Public Thinking: Smarter Than You Think By Clive Thompson

Improved Essays
Have you ever wondered how technology can help increase the clarity of your writing? In the chapter, Public Thinking in the book Smarter Than You Think by Clive Thompson was published in 2013. Thompson is a well- known Canadian journalist, blogger, and technology writer. Being born 1968, it is ironic how he supports the use of technology rather than trying to convince his audience the downside of it. Through being a journalist, blogger, and technology writer, we can determine that Thompson is promoting the use of technology and how it influences better writing through public thinking. The chapter was intended for youth and young adults, old- fashioned writers, college students, people who are anti-internet, bloggers, writers, and everyone …show more content…
Thompson believes that the use of internet helps improve a writer’s ability to help clarify their thinking process, help clarify the audience’s mind even more, help improve memory of a writer, and help build connections with their audiences. The paper will investigate Thompson’s claims and evidence in order to prove that his argument is unsuccessful by examining his use of the of the following, logos and pathos.

Thompson first states writing helps clarify our thinking. The type of evidence that he uses to support this claim was expert testimony using logos. He quotes from Cecil Day- Lewis from his poetic composition, “If it were clear in my mind, I should have no incentive or need to write about it . . .We do not write in order to be understood; we write in order to understand” (Thomson 51). This evidence that Thompson gave us didn’t function to make his argument stronger, therefore this evidence was unsuccessful. This evidence supports old- fashion handwriting rather than using the internet to publish and help clarify the writer’s ideas. The use of logos wasn’t the problem but he should’ve used different evidence
…show more content…
The argument that was purposed by Clive Thompson was unsuccessful. Thompson claims use of internet would help advance a writer’s ability to clarify their ideas, audience’s understanding, improve the writer’s memory, and help create a better connection with their audience. It is true that technology and the internet would help improve our writing skills but the evidence that he provided for his audience was unconvincing. To support his first claim, Thompson provides an expert testimony using logos. This evidence was not only irrelevant to his claim but it was also unpersuasive toward his audience. This evidence lacked the use of ethos and pathos. Another claim that was made in the text was an audience even clarifies the writer’s mind more than writing does. To support this claim, he provides his audience with an hypothetical evidence using pathos. Thompson relies too much on this theories like the “hand waving” theory but never backs up those theories with any type of reasoning nor analysis about them. This makes the audience question his credibility. For his third claim, he states that writing about things can also help improve an writer’s memory. He then uses another hypothetical evidence using logos. Again, Thompson purposes a theory and gives the audience evidence but he never backs up his claim with reasoning or any type of analysis. Throughout the text, Thompson

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    By expecting the audience to trust him, his lack of ethos in his article leaves doubt in the mind of his reader making them ask “okay, why should we trust you?”. The author also does not use any jargon that is in association with making his point he only uses lower level diction with the exception of one or two…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article, Drucker lacks the necessary information about the effects on the brain that causes these addictions, and he is lacking in that part of the subject. Drucker does not provide any further sources to support his terminology or discoveries. For example, he does not present how the brain plays a role in brain diseases or what causes these reactions. Drucker works with these types of findings and researches on a daily basis, which makes him seem exceptionally credible. Nevertheless, he is aware of these findings and that they may possibly be factual, it would greatly benefit him to provide the reader with cited facts.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He never stated facts from any other source but his own. His essay was mainly very opinionated and he could have made his essay a lot stronger and more persuasive by using sources other than himself, but he didn’t, so Perry also wins on the ethos aspect of the two…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophical questions that are worth asking never will find conclusion. If an answer did result it wasn’t important in the first place. The entire meaning of philosophy is to ask the right questions. That the answers are not as important as finding the union between the universe and the individual. Yet there is a strong contraction that even Russell does not address.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This organizational mistake unfortunately confuses his intended message. Throughout the paper, while seeing notable attempts at providing backing and impressive diction, it is not evident what Zimmerman is trying to claim. It isn’t until the final paragraph that an explicit claim is written. Having to try to discern whether he is pro or anti sex education distracts from his intended message of the paper. Zimmerman didn’t write this essay to conclude the appropriateness of sex education.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, Clifford never used any religious examples with his argument, which maybe if he did, would of helped convince me to be on his side. Also, I think it's a little closed minded to say it is ALWAYS wrong to believe something without sufficient evidence. Furthermore, I appreciated the way James ended his essay. He said to choose what we will and our life is in our own hands. We shouldn't reject or insult other peoples' beliefs just because they are different from ours.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He rarely cites his evidence, and gives the reader a plethora of factual claims that may seem unsupported. The reasons that these two articles take similar approaches do differ, however. Dr. Phil’s reliance on credibility is due to the fact that his article is in a popular source like The Huffington Post. The readers of his article would not expect thorough fact checking or for his work to be cited properly. This may also be due to the fact that he didn’t think it was necessary.…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The six principles of persuasion, according to Robert Cialdini, are authority, likeability, social proof, scarcity, reciprocity, as well as consistency/commitment. The GUESS advertisement does a horrible job at displaying these principles. I do not see the CEOs of GUESS giving me a reason to trust why I should buy their product, therefore displaying no authority. I just see a model that is unknown to me holding the products. Likeability and social proof are not present either because I have no connections and no similarities with the model.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The lack in the quality and quantity of evidence detracts the educated reader from his thesis. Second, the author seemed to be an advocate for the psychanalysis practice. The author strong opinion about the psychoanalysis practice conjure questions about the reliability of the article. Thirdly, the author did not propose a specific solution to the issue of decreased presence in psychoanalysis. If an article addresses an issue it should also propose a specific solution.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is what I shared fresh enough to have an effect is another question that I didn 't think about when composing my essay. Because it is a question that wasn 't considered in the creation of this essay, my text lacks an aspect of scrupulous writing that is necessary in order for it to be a good paper. My essay doesn 't answer this question and, therefore, doesn 't succeed in being a scrupulous piece of work. Additionally, the lack of a call to action in writing ensures the reader has no further engagement with the text after they initially read it. “Capturing Life 's Moments to Last a Lifetime” doesn 't succeed in ensuring that the image has the well thought out and desired effect on the audience.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays