Summary: The Role Of Prohibition In Interracial Marriage

Great Essays
What would someone do if one’s better half had to be separated by law because of the state they lived in? Richard Loving and his “colored” wife Mildred had to go through that same situation when they lived in their home in the state of Virginia while illegally being married. After being kicked out of their home state, Richard and Mildred decided to take their issue to the Supreme Court and later their story becomes an inspirational documentary. While there are many stories out there about illegal intermarriage and its impact on the people, The Lovings act of civil disobedience in illegal marriage played a crucial role in ending the prohibition in interracial marriage in America.
Richard and Mildred Loving lived a simple country life in their home state of Virginia. The two of them grew up in the rural area of Caroline County, Virginia, and fell in love. While he was quiet, and, in public, might appear impolite, she was gentle and soft-spoken. They seemed like the perfect couple, but there was one problem, Mildred had brown skin. Mildred being a "colored" woman, made her off-limits as a marriage partner for Richard in the eyes of the law. Neither Richard's nor Mildred's family saw anything wrong with their relationship. According to one of the family members “ It had been love at first
…show more content…
Supreme Court. In the spring of 1967, arguments began over the constitutionality of Virginia miscegenation law. The case was identified as Loving v. Virginia. The justices voted unanimously to strike down Virginia's law, declaring that the "fundamental freedom" of marriage could not be shorten on account of race. The opinion rendered by Chief Justice Earl Warren read: "The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men." With the court's ruling, similar laws in fifteen other states eventually would fall. Ending illegal interracial

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The Loving v. Virginia cases began when two residents of Virginia, Mildred Jeter who is a black African American woman and Richard Loving, a white man. They went to the District of Columbia and get married. When they returned to Virginia shortly after their marriage. The State found them guilty and they were charged with violating the state's law does not allow interracial marriages. Richard Loving and his wife were found guilty and even sentenced to a year in…

    • 80 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The moral reason of Loving v. Virginia case at the time period was under the Anti-miscegenation law of Virginia. African Americans were not allowed to cohabitate with whites regarding interracial marriages. Constitutionally, in reference to interracial marriages, the petitioner loving claimed equal protection under the law. As part of the Fourteenth Amendment the equal protection clause referred to the anti-miscegenation law of Virginia unconstitutional which discriminated Loving and his wife based upon their race. However, the anti-miscegenation law equally punished both whiter and Negroes population as a result to the equal protection clause which did not constitute invidious discrimination based upon race.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Windsor decided to bring this dispute to court, as she believed the way she was treated was unconstitutional and she had the right to be treated equally because of the legal laws in New York State. After passing through the New York State District Court and the Appeals Court, the courts recognized that by not considering Windsor, Spyer’s spouse, it was unconstitutional and did in fact violate the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection to those who are legally married under the laws of their state. However, the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group believed that since homosexuals were never a protected class in United States history, traditional marriage is the only marriage that should be considered legal. As the opposing view of the courts, they believed that same sex marriage laws should undergo negligible scrutiny under a rational basis test and the DOMA was created as an attempt to avoid the centralized meaning of marriage from shifting over time. Following the ruling that the DOMA was unconstitutional in the previous two court cases, The Supreme Court had jurisdiction to hear the court case, and because of such a tangible incongruity between the opposing sides, the Supreme Court decided to hear the…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Section 20-109

