Rational Choice Theory Apply To Juveniles

Decent Essays
The main assumption of rational choice theory are that individuals have free will to make their own choices in life. This includes delinquent behavior as well as status offenses committed by juveniles. I believe that rational choice theory should not apply to juveniles due to the fact that their brains are not fully developed. This along with any mental issues can lead to poor decision making. It is safe to say that children cannot logically process information as some adults do. According to https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=185183 “People are influenced by their fear of criminal penalties associated with being caught and convicted for law violations. Choice theories are predicated on the view that the more severe, certain,

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Rational Choice is also known as choice theory or rational action theory, is a framework for understanding and often formally modeling social and economic behavior. The hoodlums breaking into the apartment was weigh out and had benefits. So the hoodlums made a choice to do the criminal act. They ransack the apartment for jewelry, money and anything of value to possible get a thrill of committing the…

    • 68 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminologists who believe in this theory also state that perceived violation benefits outweighs the punishment of committing a crime for a criminal. The theory implies that an increment of punishment severity would lower crime rate(Causes of Crime-ODU).Two subcategories of Choice Theory are Rational Choice Theory and Routine Activity Theory. Rational Choice Theory is the idea that societal behaviour patterns reflect individual choices and the pros and cons of their actions(Causes of Crime-ODU). Whereas Routine Activity Theory focuses on the likelihood of crimes occurring in certain situations(Causes of Crime-ODU). For example, you are more likely to be robbed on the streets than in a locked…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Generally, those who believe they are likely to be caught and punished will be less likely to commit a criminal act” (Klepper and Nagin, 1989). Ethical boundaries that are linked with the actions and behaviour of people often come into play…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the modern legal system, most jurisdictions view a person as an adult at 18 years of age. Until a person reaches this age, they are less likely to receive the full extent of a jurisdiction’s legal system. At certain parts in a child’s life, age can be used as a valid defense. If a person is under 7 years of age, they will not be charged in most jurisdictions. From the age of 7 to the age of responsibility, which is usually recognized as 16 but varies by jurisdiction, an offender can be tried in the juvenile system (criminal Law Today).…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Over time the juvenile justice system has developed and kids have started to be treated as such. It has been proven the adolescent brains are not fully developed and is the cause for their criminal activities. But…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Theory Of Rational Choice

    • 1707 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The theory of Rational Choice emerged during the year 1200-1400 from Italian criminologist, jurist, philosopher, and politician Cesare Beccaria. The theory of Rational Choice assumes that all criminals and crimes are rationalize when they are committed. It states that people choose to commit crimes after weighing the costs and benefits such as the consequences of their actions; whether their choice brings them pleasure and reduce pain. (Akers L.) For example, in recent U.S. history, James Holmes, the Aurora theater massacre shooter portrays actions that exemplifies rational thought to commit the crime which left 12 dead and injured 70 others on July 20, 2012.…

    • 1707 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Juvenile crime has been an increasing point of debate in recent years. Many people argued whether they should be sentenced as adults or not when convicted of a serious crime, such as murder. Some argue that juveniles deserve to be treated as such despite the crime they have committed, while others believe they are to be treated as adults. This resulted in many juveniles receiving adult sentences like life in prison without parole. Some juveniles commit crimes without a thought of the risks, while some carefully plan out their crimes and get a serious thrill out of it.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gottfredson and Hirschi also integrated elements of rational choice theory into the development of their theory (John Liederbach). If criminals opportunity presents itself to an individual with low self control then crime is likely to…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The problem with rationalization is that it tends to be exaggerated. However, these young people do not always do things for a reason. For example, a child might have a friend that keeps getting into trouble. He might feel bad for that other child and want to take the blame for something he did. He doesn’t have to have a reason to make such a sacrifice for his friend, and inevitably he will reap the consequences.…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Sentencing Hypocritical

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sentencing a juvenile life in prison without parole is depriving them of their rights and is clearly hypocritical. The minority who are pro sentencing them to life without parole don't take into consideration the possibility there is in enlightening these kids in becoming better citizens and learning from their mistakes. The reason why I consider the sentencing hypocritical is due to the way society treats juveniles and classifies them as “kids” until they commit a crime. I am in full agreement with the majority of Supreme Court ruling of abolishing mandatory life in prison for juveniles who commit murder. Many who oppose my vision on the topic, use claims such as, “they’re old enough to know better” or “a crime is a crime no matter age,” but…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On June 25,2012 The supreme court ruled that Juveniles who committed murder should be sentences as an adult. On the other hand many adults believe that Juveniles brains aren't fully developed. therefore, They should not be charged as an adult because they’re kids. In my opinion I believe that they should be charged as adults. Some of my claims are that teenagers have brain issues, matureness and violence to their families.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Age doesn't define whether or not you've become an adult it's the maturity that defines whether you have reached the certain point in your life where you are capable of knowing the difference between right and wrong. Sooner or later, but some happen to do so quicker. When a person turns eighteen you have the opportunity to do certain things, such as no longer having a curfew, being able to purchase alcohol ,and also voting rights, meaning that you are completely responsible for the actions you take. Looking at different cases where adolescents have committed a crime they knew that they weren't going to get punished like adults, even though they knew what they were doing was wrong. Adolescents commit crimes as if they were adults, and aren't…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cities are shaken to their cores when juveniles commit horrible crimes and aren't given a fit punishment. One example is that when Jessica Ridgeway was murdered the killer was in charge of 18th birthday, therefore he was not charged as an adult. This is a controversial topic that many argue their point about. One reason that juveniles should be tried as adults is if they have Criminal Intent. Also just because you are younger than someone who commits the same crime does not mean you should get a different punishment for committing that crime.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In simple terms, rational choice theory is the view that crime is a function of a decision making process, in which the potential offender weighs the potential costs and benefits…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rational choice theory best explains why crime occurs. Hayward (2007) explains that this theory considers offenders to be rational individuals that plan their crimes. Offenders take into consideration the pain and pleasure he or she may have to deal with. The offender evaluates the risks before he or she decides to break the law.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays