The Westphalian states system of sovereignty is the main difference concerning the relational model’s use of a zone system (Holmes-284). The concept of zones used by the relational model doesn’t outline any definitive borders like with the Westphalian sovereignty, but focuses on spheres of influence (Homes-276). The relational model also focuses more on national interest when it comes to intervention in global politics instead of honoring each state or entity as being equal like the Westphalian system (Holmes-284-285). The use of heterarchy for the relational model verses hierarchy in the Westphalian model also outlines the differences between the two states systems with heterarchy being more flexible to change while hierarchy is a solid ranked system (Holmes-302). The strengths of the relational model of diplomacy is that it is more open to non-state actors with a heterarchy system, and it’s constantly evolving to change with the flow of the international community (Holmes-284-285). The weaknesses of the model is that there is a lack of coordination and consistency in the behavior of states with this model of diplomacy, and can cause for varying
The Westphalian states system of sovereignty is the main difference concerning the relational model’s use of a zone system (Holmes-284). The concept of zones used by the relational model doesn’t outline any definitive borders like with the Westphalian sovereignty, but focuses on spheres of influence (Homes-276). The relational model also focuses more on national interest when it comes to intervention in global politics instead of honoring each state or entity as being equal like the Westphalian system (Holmes-284-285). The use of heterarchy for the relational model verses hierarchy in the Westphalian model also outlines the differences between the two states systems with heterarchy being more flexible to change while hierarchy is a solid ranked system (Holmes-302). The strengths of the relational model of diplomacy is that it is more open to non-state actors with a heterarchy system, and it’s constantly evolving to change with the flow of the international community (Holmes-284-285). The weaknesses of the model is that there is a lack of coordination and consistency in the behavior of states with this model of diplomacy, and can cause for varying