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Accordingly, the Bostic decision became good law and Virginia began issuing marriage licenses to homosexual couples. So, if Virginia law views marriage as including gay marriages, then the language in Section 20-109 that cohabitation “be analogous to a marriage” must necessarily include same-sex cohabitation. Nevertheless, the Virginia Court of Appeals chose to ignore this fact even though Bostic v. Schaefer had been decided prior to the decision in Luttrell v.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marriage now can be between a man and woman or between same-sex people. Loving v. Virginia wasn’t the only case that influenced the ruling of this case; other cases like Lawrence v. Texas, which made same-sex sexual activity in every state legal also affected this case. In the future, knowing that cases from the past can affect current ones can change the way judge’s rule in a…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Obergefell vs Hodges June 26, 2015. The United States Supreme Court finalized the case known as Obergefell vs Hodges. The case involved a decades long battle between states and people on weather or not gay marriage should be legalized. Same-sex couples, and other advocates of same-sex marriage sued their state marriage agencies in Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee on weather or not their right to refuse same-sex marriage was violating the 14th Amendment, which addresses many parts of the right of US Citizens. [ Obergefell v. Hodges.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of Loving v. Virginia is a landmark civil rights decision of the United States Supreme Court, which invalidated laws prohibiting interracial marriage. It was decided on June 12th, 1967 where the the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously struck down Virginia's law prohibiting interracial marriages as a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. (Virginia 1967) What surprises me about this case is when the Lovings went to trial, that they first plead not guilty, when they were clearly guilty. This didn’t make sense to me because why would they plead not guilty when they were clearly lovers which makes them guilty.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Civil Rights

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In 1967, (while many states tried to outlaw interracial marriage), the Loving v. Virginia Supreme Court case stated that these laws (outlawing interracial marriage) were unconstitutional. An interracial couple was ordained in a state that allowed interracial marriage, but when they moved to Virginia (a state that did not allow interracial marriage), the couple was charged with disobeying Virginia Law. Finally, the courts declared the bans unconstitutional and stated that marriage was a basic civil right of man, and it was essential to our…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Loving Vs Virginia Essay

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When they got back to their town their town sheriff asked Richard why a black woman was living with him. He replied that she was his wife. They immediately were arrested for breaking the Racial Integrity Act of 1924. They went to court and they then were plead guilty and were to serve one year in jail. However the judge sentenced them to leave the state for 25 years.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There have been several times within American politics where the rights of groups of people have been fought over. These types of fights have been spread over the course of America’s history the most well known being the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s. One of the most recent of these fights was the repeal of California’s Proposition 8, originally titled the “California Marriage Protection Act,” which only affected same-sex couples. Proposition 8 was a proposal for an amendment addition to the California constitution stating “only marriage between a man and a women is valid or recognized in California,” creating controversy between groups. The California Supreme Court saw that “limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples,” was violating…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virginia case is significant to the racial segregation laws because it declared the Virginia miscegenation law unconstitutional. It combined the past arguments presented in other cases, bringing attention to the case, leading the Supreme Court to hear the appeal. The court was no longer accepted the idea of past racial ideologies, “they accepted the divisions between culture and biology and culture and race” (Pascoe, 1996, p. 25). This court case truly showed the distance traveled to the twentieth-century American court. It was the Loving v. Virginia which cause the Supreme court to realize that the miscegenation laws were clearly meant to maintain White supremacy.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    14th Amendment Equality

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages

    After a few years, they wanted to return back home, but were not allowed. The couple filed a petition against their charges. The Lovings argued that the case did not obey the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause (Legal Information Institute). The Supreme Court of Virginia said that since the law was equal for both races, whites couldn’t marry blacks and blacks could not marry whites, the law did not go…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On May 21, 2012, the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People), named same-sex marriage as "one of the key civil rights struggles of our time.” Gay marriage has been proven to be a civil right. It’s been a struggle for those that support it and those who are against it but, there is a solution to this situation and that solution is allowing same sex couples to get married. People of the same sex should be able to get married all around the U.S. because it is a civil right, it brings in a greater financial gain for the federal, state, and local government, and embraces liberty and equality for all.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedman begins her piece with a recount of a historical event that saw the legalisation of inter-racial marriage, an issue that we today in 2015 would think should have never been illegal. When she tells us the story of Richard and Mildred Loving and how their marriage was thought to…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Same-sex marriage, conflict of laws, and the unconstitutional public policy exception. Yale Law Journal. May 1997, v.106, n7, 1965-2008 Strasser, Mark. Legally Wed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1997.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays