Religion Should Not Be Taught In Public Schools

In Why Religion Should Not Be Taught in Public Schools, Harold Editor claims that world religion has no room to be taught in a public school. Perhaps the strongest idea that Editor presents for this statement relies strongly on the claim that by teaching religion in a school, it will cause too many disagreements, consequently leading to unnecessary arguments among students. He supports this by saying “the more one teaches about religion, the more people will argue about what is true and what is not true.” This accusation is reasonable in the sense that students should not have to deal with the possibility of having to protect their own particular faith, since people tend to act out a certain religion in their own way. Every religion is not set in stone and not every person is going to follow a definite path, but school is not the place for a student to be having this type of dispute regardless. Next, Editor goes on to claim that it is truly impossible for a teacher to fully comprehend every single religion that is present in the world today. This declaration is plausible because instructors may leave out particular parts of a religion, or they …show more content…
To begin, religion plays an extremely important part in our history, literature andcurrent events. Disagreement among religious communities and the rise of religious fundamentalisms has aggravated an outburst of ethnic-religious conflicts all over the world, especially in Eastern Europe, South Asia, the Middle East and Africa, in the recent years. We study art, literature and music in school because we acknowledge these as key foundations in human culture, yet religion, which has had a considerable impact, is left out. Specifically learning about religion is rather essential for grasping an understanding of the world’s history and its multiple cultures, while having a sense of basic awareness of what is occurring in our world