Capote uses a lot of this to get the point of sympathy across for the murders. Pathos all comes down to if it was effective enough to help the reader connect with the text. If pathos was not used correctly, the audience won't feel an emotional connection to the text. Capote has problem pursuing this feeling. Another thing that relates to pathos is ethos. Ethos comes along with pathos to make the argument stronger, but they aren't always used together in writing. Ethos is the credibility that the author has. Is Truman Capote trustworthy to be taking this information from on this “true” event. Capote was involved with the Clutters case. He chose this case to do research on and right a book about. In fact, the author of this book went to the scene and the town to get a closer emotional connect to the story that he was beginning to write. If Capote went though all of this to write a book, then the audience will have feelings towards the murders if they do their research on how this book came …show more content…
There is three kinds of irony in literature but the one used more religiously in this book is situational irony. Situational irony is where actions or events have the opposite result from what is expected or what is intended. Capote starts off the book exampling the town that they are in and how the people in the town are, essentially, he is explaining how such a peaceful town Holcomb is and crime free it was thought to be. Although everyone had this idea, it wasn't actually what happened. No one expected the murders of the clutters to happen, but it did. That is what makes situational irony so important in creating the feeling of sympathy towards the murders. He explains the murders in such a way that is jaw dropping to the