Summary Of John Rawls's Liberal Contractarianism

Great Essays
As students in this course we were exposed to Peter Wenzs’ thoughts on many political and moral theories. These theories provided us with different ideas on how to best run a society both morally and effectively. The problem some of these theories come across is that while they sound very appealing, they can prove to be dysfunctional when actually applied. Wenz provides the readers with comparisons between the different theories so the reader can form their own opinion. I believe that Rawls’s liberal contractarianism is the theory which allows the greatest benefit to society with the least amount of flaws.

John Rawls’ view was culmination of concepts, assumptions and history of the social contract tradition. This tradition is founded on the
…show more content…
Rawls believes, “Imagination is the key”. This I find is the most interesting part of his theory because it causes a person to re-evaluate their current system and think of possible improvements. Rawls wants everyone to view the world under a veil of ignorance in order to create a more just society. In this veil of ignorance, no one would have any information regarding the individual. The only things a person knows under the veil of ignorance is that they are there to decide the principles of justice should govern their state and basic concepts of politics and human nature. This original position is where Rawls would like a person to imagine themselves in. Since they know nothing about the individual they are, they cannot have any prejudice against another. This is important because it gets rid of the self-interest conflict of a state contract. No person in the original position is going to approve of laws that allow one party to take advantage of another party because they might be the one that gets taken advantage of. This forces the observers to really think about the society they would want to be born into. A society that has great schools that provide great education, great hospitals that are all equal, access to housing, an open political system, and so on would be the goal of the average person. This is not what society is actually like though. This veil of ignorance allows a …show more content…
He answers this question with his two principles of justice, which allows the rich only to get richer if it benefits the poor. This allows for a just society when people are put behind a veil of ignorance. John Rawls though experiment really made the individual look at what they would like in society for everyone if they could be everyone. From looking at main concepts of Rawls’s theory I can very firmly state that this was the most interesting theory to me as it addressed what I think is the most important issue of our time. I find that my only issue is the distinction of different inequalities. Rawl’s theory allows the greatest benefit to society by striving for justice and trying help the worse off to bring all of society

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Now that the objection of self-interest has been refuted, the emphasis needs to shift towards an explanation of Rawls second principle of justice. The second principle, commonly referred to as the “Difference Principle,” indicates that, “[S]ocial and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both (a) reasonably expected to be to everyone’s advantage, and (b) attached to positions and offices open to all.” Rawls specifies that the “Liberty Principle” is “lexicographical”. This means that the principles are hierarchically ordered where the first principle must be satisfied before the second can even be considered.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rawls looks at what the proper role of government should be and he begins with the idea that there are primary goods, which include both material goods and goods of rights or opportunities. It is societies job to figure out how to help us cooperate to distribute those goods in a just way. Rawls does not claim that those goods must be distributed equally, unlike Marx, Rawls is advocating for a welfare state not a communist state. Rawls separates the distribution of material goods and rights, and determines that there are certain rights that must be…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main distinguishing component of the original positions the veil of ignorance. Rawls’ suggests us to imagine ourselves having no idea about who we are and where we stand in society. By being ignorant to our circumstances we can decide what will benefit our society without any bias…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This principle dealt with people’s liberty. These liberties were entitled to everyone and always remained. He believed basic liberties can be limited but, that only meant for the sake of liberty. To avoid harming the liberties of others. Rawls, second principle states “social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so . . .…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mass incarceration also creates a social hierarchy with Blacks being at the bottom because of being labeled a drug addict/user and a criminal, which in Rawls’ perspective is an injustice because its placing certain individuals higher than others. Rawls would view the situation the same as he viewed distribution of wealth and income, except the moral inquiry would now be the distribution of a negative good which would be punishment among individuals pertaining particularly to certain racial groups. Therefore, if Rawls proposed a solution, it would be that although there would still be some type of punishment institution to house those who are a severe threat to the community in order to protect society, we would choose arrangements that would respect the humanity of each individual. Also he would also examine the “social division of responsibility” between society and individuals. For example when we are about to arrest or convict an individual for possessing or deal drugs, one must also consider everything to ensure that each individual continues to face a decent opportunity for a good life.…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although his critique of mass incarceration maybe harsh under several of his principles the problem can be fixed. Rawls suggestion is that you imagine yourself in an original position in society under a veil of ignorance. Being behind the veil means that you do not know anything about yourself and your natural abilities. You also are unaware of your race, sex, nationality, and talents. In other words, you are being born into the world blind to everything.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    5 To set a common standard viewpoint by which to judge the various means of allocating what Rawls calls primary goods, such as rights, powers, opportunities, income, wealth, and the bases for self-respect, he postulates a "veil of ignorance" that assumes that one's position and situation in life is not known. " "To ensure the values of a constitutional democracy, which Rawls feel is the best kind of government since it allows for pluralism as well as stability, a constitutional consensus must be achieved through equal rights, a public disclosure on political matters, and a willingness to…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So, the first principle of Rawls - is essentially the principle of freedom. Basic freedoms are 1) political freedom (the principle of "equal participation" in the political process defined by the constitution), 2) the rule of law, or legal state 3) freedom of conscience. The second principle of justice of Rawls is formulated as follows that social and economic inequalities are to be settled in such a way as to lead to the greatest benefit of the least successful and that positions in society has to be open to all, with the subject of compliance with fair equal opportunity. Principles of justice Rawls relies on a strategy known in game theory as a "maximin" and implies the maximization of the minimum result. Thus, according to Rawls, the person in the original position inevitably chooses a society in which the least successful will be in the best possible position.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his work, Theory of Justice, John Rawls describes two principles in which he describes his theory for distributive justice. Rawls interprets the goods described in distributive justice as the power and wealth that stem from institutional positions. The first principle asserts that, “each individual has an equal right to the most extensive liberty compatible with like liberty for all”. (503)…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As I stated above, Rawls indicated that everyone be given equal rights no matter the circumstances. He also implied, that the disadvantage should be given a chance to improve, and I couldn’t agree more. If people aren’t given a chance how are they supposed to improve in…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Witnessed poverty when he was little John Rawls Philosophy- John Rawls believed believes that a justice system of distribution should be based on considerations of equality rights and principles of fairness. Things as they are now are patently unfair- Unfairness in our society, It's hard to believe in unfairness because everyone tells us if we work hard and put in the effort we can make anything happen if we try.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    1) In examining Rawl’s theory of justice, and the supposed “original-position” which Rawls takes to be the starting point for its conception, the question becomes: “who” amongst all the diversity of human beings in the world exists in that position? Who, in other words, is ever truly at the place to begin a discourse on justice, as applies to all human beings? And in considering the contrary view of Mills to that original position—who gets left out? Who is denied access to the talking circles which enframe a notion of social justice ‘for all’?…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Rawls in his book Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (2001) characterizes how idealized reasoners, reason in order to validate the two “principles of justice” (42) in a “basic structure” (10) leading to a “well-ordered society” (8). The idealized reasoners do some kind of calculation. With the “original position” (14) and the “veil of ignorance” (15) idealized reasoners can understand the “difference principle” (61). This is an important element of creating a well-ordered society. Mills finds issue with how Rawls uses this ideal as something we should follow.…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While I believe such a system would help harness the power of human love over greed, I think Rawls’ theories of justice fall short of articulating the importance of actively cultivating an understanding of the importance of solidarity. Some might say that although we have a natural disposition to caring for people who are close of kin, our natural inclination to self-preservation might supersede our ability to care for individuals who are strange to us. This objection might prove true under certain circumstances; however, I believe that a profound concern for the prosperity of strangers can indeed be achieved through an intellectual exploration of what it means to be human – to exercise our ability to love beyond our self-interest. Education plays a key role in cultivating this type of solidarity, which leads me to conclude that education should be among the list of basic human…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    A second objection to Nozicks theory comes from Will Kymlicka, in his book Contemporary Political Philosophy3. He discusses Nozicks example of Wilt Chamberlain, a famous basketballer. The example is put forward that every time people come to see him play, they donate an extra 25 cents which goes directly to Wilt Chamberlain. At the end of the season, if one million people have attended his home games, he could end up with $250,000 extra income. Nozick believes that is entirely peoples choice as to how they choose to redistribute their wealth.…

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays