Teenagers Should Be Charged As Adults

Improved Essays
On June 25,2012 The supreme court ruled that Juveniles who committed murder should be sentences as an adult. On the other hand many adults believe that Juveniles brains aren't fully developed. therefore, They should not be charged as an adult because they’re kids. In my opinion I believe that they should be charged as adults. Some of my claims are that teenagers have brain issues, matureness and violence to their families.

To begin with, In the article “on punishment and teen killers” by jennifer jenkins published by the juvenile justice information exchange on august 2,2011. she emphasizes that “If brain development were the reasons on punishment and teen killers…” For Example ,If that was the issue every teenager would be committing the same crimes. As a teenager you know what's right and wrong. They know all the consequences that it will lead to them but there understanding is that they can't be charged as an adult. Most teenagers take this advantage of it and keep committing the same crimes. There not just any crimes there are felonies.

In the article,”startling finds on teenage brains’, by paul Thompson mentions that”The Jurors, by returning a verdict of second degree murder instead of first degree. If you commit a crime you’re guilty until proven guilty. Thats a phrase Law enforcement is assigned to inform you.In every
…show more content…
For example, I wouldn't want a teenager male/female to stay in the hall for about a year for a murder they committed to a family member. Going on with that, it's not because there blood but because what they left behind. knowing that they're innocent and had nothing to do with the murder towards the suspect. What if you put it in there place they would love for the juvenile to be charged as an

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Consequently, they are more prone to risk taking and peer influence than adults; they think less about their future and express their emotions in more volatile ways. The juvenile system recognizes this distinct adolescent nature, and allows for recovery through developmentally appropriate programs, making young adults under eighteen better suited for the juvenile system rather than the adult system. However, when young law-breakers murder or rape someone, it is much more difficult call on whether they should be tried as adults or juveniles. The decision should be made on a case-by-case basis, depending on the severity, motive, and nature of the crimes. For example, a sixteen-year-old boy murdering his father to protect his sister warrants a different analysis than a case of a remorseless sixteen-year-old boy who murdered a mother and her two young children to steal a car.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article, “Juveniles Should Be Tried As Adults” by Mary Estudillo, brings up many strong arguments as to why juveniles should be tried as adults, but the opposing article, “Juveniles Should Not Be Tried As Adults” written by Hannah McCrea strongly claims they should not. Estudillo cites examples of cases in which juveniles committed first and second degree murder, and were thereafter tried as adults. She explains how juveniles should be tried as adults because they are criminals, and criminals need to held responsible for their actions. She also brings up how rehabilitation does little to sometimes nothing for the child, so when they are released, they commit another crime. Alternatively, McCrea authored “Juveniles Should Not Be Tried As Adults,” and states how adult prisons do more harm than good for juveniles.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Teens most likely commit crimes and get out of the consequences easily. Teens brains are fully developed Paul Thompson has described on his article “startling finds on teenage…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, juveniles don’t understand the risks of the crimes they commit because in quote it says that in america we raise them in a violence-loving culture. They don’t know what's the right or wrong if growing up they have teach them to be violent so they don’t understand the consequences they'll get. Also many of them don’t understand the consequences because their brain is not fully developed and they don’t know how to tell the right and bad things. Lastly many of them don’t think thoroughly when they commit crimes until they have done…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juveniles are not mentally capable to understand the crime they commit like an adult is, thus they should not be tried as an adult. A child, just like any living thing, goes through developmental stages. Throughout their growth periods, juveniles learn new skills and so do their brains. In a study, “Dr. Dorothy Otnow Lewis of New York University led comprehensive diagnostic evaluations of 14 juveniles on death row (at that time, 40 percent) in four states. She found that nine had major neuropsychological disorders and seven had psychotic disorders since early childhood” (Ortiz).…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Others may argue that it’s not right because there are laws that prohibit youngsters to complete certain actions like smoking, drinking, or going to R movies, these actions don’t seem to affect other it might affect them, however, once they commit a horrifying crime they are being tried as adults. In addition, Lundstrom argues that “Today we are witness to criminal defendants facing a life sentence without parole…” (Lundstrom, 10). Lundstrom continues by stating that juveniles cannot shave and still play with toys also they act scenes from their favorite T.V. shows. Further information that researchers have studies on teen brains with technology that maps the patterns of brain growth in children and teenagers, has given information that indicate that teenagers are having a massive loss of brain tissue this scientific evidence has also sparked the opponents, and argue that this evidence is why juveniles should not be facing life sentence in prison without parole.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Teens being tried as adults in my opinion needs to be expanded throughout the country. When teens think they are grown enough to murder,rob,or steal;they need to get grown folk charges. I’m not saying that all crimes need adult times,it should depend on the crime you did. If it was an intended murder by a teen then yes, I believe that they should get tried as an adult. Also if it is a major crime;for example,grand theft or stealing a car they shall also get tried as an adult.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Adam Liptak’s article, Locked Away Forever? The Supreme Court Is Considering Whether Life Imprisonment For Teens Offenders Constitutes ‘Cruel and Unusual’ Punishment, asserts that in most cases, “juveniles cross the line, and they have to be treated as adults and punished as adults” (Liptak 14). Age does not determine maturity, nor does it determine responsibility. There is no telling whether someone means it or not when they do something they are not supposed to do. When a child commits murder or rape, people say it is no big deal because they are just kids and were not thinking straight.…

    • 2180 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article, “On Punishment and Teen Killers” written by Jennifer Jenkins which starts off by her discussing the death of her youngest sister, who was pregnant, and her husband in 1990. The offender told his friend about his “thrill kill” and how Jenkin’s sister was begging for her life just before he shot her. He is now serving three life sentences and was sentenced a teen killer as an adult to life, this is known as JLWOP (Juvenile Life Without Parole). Jenkin’s made a point on brain developments when she states, “ If brain development were the reason, then teens would kill at roughly the same rates all over the world.”…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The article On Punishment and Teen Killers by Jennifer Bishop Jenkins speaks about how we here in the United States although we do give teenage murderers very big sentences that make them spend the rest of their life in prison we still respect their human rights. We do not imprison children nor torture and hurt the offenders, we simply are not letting their crimes go in vain. The authors purpose is to let us know that all though many people believe that teenagers who commit crimes should have a smaller sentence because of the way and the time it takes for their minds to develop. In fact she even states the following, "If brain development were the reason, then teens would kill at roughly the same rates all over the world. They do not.…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There have been many opinions on juveniles being convicted as adults on the crimes they have committed. When it comes to some of these harsh crimes, who could not punish the individual to the fullest? It does not matter how old a person is because everyone knows the difference between right and wrong. If someone is raised differently and believes it is okay to murder another human, than they cannot just change their mindset. An individual that makes and adult decision should have the same consequences.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The opposition believes that juveniles should be allowed to be sentenced to mandatory life in prison.the opposition claims that recent brain research made on teen brains has nothing to do with teens committing crime. Author of On Punishment and Teen Killers, Jennifer Jenkins claims that, “ Advocates often repeat, but truly misunderstand brain research on this issue. The actual science does not… in any way negate criminal culpability” (Jenkins). The idea behind this statement is that the recent research on teenage brains is invalid for proving a juvenile less innocent. This idea is highly disagreeable because juveniles are nothing like adults especially in decision making.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Consequences Of Juvenile Crimes

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited

    Today, more youths are involved in gangs, murders, and assaults than history has shown. So, if these children are capable of committing adult crimes, shouldn’t they face adult consequences? It seems that the severity of juvenile crime has risen so much, that it is hard to distinct it from adult crimes. On the other hand, most adult offenders we find today, who commit murder or assault are not first time offenders. The unfortunate thing is that a survey given by the Pretrial Services Resource Center found that an astonishing number of juveniles in adult facilities were charged with nonviolent crimes (ABCNews.com: Juveniles in Adult Jails.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Trying juveniles as adults gives them open opportunity to associate with violent offenders, and the chance to become victimized or assaulted. Consequently, this justifies…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The decision of juveniles being tried as adults in the world of criminal justice has usually been an object of controversy. Some agree that an adolescent who commits a serious crime like murder deserves to be penalized exactly like an adult; while others declare that a minor should not face the same punishment as an adult. However, no matter how severe or appalling a crime may be, juveniles should not be tried as adults; the reason being that everyone should be granted the chance to learn from their mistakes. Juveniles should not be punished as adults, simply because they biologically distinct from adults. Teenagers are the midsection between children and adults.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays