John Rawls: Personal Views Of Social Justice

Decent Essays
¬Diana Paredes
10/09/2015
SW 500D

Personal Views of Social Justice My conception of social justice is founded on the belief that humans are interdependent social creatures whose individual prosperity is dependent on solidarity. As conscientious social beings that depend on one another to survive, we have the unique ability to love and to manifest our love for one another through the exercise of moral values which reinforce our accountability to one another. Injustice arises when we act against the wellbeing of our counterparts either out of pleasure, or in order to promote our individual self-interest. Therefore, I believe that a just society is one that acknowledges the inextricable role collective prosperity has on individual prosperity,
…show more content…
While I believe such a system would help harness the power of human love over greed, I think Rawls’ theories of justice fall short of articulating the importance of actively cultivating an understanding of the importance of solidarity. Some might say that although we have a natural disposition to caring for people who are close of kin, our natural inclination to self-preservation might supersede our ability to care for individuals who are strange to us. This objection might prove true under certain circumstances; however, I believe that a profound concern for the prosperity of strangers can indeed be achieved through an intellectual exploration of what it means to be human – to exercise our ability to love beyond our self-interest. Education plays a key role in cultivating this type of solidarity, which leads me to conclude that education should be among the list of basic human …show more content…
This group was comprised of immigrants of different legal statuses and U.S. citizens who voluntarily waged a campaign against the unjust deportation of undocumented immigrants. Our movement was founded on the idea that the deportation of one individual was an affront to our shared right to dignity and self-determination. In order to stop deportations, we leveraged our collective power through the use of social media, advocacy, and even our bodies to impede the systemic deportation of historically disenfranchised people of color, one deportation case at a time. In addition to these anti- operations, our group engaged in active discourse to analyze the individualistic Neoliberal policies which had given rise to the private prisons and deportation quotas that violated our collective rights. This collective analysis of the source of our experienced injustice, and the compounding effect that apathy towards single deportation cases had in condoning this injustice compelled us to look beyond our individual needs and to give up our time and resources to care for

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Many philosophical scholars believe that justice, liberty, law, and equality are an important aspect among the commonwealth of the nation. Moreover, this paper will focus on the two important political philosophers that argue with the notion and importance of equality and justice in the western society. These philosophers include: Robert Nozick and John Rawls. John Rawls claims that equality and justice is derived from an equal distribution of opportunities, income, wealth, for the general social advantage of the citizen, which includes welfare. Whereas, Robert Nozick defines equality and justice as an entailment to oneself.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The principle of the justice model works closely with ideal of fairness,…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elmer Chavarria illegally entered the US from Guatemala almost 20 years in hopes of escaping the violence in his hometown. In 2007 he married a US citizen, Cyndi, and together had a daughter. Unexpectedly, Elmer was assaulted and injured by police during a routine call in his Grand Rapids, Michigan home. After his release Elmer was advised to pursue immediate surgery for two herniated disks pinching his spinal cord which caused him severe back pain and numbness on his lower body. Before his surgery, U.S Immigration and Customs Enforcement intervened and placed him at the Calhoun County Correction Center despite his medical condition.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Only a hypothetical contract such as such as a this, carried an original position in equality, would procedure principles of justice untiered by difference of bargaining power of knowledge.” (Reader page 203) This means if we're in an imaginary society where laws and social structure has been made, it is our job to make it as just as possible. His first principle of justice is that everyone is entitled to basic liberties. The second is the difference principle, which is meant to show there can be inequality within society if it can help those who are disadvantaged.…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Once we recognise the dependence of human beings on society, then our obligation to sustain the common good of society are…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The important factor to having a society where all people are equal is to acknowledge that equality does not mean that everyone is the same. “Each of us is different in our own special way but we also have the common qualities that make us all humans. So each of us should be treated with respect and dignity and treat others in the same way” (Voices of Youth). Nobody should be discriminated against based on their characteristics or personal…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Helen Keller was once quoted as saying “Alone we can do so little; together we can do so much.” From early on in the United States of America’s history, citizens again and again have demonstrated that as a group, they have the power to change the course of history. The American Civil Rights Movement was no exception. It was one of the first steps to true equality and a show of how powerful of an effect non-violence can have on a country. Although many African-Americans, or Negros as they were called at the time, stood up, few took the spotlight and led the movement such as Congressman John Lewis, or William Hampton, a lawyer and representative of NAACP.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It can also be linked to the concept of ‘equality of opportunity’ which is discussed later on in the chapter and claims that every individual has the same equal treatment which is based on the ‘common good’ rather than someone’s interest (Hobhouse,1911:130). The author makes a strong argument here as he claims that inequality is possible in the society as the distribution of wealth or power is spread in a way to “do better for the good of all” (Hobhouse,1911:131). Therefore, individuals have to acknowledge the fact that someone might be better off and this would lead to progress of the…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Karl Marx, John Rawls, and Robert Nozick are three prominent philosophers whose political theories have an important place in the modern political debate about the role of the state, how society should be structured and the concept of justice. Karl Marx was born 1818, his major work was The Communist Manifesto published in 1848. Marx advocated for a type of socialism called communism where the dominant goals are the abolition of private property and class antagonisms through a revolution of the proletariat or working class. John Rawls was born in 1921, his major work was A Theory of Justice published in 1971. Rawl’s defended social liberalism, egalitarianism, and the welfare state in the form of distributive justice.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his work, Theory of Justice, John Rawls describes two principles in which he describes his theory for distributive justice. Rawls interprets the goods described in distributive justice as the power and wealth that stem from institutional positions. The first principle asserts that, “each individual has an equal right to the most extensive liberty compatible with like liberty for all”. (503)…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The so-called fair, all people are made of and considered to be a fair thing to make quality, and because of this quality that people want to conduct fair and equitable thing to do. Aristotle believed that in a variety of virtues, the only justice is concerned with the good of others, for the sake of others to benefit, not a part of the virtue of justice, but the whole of virtue. Justice is a virtue, because it does not to force people to do things, but to maintain those people who need help to go to, so they no longer suffer oppression and bondage, let them be…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Rawls in his book Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (2001) characterizes how idealized reasoners, reason in order to validate the two “principles of justice” (42) in a “basic structure” (10) leading to a “well-ordered society” (8). The idealized reasoners do some kind of calculation. With the “original position” (14) and the “veil of ignorance” (15) idealized reasoners can understand the “difference principle” (61). This is an important element of creating a well-ordered society. Mills finds issue with how Rawls uses this ideal as something we should follow.…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Rawls theory of social justice developed over time with the publishing of various books he wrote, such as A Theory of Justice and Political Liberalism. In A Theory of Justice, he determines the “Circumstances of Justice.” These circumstances assume justice applies to a “definite geographical territory and that the subjects of justice are “roughly similar in…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Rawls Thought Model

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this essay, I will detail the thought experiment of John Rawls known as “the original position,” the two principles of justice he believes this thought experiment results in, and, lastly, consider one objection to his claims. I argue that Rawls’ thought experiment offers a decent starting point to consider matters of justice and/or good and bad in society, but becomes compromised when we are asked to presume members behind the “veil of ignorance” do not know their conceptions of good. In A Theory of Justice, John Rawls considers the role of justice in society and posits a simple conception of just society. In Rawls’ view, justice depends upon a “scheme of cooperation” that enables all in society to achieve an agreeable existence, or the…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout the piece, “justice as fairness” serves as the basis for the liberal approach to citizenship: Justice as fairness is intended as a political conception of justice. While a political conception of justice is, of course a moral conception… justice as fairness framed to apply to what I have called the ‘basic structure’ of a modern constitutional democracy. By this structure I mean such a society’s main political, social, and economic institutions, and how they fit together into one unified system of social cooperation. In other words, Rawls believes that a democracy will most efficiently function when each citizen develops their own moral conception of justice and go on to agreeably pursue these conceptions through diverse plans of action.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays