no violence or issues concerning “your kind.” How perfect would that be? Everyone living in a perfect environment; without issues concerning health, food, and minority. Richard Adams presents the struggles experienced by the rabbits in gaining an utopian society in his book, “Watership Down.”…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter nine Global Stratification, in our text book Sociology in Our Times by Diana Kendall gives us a deep insight on the perspectives and theory’s that help us to view wealth, poverty, and global inequalities from different sides. Having a global perspective on wealth and poverty allows members of society to think about a situation as it relates to the rest of the world. With this we also look into global inequality through two different theories, the world systems theory and the new international division of labor theory. Wealth can be defined in our society as having a lot money, disposable income, or just being able to live that high level of standards, poverty however is the complete opposite. Poverty is defined as the state of being…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Egalitarianism

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For several centuries, individuals have assumed that one particular gender, race, and etc. , are better than and superior to the other, but that mentality is incorrect. Egalitarianism is the belief that all people should have equal rights, and that no particular type of person is favored, or preferred. Many countries today are not for equality and don’t support egalitarianism. America's government should strive to have an egalitarian society because it ensures people to be paid equally, it also allows people to have the same opportunities, and it is just an humane thing to do.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays