Response To Vonnegut Analysis

Improved Essays
Response to Vonnegut Vonnegut is one of the most distinguished authors of the 20th century. He was born nearly a century ago, and has been making waves since. However not everything he says is true even if it is beautifully put. Vonnegut says it's okay to not achieve awesome life goals, and that is wrong. You only get one shot at life and if you miss or worse don’t even shoot; you missed the target and maybe the game as well. Vonnegut in his speech says roughly that the most important thing when your life is over, is what your neighbors think of you. Not speaking for myself but most people these days don’t care about their neighbors. In modern terms this would be like saying your life is only good if you get the most retweets on twitter. …show more content…
We wish for greatness and thanks to capitalism and our fore fathers we can achieve whatever we want instead of some low standards for menial pay and the betterment of communities. The new generation wants their slice of the pie and not a picture of it and some crumbs.

Vonnegut was a man who had fame, and money, and recognition for his work. These are all things he says we shouldn’t chase for in life. If he had followed his own advice he wouldn’t have any published works. If he wouldn’t have published those works he wouldn’t have nearly as much money and therefore wouldn’t have the security of comfort that comes from little financial worries. With his money came fame and recognition and along came more affluent people in his life. He talks about getting invited to a private party hosted by a billionaire. Life is tough for this guy. Kurt vonnegut may have been a brilliant guy when it came to writing books, however he was clearly living a pretty posh life with little struggle with what a young adult would be going through in their lives. He cared too much about what others thought of him. Seemingly out of touch when you properly looked at and is telling others to live a somewhat, meaningless life. He himself applies to none of the life advice he gave and to me, that seems just

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Vonnegut shows that the outcome of not having individual characteristics can be disastrous as America becomes a land of stupid, slow people and the government officials murder the smart people who try to act above the equal people and equality is achieved, but at the cost of freedom…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout history, man has shown a great tendency to gravitate towards decisions that end in destruction, especially if the destruction will not directly affect himself. Occurences such as war declarations do not necessarily have to be decided on by the masses, but only a single man’s will. By that man’s will, millions of innocent lives can be lost, his own usually not included. Kurt Vonnegut is a fantastic author that uses satire in order to draw attention and ridicule the flaws of mankind, most of which end in destruction and chaos of some sort. In two of his novels, Cat’s Cradle and Slaughterhouse-Five, damage and destruction of millions is determined by what can potentially be a single man’s decision.…

    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Tension In Cat's Cradle

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages

    See the cradle” (Vonnegut, 1963, pg 126). Vonnegut said, “people are not wholly bad. People are not wholly good, either. Try not to create characters in terms that are absolute – real people aren’t like that” (Shields, 2011, pg 277). People are careless, sometimes indifferent, often stupid, and ultimately caught up in their own lives.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carr and Vonnegut have similar tones when addressing their arguments. To an extent, both authors use a sense of urgency or awareness in their writing. By using this method, they instill the issue more in the reader’s mind. Carr throughout his article continuously talks about the issue at hand with technology and by doing so he gradually wants the reader to take action through examples. For instance, Carr states the problem and consequently he states a solution for the overreliance in technology.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He was a man who was all about himself and didn't care about other people's purpose besides his. All he cared about was getting money and…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alain De Botton Humorists

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kurt Vonnegut, a remarkably successful American satirist, used humor to communicate his feelings about society and the world as a whole. He wrote novels that covered controversial topics such as religion, war, sex, and the meaning of life, while never wavering in his devotion to a uniquely charming and irreverent sense of humor. His work inspired a generation of authors and artists to create more emotionally complete work, and he provided his readers with a sense of understanding. Vonnegut represented a pleasantly dazed modern sensibility that was unlike anything that came before him, and because of his humorous style he was able to create whatever he…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I feel like the point of the author is trying to get our attentions that we sacrifice our life just for those fancy and new items, yet we never fulfill. What is more important than our own…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kurt Vonnegut, in his novel, “Slaughterhouse Five” recounts his experiences of World War II through Billy Pilgrim, the main character. Vonnegut’s purpose is to describe his wartime experiences and antiwar view. He adopts a complex and elusive tone in order to successfully engage and entertain his readers. Vonnegut begins his novel in the first person. We are given a first-person point of view in the sections embedded in the first and last chapters of the book.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was better looking than anybody else. Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else...(Vonnegut)”. Clearly, with the quote, we can identify that the society is dystopian and it's freedom rights are limited. The author's theme in this that if we follow the path and argue over equality, we may end…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kurt Vonnegut’s Reading, Boredom, Belonging, and Our Human Responsibility speech at Fredonia College reminds me of my pastor’s sermons, however without a religious aspect. Vonnegut advises this graduating class on how to be good people and lead good lives. The tone of this essay is patronizing, as it is expected for graduation speakers to be wise and impart wisdom into the new generation. This is why most graduation speeches are timeless, such as “This is Water” by David Foster Wallace. He begins the speech with a silly and seemingly dull piece of advice that he uses to start deeper discussion: “I suppose you will all want money and true love, among other things.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Harrison Bergeron, Vonnegut seems to warn individuals about the dangers of becoming like those characters who seem so far from reality; however, the control of government to preserve equality and politically correct self-esteem often stifles an individual’s creativity which further creates identity struggles as people attempt to balance their need to be a part of a community with their need to be self-aware. In both HB and Today’s society, people would find out that the government is controlling how they live and outweighing the desire of themselves. In other words, the government knows they got it under control. As in the story of HB, “All this equality was due to the 211th, 212th, and 213th Amendments to the Constitution, and to the unceasing…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Harrison Bergeron

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In conclusion the society in Vonnegut’s short story is looking at equality all wrong by creating everyone equal by taking away all their talents and thoughts. It also takes away everyone’s talents, their ability to have an opinion to share and their freedom of speech and does not embrace people's differences. This proves that that method of achieving total equality is not worth having to handicap and oppress the people of…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    What’s got Billy so Spooked? Kurt Vonnegut. American World War Two survivor and famous author published Slaughterhouse-Five in 1969, 24 years after his experiences in World War Two. More specifically, his time as a prisoner of war (POW) and his survival of the Dresden bombing. The protagonist of this sci-fi anti-war novel, Billy Pilgrim, went through similar events as his auth0r however dealt with them much differently.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All of us have opinions from whether we like our coffee hot or iced to who we want to be president. We often try to persuade others that our opinions are superior to theirs. But how far would you go to convince someone that your opinion is the right one to have? Would you burn someone’s opinion in a furnace? That is what Charles McCarthy did to a book that he did not want students in his school district to be reading.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    “So it goes.” These three words convey the fatalistic mindset of Kurt Vonnegut through the voice of Billy Pilgrim, the protagonist of Vonnegut’s novel, Slaughterhouse Five. The strength of Vonnegut’s novel lies in his own personal experiences, as he himself was an American prisoner of war, was captured in Germany, and then was transferred to the city of Dresden. Throughout the novel, Billy Pilgrim suffers flashbacks of the horrors of war, specifically those associated with the bombing of Dresden. By narrating the novel through the voice of Billy, Vonnegut conveys his belief that war is absurd, exemplified by the causes and effects of the firebombing of Dresden.…

    • 1984 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays